Movement detection thresholds at the human elbow joint.

Publisher Summary This chapter reports experiments that show three things. First, there are systematic changes in movement detection thresholds, observable at the human elbow joint, that cannot be assigned to signals from skin or joint receptors and that must therefore be attributed to muscle spindles in elbow muscles. Second, when only one of the pairs of antagonist muscles generates proprioceptive signals, movement detection thresholds are no higher than when the two antagonists are in a mechanically identical state and both are therefore potentially able to generate signals. Third, significant rises in the movement detection thresholds are observed when they are measured at the active contraction of the elbow muscles. This finding of a rise in the detection threshold during a contraction, compared to that in a passive muscle, is contrary to some earlier observations, and a different result can probably be explained by the way the muscle was conditioned before each test. When considered more broadly, this result is also unexpected. When limbs are moved passively, position sense is poor. In a forearm-matching task, for example, subjects are much more accurate when they place their arms voluntarily than when the passive arm is positioned by the experimenter. Perhaps there is an additional cue, that of gravity, providing positional information.

[1]  M Hulliger,et al.  The effects of fusimotor stimulation during small amplitude stretching on the frequency‐response of the primary ending of the mammalian muscle spindle. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  John C. Rothwell,et al.  Joint afferents subserve human proprioception that is interhemispherically transferred , 1998 .

[3]  J. E. Gregory,et al.  The responses of muscle spindles to small, slow movements in passive muscle and during fusimotor activity , 1999, Brain Research.

[4]  D. McCloskey,et al.  Kinaesthetic signals and muscle contraction , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  F. J. Clark,et al.  Awareness of knee joint angle under static conditions. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Prochazka,et al.  Muscular sense is attenuated when humans move , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  U. Proske,et al.  Thixotropy in skeletal muscle and in muscle spindles: A review , 1993, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  J. E. Gregory,et al.  The effects of muscle conditioning on movement detection thresholds at the human forearm , 1996, Brain Research.

[9]  D. McCloskey,et al.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Human muscle spindle discharge during isometric voluntary contractions. Amplitude relations between spindle frequency and torque. , 1974, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  U. Proske,et al.  Detection of movements of the human forearm during and after co‐contractions of muscles acting at the elbow joint , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  S. Gandevia Kinesthesia : roles for afferent signals and motor commands , 1996 .

[13]  A. Prochazka,et al.  The after‐effects of stretch and fusimotor stimulation on the responses of primary endings of cat muscle spindles. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Mountcastle Vb,et al.  Central nervous mechanisms subserving position sense and kinesthesis. , 1959 .