Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders

The behavioural composition of a group and the dynamics of social interactions can both influence how social animals work collectively. For example, individuals exhibiting certain behavioural tendencies may have a disproportionately large impact on the group, and so are referred to as keystone individuals, while interactions between individuals can facilitate information transmission about resources. Despite the potential impact of both behavioural composition and interactions on collective behaviour, the relationship between consistent behaviours (also known as personalities) and social interactions remains poorly understood. Here, we use stochastic actor-oriented models to uncover the interdependencies between boldness and social interactions in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola. We find that boldness has no effect on the likelihood of forming social interactions, but interactions do affect boldness, and lead to an increase in the boldness of the shyer individual. Furthermore, spiders tend to interact with the same individuals as their neighbours. In general, boldness decreases over time, but once an individual's boldness begins to increase, this increase accelerates, suggesting a positive feedback mechanism. These dynamics of interactions and boldness result in skewed boldness distributions of a few bold individuals and many shy individuals, as observed in nature. This group behavioural composition facilitates efficient collective behaviours, such as rapid collective prey attack. Thus, by examining the relationship between behaviour and interactions, we reveal the mechanisms that underlie the emergence of adaptive group composition and collective behaviour.

[1]  A. Sih,et al.  Behavioral Syndromes: An Integrative Overview , 2004, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[2]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Experimental Evidence that Social Relationships Determine Individual Foraging Behavior , 2015, Current Biology.

[3]  N. Pinter-Wollman,et al.  The primary case is not enough: Variation among individuals, groups and social networks modify bacterial transmission dynamics , 2018, The Journal of animal ecology.

[4]  Richard James,et al.  Animal Social Networks , 2014 .

[5]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Exploring the effects of individual traits and within-colony variation on task differentiation and collective behavior in a desert social spider , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Analyzing social networks , 2013 .

[7]  Jérôme Pansanel,et al.  Understanding Dynamics of Information Transmission in Drosophila melanogaster Using a Statistical Modeling Framework for Longitudinal Network Data (the RSiena Package) , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[8]  James F. A. Traniello,et al.  Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants. , 1999 .

[9]  S. Riechert,et al.  A test for correlations among fitness-linked behavioural traits in the spider Agelenopsis aperta (Araneae, Agelenidae) , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  T. Bilde,et al.  Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Sean F. Hanser,et al.  Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  R. Wollman,et al.  The Effect of Keystone Individuals on Collective Outcomes Can Be Mediated through Interactions or Behavioral Persistence , 2016, American Naturalist.

[13]  J. Pruitt,et al.  RETRACTED: Linking levels of personality: personalities of the ‘average’ and ‘most extreme’ group members predict colony-level personality , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  N. Pinter-Wollman,et al.  Selection for Collective Aggressiveness Favors Social Susceptibility in Social Spiders , 2018, Current Biology.

[15]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  The role of social attraction and its link with boldness in the collective movements of three-spined sticklebacks , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  D. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2010 .

[17]  T. Snijders,et al.  A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution , 2003 .

[18]  D. Wilson,et al.  Video playback demonstrates episodic personality in the gloomy octopus , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Topological effects of network structure on long-term social network dynamics in a wild mammal. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[20]  B. Bateman An integrative overview. , 1976 .

[21]  S. Bengston,et al.  The development of collective personality: the ontogenetic drivers of behavioral variation across groups , 2014, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[22]  Noa Pinter-Wollman,et al.  Persistent variation in spatial behavior affects the structure and function of interaction networks , 2015 .

[23]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Individual and Group Performance Suffers from Social Niche Disruption , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Richard James,et al.  Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  J. Krause,et al.  Personality in the context of social networks , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[27]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[28]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The effect of individual variation on the structure and function of interaction networks in harvester ants , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[29]  T. Snijders,et al.  A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution , 2003 .

[30]  Y. Lubin,et al.  Sexual competition in an inbreeding social spider,Stegodyphus dumicola (Araneae: Eresidae) , 1995, Insectes Sociaux.

[31]  J. Pruitt,et al.  The personality types of key catalytic individuals shape colonies' collective behaviour and success , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  T. Bilde,et al.  Survival benefits select for group living in a social spider despite reproductive costs , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[33]  C. Schradin Intraspecific variation in social organization by genetic variation, developmental plasticity, social flexibility or entirely extrinsic factors , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Andreas P. Modlmeier,et al.  The keystone individual concept: an ecological and evolutionary overview , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  C. Sueur,et al.  Intergroup Variation of Social Relationships in Wild Vervet Monkeys: A Dynamic Network Approach , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[36]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Personality and morphology shape task participation, collective foraging and escape behaviour in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicola , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  N. Royle,et al.  Offspring social network structure predicts fitness in families , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  S. Sosa,et al.  A longitudinal network analysis of social dynamics in rooks corvus frugilegus: repeated group modifications do not affect social network in captive rooks , 2016, Current zoology.

[39]  N. Pinter-Wollman,et al.  Replacing bold individuals has a smaller impact on group performance than replacing shy individuals , 2017 .

[40]  Noa Pinter-Wollman,et al.  The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[42]  Alison M Bell,et al.  An evolutionary ecology of individual differences. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[43]  T. Bilde,et al.  Task specialization in two social spiders, Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Eresidae) and Anelosimus eximius (Theridiidae) , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[44]  A. Harcourt Mutualism between ecologists and ethologists? , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  N. Pinter-Wollman,et al.  Participation in cooperative prey capture and the benefits gained from it are associated with individual personality , 2016, Current zoology.

[46]  Jens Krause,et al.  Network position: a key component in the characterization of social personality types , 2012, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[47]  T. J. Roper,et al.  Group decision-making in animals , 2003, Nature.

[48]  Kate L. Laskowski,et al.  The repeatability of behaviour: a meta-analysis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  T. Groothuis,et al.  Unfolding personalities: the importance of studying ontogeny. , 2011, Developmental psychobiology.

[50]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Evidence of social niche construction: persistent and repeated social interactions generate stronger personalities in a social spider , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  J. Stamps,et al.  Developmental perspectives on personality: implications for ecological and evolutionary studies of individual differences , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Charles J. Goodnight,et al.  Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions , 2014, Nature.

[53]  T. Bilde,et al.  Extreme allomaternal care and unequal task participation by unmated females in a cooperatively breeding spider , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[55]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Analysing animal social network dynamics: the potential of stochastic actor‐oriented models , 2017, The Journal of animal ecology.

[56]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models for Network Dynamics , 2017 .

[57]  D. McDonald,et al.  Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  J. Pruitt,et al.  Persistent social interactions beget more pronounced personalities in a desert-dwelling social spider , 2014, Biology Letters.