Utility-based QoS Brokering in Service Oriented Architectures

Quality of service (QoS) is an important consideration in the dynamic service selection in the context of service oriented architectures. This paper extends previous work on QoS brokering for SOAs by designing, implementing, and experimentally evaluating a service selection QoS broker that maximizes a utility function for service consumers. Utility functions allow stakeholders to ascribe a value to the usefulness of a system as a function of several attributes such as response time, throughput, and availability. This work assumes that consumers of services provide to a QoS broker their utility functions and their cost constraints on the requested services. Service providers register with the broker by providing service demands for each of the resources used by the services provided and cost functions for each of the services. Consumers request services from the QoS broker, which selects a service provider that maximizes the consumer's utility function subject to its cost constraint. The QoS broker uses analytic queuing models to predict the QoS values of the various services that could be selected under varying workload conditions. The broker and services were implemented using a J2EE/Weblogic platform and experiments were conducted to evaluate the broker's efficacy. Results showed that the broker adequately adapts its selection of service providers according to cost constraints.

[1]  Abdelhakim Hafid,et al.  A QoS broker based architecture for efficient Web services selection , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'05).

[2]  Tao Yu,et al.  Service Selection Algorithms for Web Services with End-to-End QoS Constraints , 2004, CEC.

[3]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  Heuristics for QoS-aware Web Service Composition , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06).

[4]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  Achieving Self-Management via Utility Functions , 2007, IEEE Internet Computing.

[5]  Robert D. van der Mei,et al.  Modelling End-to-end Quality-of-Service for Transaction-Based Services in Multi-Domain Environments , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06).

[6]  Daniel A. Menascé,et al.  Two-level iterative queuing modeling of software contention , 2002, Proceedings. 10th IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems.

[7]  Maria Luisa Villani,et al.  An approach for QoS-aware service composition based on genetic algorithms , 2005, GECCO '05.

[8]  Andrea D'Ambrogio,et al.  A Model-driven WSDL Extension for Describing the QoS ofWeb Services , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06).

[9]  Daniel A. Menascé,et al.  QoS management in service-oriented architectures , 2007, Perform. Evaluation.

[10]  Gero Mühl,et al.  QoS-aware composition of Web services: a look at selection algorithms , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'05).

[11]  Anne H. H. Ngu,et al.  QoS-aware middleware for Web services composition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[12]  Daniel A. Menascé,et al.  Resource Allocation for Autonomic Data Centers using Analytic Performance Models , 2005, Second International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC'05).

[13]  Rajarshi Das,et al.  Utility functions in autonomic systems , 2004, International Conference on Autonomic Computing, 2004. Proceedings..

[14]  Daniel A Menascé Scaling the Web Trade-offs in Designing Web Clusters , 2001 .

[15]  Guijun Wang,et al.  A study of service composition with QoS management , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'05).