The faulting mechanism of the San Fernando Earthquake

The large displacement pulse occurring at Pacoima dam approximately 2.5 s after the triggering of the accelerogram is identified as the shear radiation emanating from the point of initial rupture, this interpretation suggesting that the San Fernando, California, earthquake was initiated with massive but localized rupture in the hypocentral region. On the basis of the resulting S-P time at Pacoima dam and teleseismic observations of the reflected phase pP, together with the estimated uncertainties in the local hypocentral determination of Allen et al. (1973), the point of initial rupture is located at 34°27.0′N, 118°24.0′W and h = 13 km. The breakout phases resulting from the rupture of the earth's surface are tentatively identified on the Pacoima dam accelerograms and teleseismic World-Wide Standard Seismograph Network seismograms. For the San Fernando earthquake the breakout phases do not appear to be particularly energetic, but this may only reflect the especially energetic nature of the initial rupture phases. The inferred length of faulting and the estimated origin times of the initial rupture and the breakout phases yield an average rupture velocity, of at least 2.8 km/s. Although they are subject to the uncertainties of the suggested effects of source propagation and of single-station observations, the source parameters of the initial rupture re estimated as follows: source dimension, 6–3 km; stress drop, 350–1400 bars; average slip, 4.6–9.2 m; and seismic moment, 1.7–0.85 × 1026 dynes cm. A 0.8-s time interval after the arrival of S1 contributes 40% of the radiated energy flux at Pacoima dam; the initial rupture event may have generated as much as 80% of the total energy radiated by the San Fernando earthquake. The stress difference accompanying the initial rupture is comparable to an estimate of the north-south compressive stress that is assumed to maintain the continued uplift of the San Gabriel Mountains; the stress drop obtained for the entire faulting process, however, is smaller than either of these by 1–2 orders of magnitude. That the San Fernando earthquake was apparently initiated with massive but localized failure not representative statically or dynamically of the full faulting process most likely reflects a highly nonuniform distribution of strain energy density in the incipient source region. This possibility adds a new dimension to laboratory studies, numerical models, and conventional seismic investigations of the earthquake mechanism.

[1]  M. Toksöz,et al.  Static and dynamic study of earthquake source mechanism: San Fernando Earthquake , 1972 .

[2]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Analysis of the Pacoima dam accelerogram—San Fernando, California, earthquake of 1971 , 1971 .

[3]  Lynn R. Sykes,et al.  Contemporary Compressive Stress and Seismicity in Eastern North America: An Example of Intra-Plate Tectonics , 1973 .

[4]  G. A. Frazier,et al.  Finite element analysis of the residual displacements for an earthquake rupture: Source parameters for the San Fernando earthquake , 1973 .

[5]  M. A. Chinnery The strength of the Earth's crust under horizontal shear stress , 1964 .

[6]  R. Crook,et al.  RELATION OF KNOWN FAULTS TO SURFACE RUPTURES, 1971 SAN FERNANDO EARTHQUAKE, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA , 1972 .

[7]  C H Scholz,et al.  Earthquake prediction: a physical basis. , 1973, Science.

[8]  T. Jordan,et al.  Generalized Inversion of Earthquake Static Displacement Fields , 1973 .

[9]  J. Brune,et al.  Heat Flow, Stress, and Rate of Slip along the San Andreas Fault, , 1969 .

[10]  M. D. Trifunac,et al.  Stress estimates for the San Fernando, California, earthquake of February 9, 1971: Main event and thirteen aftershocks , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  C. M. Duke,et al.  Subsurface site conditions and geology in the San Fernando earthquake area , 1971 .

[12]  T. Hanks,et al.  A graphical representation of seismic source parameters , 1972 .

[13]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Earthquake Prediction: Variation of Seismic Velocities before the San Francisco Earthquake , 1973, Science.

[14]  Amos Nur,et al.  Dilatancy, pore fluids, and premonitory variations of ts/tp travel times , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  T. Hanks The Kuril Trench ‐ Hokkaido Rise System: Large Shallow Earthquakes and Simple Models of Deformation , 1971 .

[16]  A contribution to the determination and interpretation of seismic source parameters , 1972 .

[17]  C. R. Allen,et al.  San Fernando Earthquake series, 1971: Focal mechanisms and tectonics , 1973 .

[18]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Source parameters of southern California earthquakes , 1973 .

[19]  James H. Dieterich,et al.  Time‐dependent friction in rocks , 1972 .

[20]  W. Brace Laboratory studies of stick-slip and their application to earthquakes , 1972 .

[21]  J. Brune Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes , 1970 .

[22]  T. Hanks,et al.  THE SOURCE PARAMETERS OF THE SAN FERNANDO EARTHQUAKE INFERRED FROM TELESEISMIC BODY WAVES , 1972 .

[23]  M. L. Sbar,et al.  Intraplate Earthquakes, Lithospheric Stresses and the Driving Mechanism of Plate Tectonics , 1973, Nature.

[24]  M. Talwani,et al.  Gravity Anomalies Seaward of Deep-Sea Trenches and their Tectonic Implications* , 1974 .

[25]  N. A. Haskell Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults , 1964 .

[26]  J. C. Savage The stopping phase on seismograms , 1965 .

[27]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  A three dimensional dislocation model for the San Fernando, California, earthquake of February 9, 1971 10F, 3T, 42R Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. V64, N1, Feb. 1974, P149–172 , 1974 .