On evolutionary explanations of cognitive biases.

Apparently irrational biases such as overconfidence, optimism, and pessimism are increasingly studied by biologists, psychologists, and neuroscientists. Functional explanations of such phenomena are essential; we argue that recent proposals, focused on benefits from overestimating the probability of success in conflicts or practising self-deception to better deceive others, are still lacking in crucial regards. Attention must be paid to the difference between cognitive and outcome biases; outcome biases are suboptimal, yet cognitive biases can be optimal. However, given that cognitive biases are subjectively experienced by affected individuals, developing theory and collecting evidence on them poses challenges. An evolutionary theory of cognitive bias might require closer integration of function and mechanism, analysing the evolution of constraints imposed by the mechanisms that determine behaviour.

[1]  A. Houston,et al.  Integrating function and mechanism. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  Amots Zehavi,et al.  The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle , 1997 .

[3]  David Wolpert,et al.  Strategic Choice of Preferences: The Persona Model , 2010 .

[4]  A. Houston,et al.  Evolutionarily stable strategies in the repeated hawk–dove game , 1991 .

[5]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Fighting for food: a dynamic version of the Hawk-Dove game , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[6]  R. McKay,et al.  The subtleties of error management , 2010 .

[7]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[8]  T. Sharot.  The optimism bias , 2011, Current Biology.

[9]  J. Monge,et al.  Can subjective resource value affect aggressiveness and contest outcome in parasitoid wasps? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  A. Houston,et al.  Environmental variability can select for optimism or pessimism. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[11]  R. Trivers,et al.  The evolution and psychology of self-deception. , 2011, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[12]  R. Trivers,et al.  Deceit and self-deception : fooling yourself the better to fool others , 2013 .

[13]  O. Leimar,et al.  A TEST OF THE SEQUENTIAL ASSESSMENT GAME: FIGHTING IN THE BOWL AND DOILY SPIDER FRONTINELLA PYRAMITELA , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  D. E. Matthews.  Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[15]  W. Hippel,et al.  Reflections on self-deception , 2011 .

[16]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Is optimism optimal? Functional causes of apparent behavioural biases , 2012, Behavioural Processes.

[17]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  The evolution of overconfidence , 2009, Nature.

[18]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of fighting behaviour: The effect of variation in resource value , 1987 .

[19]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Optimality theory in evolutionary biology , 1990, Nature.

[20]  N. Weinstein.  Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[21]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The evolutionary biology of self-deception, laughter, dreaming and depression: some clues from anosognosia. , 1996, Medical hypotheses.

[22]  A Houston,et al.  The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Petter Johansson,et al.  Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task , 2005, Science.

[24]  R. Trivers.  Deceit and Self-Deception , 2011 .

[25]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[26]  A. Bandura.  Self-deception: A paradox revisited , 2011 .

[27]  A. Houston,et al.  Is it better to give information, receive it, or be ignorant in a two-player game? , 2006 .

[28]  James A. R. Marshall,et al.  Decision-making under uncertainty: biases and Bayesians , 2011, Animal Cognition.