Line Balancing in Parallel M/M/1 Lines and Loss Systems as Cooperative Games

W e consider production and service systems that consist of parallel lines of two types: (i) M/M/1 lines and (ii) lines that have no buffers (loss systems). Each line is assumed to be controlled by a dedicated supervisor. The management measures the effectiveness of the supervisors by the long run expected cost of their line. Unbalanced lines cause congestion and bottlenecks, large variation in output, unnecessary wastes and, ultimately, high operating costs. Thus, the supervisors are expected to join forces and reduce the cost of the whole system by applying line-balancing techniques, possibly combined with either strategic outsourcing or capacity reduction practices. By solving appropriate mathematical programming formulations, the policy that minimizes the long run expected cost of each of the parallel-lines system, is identified. The next question to be asked is how to allocate the new total cost of each system among the lines’ supervisors so that the cooperation’s stability is preserved. For that sake, we associate a cooperative game to each system and we investigate its core. We show that the cooperative games are reducible to market games and therefore they are totally balanced, that is, their core and the core of their subgames are non-empty. For each game a core cost allocation based on competitive equilibrium prices is identified.

[1]  L. Shapley,et al.  ON MARKET GAMES , 1969, Classics in Game Theory.

[2]  B. Peleg,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Cooperative Games , 1983 .

[3]  L. Shapley Cores of convex games , 1971 .

[4]  G. J. A. Stern,et al.  Queueing Systems, Volume 2: Computer Applications , 1976 .

[5]  Yimin Yu,et al.  Capacity Sharing and Cost Allocation among Independent Firms with Congestion , 2015 .

[6]  Marco Slikker,et al.  Spare parts inventory pooling games , 2009 .

[7]  Urtzi Ayesta,et al.  Load balancing in processor sharing systems , 2011, Telecommun. Syst..

[8]  Judith Timmer,et al.  Cost sharing of cooperating queues in a Jackson network , 2011, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[9]  S. Stidham,et al.  Individual versus Social Optimization in the Allocation of Customers to Alternative Servers , 1983 .

[10]  Moshe Haviv,et al.  Subadditive and Homogeneous of Degree One Games Are Totally Balanced , 2014, Oper. Res..

[11]  Marco Slikker,et al.  Analysis of resource pooling games via a new extension of the Erlang loss function , 2011 .

[12]  Srinivas R. Chakravarthy,et al.  Queueing models with optional cooperative services , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  M. Haviv,et al.  To Queue or Not to Queue , 2003 .

[14]  Marco Slikker,et al.  Resource pooling games , 2009 .

[15]  Shoshana Anily,et al.  Full characterization of the nonnegative core of some cooperative games , 2018, Naval Research Logistics (NRL).

[16]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[17]  Moshe Haviv,et al.  Cooperation in Service Systems , 2010, Oper. Res..