Dendritic spine classification based on two-photon microscopic images using sparse representation

Dendritic spines, membranous protrusions of neurons, are one of the few prominent characteristics of neurons. Their shapes change with variations in neuron activity. Spine shape analysis plays a significant role in inferring the inherent relationship between neuron activity and spine morphology variations. First step towards integrating rich shape information is to classify spines into four shape classes reported in literature. This analysis is currently performed manually due to the deficiency of fully automated and reliable tools, which is a time intensive task with subjective results. Availability of automated analysis tools can expedite the analysis process. In this paper, we compare ℓ1-norm-based sparse representation based classification approach to the least squares method, and the ℓ2-norm method for dendritic spine classification as well as to a morphological feature-based approach. On a dataset of 242 automatically segmented stubby and mushroom spines, ℓ1 representation with non-negativity constraint resulted in classification accuracy of 88.02%, which is the highest performance among the techniques considered here.

[1]  Douglas B. Ehlenberger,et al.  Automated Three-Dimensional Detection and Shape Classification of Dendritic Spines from Fluorescence Microscopy Images , 2008, PloS one.

[2]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Sparse Representation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  W. Greenough,et al.  Transient and enduring morphological correlates of synaptic activity and efficacy change in the rat hippocampal slice , 1984, Brain Research.

[4]  A. Dunaevsky,et al.  Dendritic spine morphogenesis and plasticity. , 2005, Journal of neurobiology.

[5]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  R. Yuste,et al.  Morphological changes in dendritic spines associated with long-term synaptic plasticity. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  Scott T. Rickard,et al.  Comparing Measures of Sparsity , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Müjdat Çetin,et al.  Dendritic spine shape classification from two-photon microscopy images , 2015, 2015 23nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU).

[9]  Stphane Mallat,et al.  A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, Third Edition: The Sparse Way , 2008 .

[10]  Allen Y. Yang,et al.  Fast ℓ1-minimization algorithms and an application in robust face recognition: A review , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[11]  Müjdat Çetin,et al.  Disjunctive Normal Shape and Appearance Priors with Applications to Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  An Interior-Point Method for Large-Scale $\ell_1$-Regularized Least Squares , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[13]  Anders P. Eriksson,et al.  Is face recognition really a Compressive Sensing problem? , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[14]  Müjdat Çetin,et al.  Disjunctive normal shape models , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[15]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Discriminative learned dictionaries for local image analysis , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  S. Mallat A wavelet tour of signal processing , 1998 .