What is the best method for child longitudinal plantar arch assessment and when does arch maturation occur?

BACKGROUND The medial longitudinal arch modifies significantly during growth. Nevertheless, authors differ on the age at which the foot acquires the adult-like shape. The best method to assess this arch in children is also controversial. OBJECTIVES Characterize the longitudinal arch of children between 3 and 10 years and compare the applicability of five evaluation methods. METHODS Plantar prints were acquired from 391 healthy preschools children from the University of Sao Paulo, Brazil. We calculated the arch indexes of: Cavanagh and Rodgers, Chipaux-Smirak, Staheli and the Alfa Angle, and compared them with the feet posture assessment. Non-parametric tests were used to compare among methods and ages. Spearman correlation was used to establish relationships among indexes. RESULTS 3 and 4 years old showed a high prevalence of low arches (36-86%). Between 4 and 5 years old, significant difference was observed for all indexes. The indexes presented good correlation among them, although the proportions of the different arch types were different for each age group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The longitudinal arch acquires an adult-like shape progressively, being statistically notorious the moment of medial longitudinal arch's formation between 4 and 5 years old. The Chipaux-Smirak Index is the best index to assess children's feet; it provides a better classification for lower arches and is easily calculated.

[1]  E. Hennig,et al.  The Arch Index: A Measure of Flat or Fat Feet? , 2004, Foot & ankle international.

[2]  J. B. Volpon,et al.  Footprint analysis during the growth period. , 1994, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[3]  M. Nordin,et al.  Basic biomechanics of the skeletal system , 1980 .

[4]  R. Lieber,et al.  Corrective shoes and inserts as treatment for flexible flatfoot in infants and children. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  E. Morag,et al.  The relationship of static foot structure to dynamic foot function. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Robin M. Queen,et al.  Describing the Medial Longitudinal Arch Using Footprint Indices and a Clinical Grading System , 2007, Foot & ankle international.

[7]  P. Dhara,et al.  A comparative study of foot dimension between adult male and female and evaluation of foot hazards due to using of footwear. , 2001, Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science.

[8]  Omer Akcali,et al.  Flexible flatfoot and related factors in primary school children: a report of a screening study , 2006, Rheumatology International.

[9]  L. Staheli,et al.  The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  A H Franco,et al.  Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[11]  T Y Shiang,et al.  Evaluating different footprint parameters as a predictor of arch height. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[12]  M. Doral,et al.  Differences in sole arch indices in various sports , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[13]  K. Boudolos,et al.  A footprint-based approach for the rational classification of foot types in young schoolchildren , 2006 .

[14]  Hylton B Menz,et al.  Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people. , 2005, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[15]  G. Hauser,et al.  Prevalence of Flat Foot in Preschool-Aged Children , 2006, Pediatrics.

[16]  A F Mak,et al.  Change of Foot Size With Weightbearing; A Study of 2829 Children 3 to 18 Years of Age , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  F. Forriol,et al.  Footprint Analysis Between Three and Seventeen Years of Age , 1990, Foot & ankle.

[18]  M. Nyska,et al.  The Medial Longitudinal Arch as a Possible Risk Factor for Ankle Sprains: A Prospective Study in 83 Female Infantry Recruits , 2005, Foot & ankle international.

[19]  T. Kuan,et al.  Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. , 2001 .

[20]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  R. Donatelli The Biomechanics of the Foot and Ankle , 1995 .

[22]  E M Hennig,et al.  Pressure Distribution Patterns under the Feet of Children in Comparison with Adults , 1991, Foot & ankle.

[23]  B. Joseph,et al.  The influence of footwear on the prevalence of flat foot. A survey of 1846 skeletally mature persons. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  Y. Burns,et al.  The Measurement of the Medial Longitudinal Arch in Children , 2001, Foot & ankle international.

[25]  F. Forriol,et al.  The development in footprint morphology in 1851 Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this and wearing shoes , 2003, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[26]  U. Kanatlı,et al.  Footprint and Radiographic Analysis of the Feet , 2001, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[27]  A. García-Rodríguez,et al.  Flexible Flat Feet in Children: A Real Problem? , 1999, Pediatrics.

[28]  C. Tanaka,et al.  Anatomia funcional das cadeias musculares , 1997 .