Relation between Second-look Arthroscopic Findings and Clinical Results after Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

E-mail: bklee@gilhospital.com Purpose: This study examined the relationship between the findings of a second-look arthroscopy and clinical results in double bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendons fixed with a Ligament PlateR. Materials and Methods: Twenty eight cases of a double bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons were retrospectively reviewed. The follow-up period was more than 1 year and all cases were reviewed by second-look arthroscopy. The average follow-up period was 20.6 months (range: 12-34 months). In second-look arthroscopy, the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle of the grafts were evaluated based on the tension, rupture and synovial coverage. Clinical evaluation was assessed using the Lysholm score, international knee documentation committee score, Hop test, Lachman test, pivot shift test, KT-2000 arthrometer and anterior drawer stress radiograph using TelosR in 30 knee flexion. The correlation between the arthroscopic findings of the grafts and the instability tests was evaluated. Results: The AM graft was evaluated as being taut in 89.3% and lax in 10.7%, and the PL graft was assessed as being taut in 71.4% and lax in 28.6% according to the tension. The AM and PL grafts were evaluated as ‘no rupture’ in 78.6% and ‘partial rupture’ in 21.4%. There was no ‘complete rupture’ in any graft. The AM grafts were found to be good in 53.6%, fair in 35.7% and poor in 10.7%; the PL grafts were assessed as good in 50.0%, fair in 28.6% and poor in 21.4% according to the synovial coverage. The AM graft tension showed statistically significant results regarding both the Lachman test (ρ=0.743, p<0.001) and degree of rupture (ρ=0.438, p=0.020). The PL graft tension showed statistically significant results regarding both the pivot shift test (ρ=0.548, p=0.003) and the degree of rupture (ρ=0.663, p<0.001). Conclusion: Double bundle ACL reconstructions using hamstring tendons show good biological and clinical results. The graft tension and the degree of rupture show a statistically significant relationship to the stability of the reconstructed joint. On the other hand, the synovial coverage did not show a significant result.

[1]  Hemanth R. Gadikota,et al.  Comparison of Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions in Restoration of Knee Kinematics and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Forces , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[2]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction flowchart. , 2010, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  F. Giron,et al.  Comparison between Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  K. Fujii,et al.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging measurement of tibiofemoral relation with different knee flexion angles after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[5]  J. Nyland,et al.  Strain pattern comparison of double- and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques with the native anterior cruciate ligament. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  Eiji Kondo,et al.  Second-look arthroscopic evaluations of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: relation with postoperative knee stability. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  H. Moriya,et al.  Correlation between Knee Laxity and Graft Appearance on Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Double-Bundle Hamstring Graft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  The Role of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Anterior Tibial Translation and Internal Rotation , 2007, The American journal of sports medicine.

[9]  Maki Koyanagi,et al.  Arthroscopic evaluation of ACL grafts reconstructed with the anatomical two-bundle technique using hamstring tendon autograft , 2007, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  A. Amis,et al.  Persistence of the Mini Pivot Shift after Anatomically Placed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Anatomic, radiographic, biomechanical, and kinematic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and its two functional bundles. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament double bundle structure: a macroscopic evaluation , 2006, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[13]  J. Dargel,et al.  Morphometric side-to-side differences in human cruciate ligament insertions , 2006, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[14]  H. Yoshikawa,et al.  Graft length changes in the bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between isometric and anatomic femoral tunnel placement. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[15]  Y. Koga,et al.  Contact pressure in anterior cruciate ligament bone tunnels: comparison of endoscopic and two-incision technique. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[16]  N. Nakamura,et al.  Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using two double-looped hamstring tendon grafts via twin femoral and triple tibial tunnels , 2005 .

[17]  Mary T. Gabriel,et al.  Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  J. Ahn,et al.  Second-Look Arthroscopy after ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Patellar Tendon Autografts with Hamstring Tendon Autografts , 2003 .

[19]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of an Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  A. Anderson,et al.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[21]  Markus P. Arnold,et al.  Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: a cadaver study , 2001, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[22]  S. Woo,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human cruciate ligament insertions. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[23]  M. Hull,et al.  Strain inhomogeneity in the anterior cruciate ligament under application of external and muscular loads. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads , 1997, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  T. Muneta,et al.  Intercondylar Notch Width and Its Relation to the Configuration and Cross-Sectional Area of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[26]  Freddie H Fu,et al.  Tibiofemoral joint contact area and pressure after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2009, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[27]  A. A. Amis,et al.  A comparative study of ’isometric’ points for anterior cruciate ligament graft attachment , 2001, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.