The Effects of Speech Production and Speech Comprehension on Simulated Driving Performance

We performed two experiments comparing the effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. In both experiments, participants completed a speech task and a simulated driving task under single- and dual-task conditions, with language materials matched for linguistic complexity. In Experiment 1, concurrent production and comprehension resulted in more variable velocity compared to driving alone. Experiment 2 replicated these effects in a more difficult simulated driving environment, with participants showing larger and more variable headway times when speaking or listening while driving than when just driving. In both experiments, concurrent production yielded better control of lane position relative to single-task performance; concurrent comprehension had little impact on control of lane position. On all other measures, production and comprehension had very similar effects on driving. The results show, in line with previous work, that there are detrimental consequences for driving of concurrent language use. Our findings imply that these detrimental consequences may be roughly the same whether drivers are producing speech or comprehending it.

[1]  D. Mackay The Organization of Perception and Action , 1987 .

[2]  W. Berg,et al.  Effect of the Intensity of Wireless Telephone Conversations on Reaction Time in a Braking Response , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  I. Brown,et al.  Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003 .

[5]  James W Jenness,et al.  Effects of Manual versus Voice-Activated Dialing during Simulated Driving , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Language processing: functional organization and neuroanatomical basis. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[8]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Planning units and syntax in sentence production , 1978, Cognition.

[10]  François Bellavance,et al.  Wireless telephones and the risk of road crashes. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Michael E Rakauskas,et al.  Effects of naturalistic cell phone conversations on driving performance. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[12]  H Alm,et al.  Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones--a simulator study. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  John Vavrik,et al.  Effect of a Concurrent Auditory Task on Visual Search Performance in a Driving-Related Image-Flicker Task , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Myra A. Fernandes,et al.  Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  J. Fodor,et al.  The active use of grammar in speech perception , 1966 .

[16]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[17]  D. E Haigney,et al.  Concurrent mobile (cellular) phone use and driving performance: task demand characteristics and compensatory processes , 2000 .

[18]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Sentence production: from mind to mouth , 1995 .

[19]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Effect of Selected In-Vehicle Route Guidance Systems on Driver Reaction Times , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Independence of Input and Output Phonology in Word Processing and Short-Term Memory , 1999 .

[21]  A J McKnight,et al.  The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving. , 2000 .

[23]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Age and Features of Movement Influence Motor Overflow , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[24]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Detection of extraneous signals during sentence recognition , 1970 .

[26]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  A. Cutler,et al.  Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception , 1992 .

[28]  Anthony Kroch,et al.  The Isolability of Syntactic Processing , 1989 .

[29]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[30]  Jeff K. Caird,et al.  Effects of Passenger and Cellular Phone Conversations on Driver Distraction , 2004 .

[31]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Robert Graham,et al.  Voice dialling can reduce the interference between concurrent tasks of driving and phoning , 2001 .

[34]  John Dunlosky,et al.  What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses , 2005 .

[35]  Yung-Ching Liu,et al.  Effects of Taiwan in-vehicle cellular audio phone system on driving performance , 2003 .

[36]  J M Violanti,et al.  Cellular phones and traffic accidents: an epidemiological approach. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Some neurolinguistic implications of prearticulatory editing in production , 1984, Brain and Language.

[38]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[39]  Håkan Alm,et al.  THE USE OF CAR PHONES AND CHANGES IN DRIVER BEHAVIOUR , 2001 .

[40]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[41]  Donald G. MacKay,et al.  The organization of perception and action. A theory for language and other cognitive skills , 1987, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[42]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[43]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Conversation Disrupts Change Detection in Complex Traffic Scenes , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[44]  Monica M. Glumm,et al.  Cognitive Workload while Driving and Talking on a Cellular Phone or to a Passenger , 2000 .

[45]  E. Zurif,et al.  Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs , 1987, Cognition.

[46]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[47]  J M Violanti,et al.  Cellular phones and fatal traffic collisions. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[48]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  COGNITIVE DEMANDS OF HANDS-FREE-PHONE CONVERSATION WHILE DRIVING , 2002 .

[49]  T. Shallice,et al.  Isolating Cognitive Modules with the Dual-Task Paradigm: Are Speech Perception and Production Separate Processes? , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[50]  H. Benedict,et al.  Early lexical development: comprehension and production , 1979, Journal of Child Language.

[51]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.