Quality in radiotherapy: effective treatment and patient safety.
暂无分享,去创建一个
The purpose of this article is to understand the way in which medical physicists take into account treatment effectiveness and safety when selecting a treatment plan, with respect to the medical prescription and the technical, human and organizational resources available. Data-gathering was based on the allo-confrontation method: 14 medical physicists from five different treatment centers commented on real treatment plans that had been drawn up by their colleagues. Results show that medical physicists have two means at their disposal to control treatment effectiveness and safety: risk avoidance and risk reduction. Risk avoidance is achieved when conceiving the solution. Risk reduction occurs after the design of the plan and consists in accompanying and assisting the radiographers at the work station where the treatment is carried out.
[1] D. Berwick. A User's Manual For The IOM's 'Quality Chasm' Report Patients' experiences should be the fundamental source of the , 2002 .
[2] Adelaide Nascimento. Produire la santé, produire la sécurité : développer une culture collective de sécurité en radiothérapie , 2009 .
[3] P. Carayon,et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.
[4] P. Falzon,et al. Auto- and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.