Mistaking Brazil for a Middle Power

This paper argues that Brazil can only be classified as a middle power by engaging in what Sartori criticized as the process of conceptual stretching. Moreover, it is argued that Brazil neither sees itself as a middle power, nor conducts itself as one despite superficial appearances. After the context is set with a survey of thinking on middle power theory, attention is turned to explaining how Brazil might be mistaken for a middle power before explaining in more detail why the country is not one. Evidence is drawn from Brazil's multilateral engagement in institutions such as the WTO, the inter-American system, the NPT, and the wider context of global development. Ultimately the paper advises policy-makers and academics against using the concept of middle power as a conceptual guide or shortcut to understanding Brazil.

[1]  J. Westhuizen.  Class Compromise as Middle Power Activism?: Comparing Brazil and South Africa , 2013 .

[2]  C. Inoue,et al.  Brazil as ‘Southern donor’: beyond hierarchy and national interests in development cooperation? , 2012 .

[3]  R. Carciofi.  Cooperation for the Provision of Regional Public Goods: The Iirsa Case1 , 2012 .

[4]  Assis Moreira.  China decidirá ajuda de Brics a europeus , 2011 .

[5]  A. Malamud.  A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy , 2011, Latin American Politics and Society.

[6]  Diego Santos Vieira de Jesus.  Building Trust and Flexibility: A Brazilian View of the Fuel Swap with Iran , 2011 .

[7]  Sean W. Burges,et al.  Moving In, Carving out, Proliferating: The many faces of Brazil's Multilateralism Since 1989 , 2011 .

[8]  Sufyan Droubi.  O que está em jogo em Honduras , 2010 .

[9]  C. Patti.  Brazil and the nuclear issues in the years of the Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva government (2003-2010) , 2010 .

[10]  Tullo Vigevani,et al.  Brazilian Foreign Policy in Changing Times: The Quest for Autonomy from Sarney to Lula , 2009 .

[11]  Sean W. Burges.  Brazilian Foreign Policy After the Cold War , 2009 .

[12]  Lael Brainard,et al.  Brazil as an Economic Superpower?: Understanding Brazil's Changing Role in the Global Economy , 2009 .

[13]  Sean W. Burges.  Canada's postcolonial problem: The United States and Canada's international policy review , 2006 .

[14]  A. Hurrell.  Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would‐be great powers? , 2006 .

[15]  M. Hirst,et al.  Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities , 2006 .

[16]  A. Narlikar.  The ministerial process and power dynamics in the World Trade Organization: understanding failure from Seattle to Cancún , 2004 .

[17]  D. Tussie,et al.  The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO , 2004 .

[18]  E. Jordaan.  The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers , 2003 .

[19]  T. Pedersen.  Cooperative hegemony: power, ideas and institutions in regional integration , 2002, Review of International Studies.

[20]  N. Santos,et al.  A identidade internacional do Brasil e a política externa brasileira: passado, presente e futuro , 2002 .

[21]  Monica Herz,et al.  Ecuador Vs. Peru: Peacemaking Amid Rivalry , 2002 .

[22]  J. Ravenhill*.  Cycles of middle power activism: Constraint and choice in Australian and Canadian foreign policies , 1998 .

[23]  V. Reber.  The Chaco War: Bolivia and Paraguay, 1932-1935 , 1997 .

[24]  Alan K. Henrikson.  Middle Powers as Managers: International Mediation within, across, and outside Institutions , 1997 .

[25]  A. Cooper.  Niche Diplomacy: A Conceptual Overview , 1997 .

[26]  Kim Richard Nossal,et al.  Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order , 1993 .

[27]  P. Phillips,et al.  The GATT, Middle Powers and the Uruguay round , 1991 .

[28]  R. Cox.  Middlepowermanship, Japan, and Future World Order , 1989 .

[29]  Stephan Haggard,et al.  Theories of international regimes , 1987, International Organization.

[30]  Carsten Holbraad.  Middle powers in international politics , 1984 .