Length and frequency of intraoperative occlusive events with new torsional phacoemulsification software

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficiency profile of new torsional phacoemulsification software. SETTING: Eye Institute of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Routine cataract surgeries were performed using standard torsional (Ozil) and new torsional (Ozil IP) software. The new software uses occasional pulses of longitudinal energy that are operator specified and system controlled to manage potential occlusion. The new software was compared with the previous standard software, which did not include this option. The video monitor system was recorded in high definition. Measurement of cumulative dissipated energy, balanced salt solution use, and amount of time spent in occlusion were measured in a frame‐by‐frame review of the recorded videos. Data were categorized for analysis by software group and cataract grade (1 to 4). RESULTS: The study comprised 59 eyes that had cataract removal using the new torsional software and 59 eyes using the standard torsional software. Cumulative dissipated energy was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. Balanced salt solution use, time spent in occlusion, and the mean longest continuous occlusion were significantly lower with the new torsional software; these differences were greater as the cataract grade increased. CONCLUSIONS: The new torsional software significantly decreased occlusion time and balanced salt solution use over standard torsional software, particularly with denser cataracts. The net result was a relatively better safety cataract surgery profile. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

[1]  A. Vasavada,et al.  Comparison of torsional and microburst longitudinal phacoemulsification: a prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial. , 2010, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[2]  R. Dimalanta,et al.  Bead‐flow pattern: Quantitation of fluid movement during torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  J. Davison Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 straight and flared 0.9 mm Aspiration Bypass System tips , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  R. Braga‐Mele Thermal effect of microburst and hyperpulse settings during sleeveless bimanual phacoemulsification with advanced power modulations , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  S. Bayraktar,et al.  Comparison of conventional and torsional mode (OZil) phacoemulsification: randomized prospective clinical study , 2009, European journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Davison Cumulative tip travel and implied followability of longitudinal and torsional phacoemulsification , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[7]  X. Liu,et al.  Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[8]  Y. Han,et al.  Heat production: Longitudinal versus torsional phacoemulsification , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  R. Montés-Micó,et al.  Comparison of torsional and longitudinal modes using phacoemulsification parameters , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  Anne-Kathrin Reuschel,et al.  Comparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.