The role of drag in insect hovering

SUMMARY Studies of insect flight have focused on aerodynamic lift, both in quasi-steady and unsteady regimes. This is partly influenced by the choice of hovering motions along a horizontal stroke plane, where aerodynamic drag makes no contribution to the vertical force. In contrast, some of the best hoverers– dragonflies and hoverflies – employ inclined stroke planes, where the drag in the down- and upstrokes does not cancel each other. Here, computation of an idealized dragonfly wing motion shows that a dragonfly uses drag to support about three quarters of its weight. This can explain an anomalous factor of four in previous estimates of dragonfly lift coefficients, where drag was assumed to be small. To investigate force generation and energy cost of hovering flight using different combination of lift and drag, I study a family of wing motion parameterized by the inclined angle of the stroke plane. The lift-to-drag ratio is no longer a measure of efficiency, except in the case of horizontal stroke plane. In addition, because the flow is highly stalled, lift and drag are of comparable magnitude, and the aerodynamic efficiency is roughly the same up to an inclined angle about 60°, which curiously agrees with the angle observed in dragonfly flight. Finally, the lessons from this special family of wing motion suggests a strategy for improving efficiency of normal hovering, and a unifying view of different wing motions employed by insects.

[1]  Z. Jane Wang,et al.  DISSECTING INSECT FLIGHT , 2005 .

[2]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Unsteady forces on an accelerating plate and application to hovering insect flight , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  S. N. Fry,et al.  The Aerodynamics of Free-Flight Maneuvers in Drosophila , 2003, Science.

[5]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  M. Dickinson,et al.  The control of flight force by a flapping wing: lift and drag production. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  Z. J. Wang Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering , 2000 .

[8]  J. Gordon Leishman,et al.  Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics , 2000 .

[9]  Z. J. Wang Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[11]  S. Vogel,et al.  Life in Moving Fluids , 2020 .

[12]  J. Wakeling,et al.  Dragonfly flight. II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[13]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[14]  M. Dickinson UNSTEADY MECHANISMS OF FORCE GENERATION IN AQUATIC AND AERIAL LOCOMOTION , 1996 .

[15]  E Weinan,et al.  Essentially Compact Schemes for Unsteady Viscous Incompressible Flows , 1996 .

[16]  M. Dickinson,et al.  UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODEL WINGS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1993 .

[17]  J. Brackenbury Insects in Flight , 1992 .

[18]  J. Zanker The wing beat of Drosophila Melanogaster. III. Control , 1990 .

[19]  K. Götz,et al.  The Wing Beat of Drosophila Melanogaster. II. Dynamics , 1990 .

[20]  Peter Freymuth,et al.  Thrust generation by an airfoil in hover modes , 1990 .

[21]  E. Purcell Life at Low Reynolds Number , 2008 .

[22]  R. Norberg Hovering Flight of the Dragonfly Aeschna Juncea L., Kinematics and Aerodynamics , 1975 .

[23]  C. Brennen,et al.  Swimming and Flying in Nature , 1975, Springer US.

[24]  T. Weis-Fogh Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals , 1973 .

[25]  G. Horridge The Flight of Very Small Insects , 1956, Nature.

[26]  M. Jensen Biology and physics of locust flight. III. The aerodynamics of locust flight , 1956, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.

[27]  Erich v. Holst,et al.  Biological and Aerodynamical Problems of Animal Flight , 1942, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[28]  F. Hollick The flight of the dipterous fly Muscina stabulans Fallén , 1940, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.