Objective past of a quantum universe: Redundant records of consistent histories

Motivated by the advances of quantum Darwinism and recognizing the role played by redundancy in identifying the small subset of quantum states with resilience characteristic of objective classical reality, we explore the implications of redundant records for consistent histories. The consistent histories formalism is a tool for describing sequences of events taking place in an evolving closed quantum system. A set of histories is consistent when one can reason about them using Boolean logic, i.e., when probabilities of sequences of events that define histories are additive. However, the vast majority of the sets of histories that are merely consistent are flagrantly nonclassical in other respects. This embarras de richesses (known as the set selection problem) suggests that one must go beyond consistency to identify how the classical past arises in our quantum universe. The key intuition we follow is that the records of events that define the familiar objective past are inscribed in many distinct systems, e.g., subsystems of the environment, and are accessible locally in space and time to observers. We identify histories that are not just consistent but redundantly consistent using the partial-trace condition introduced by Finkelstein as a bridge between histories and decoherence. The existence of redundantmore » records is a sufficient condition for redundant consistency. It selects, from the multitude of the alternative sets of consistent histories, a small subset endowed with redundant records characteristic of the objective classical past. Furthermore, the information about an objective history of the past is then simultaneously within reach of many, who can independently reconstruct it and arrive at compatible conclusions in the present.« less

[1]  Charles T. Sebens,et al.  Self-locating Uncertainty and the Origin of Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics , 2014, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[2]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Amplification, Decoherence, and the Acquisition of Information by Spin Environments , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Max Tegmark Consciousness as a state of matter , 2014, 1405.0493.

[4]  P. Horodecki,et al.  Quantum origins of objectivity , 2013, 1312.6588.

[5]  Fernando G S L Brandão,et al.  Generic emergence of classical features in quantum Darwinism , 2013, Nature Communications.

[6]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Quantum Darwinism, classical reality, and the randomness of quantum jumps , 2014, 1412.5206.

[7]  A. Nenashev Quantum probabilities from combination of Zurekʼs envariance and Gleasonʼs theorem , 2014, 1406.0138.

[8]  P. Horodecki,et al.  Objectivity in a noisy photonic environment through quantum state information broadcasting. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[9]  Michael Zwolak,et al.  Amplification, redundancy, and quantum Chernoff information. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[10]  Robert B. Griffiths,et al.  The New Quantum Logic , 2013, 1311.2619.

[11]  A. Kent Solution to the Lorentzian quantum reality problem , 2013, 1311.0249.

[12]  C. J. Riedel Local Records and Global Entanglement: A Unique Multi-Partite Generalization of the Schmidt Decomposition , 2013, 1310.4473.

[13]  Elias Okon,et al.  Measurements according to Consistent Histories , 2013, 1309.0792.

[14]  R. Griffiths Epistemic restrictions in Hilbert space quantum mechanics , 2013, 1308.4176.

[15]  A. Kent Path Integrals and Reality , 2013, 1305.6565.

[16]  Objectivity Through State Broadcasting: The Origins Of Quantum Darwinism , 2013, 1305.3247.

[17]  Michael Zwolak,et al.  Complementarity of quantum discord and classically accessible information , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Wave-packet collapse and the core quantum postulates: Discreteness of quantum jumps from unitarity, repeatability, and actionable information , 2012, 1212.3245.

[19]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Corrigendum: The rise and fall of redundancy in decoherence and quantum Darwinism , 2012, 1205.3197.

[20]  L. Susskind,et al.  Multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics , 2011, 1105.3796.

[21]  A. Kent Real World Interpretations of Quantum Theory , 2007, 0708.3710.

[22]  Wojciech H Zurek Entanglement symmetry, amplitudes, and probabilities: inverting Born's rule. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[23]  Robert B. Griffiths,et al.  A Consistent Quantum Ontology , 2011, 1105.3932.

[24]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Redundant information from thermal illumination: quantum Darwinism in scattered photons , 2011, 1102.3179.

[25]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Redundant imprinting of information in nonideal environments: Objective reality via a noisy channel , 2010 .

[26]  C Jess Riedel,et al.  Quantum Darwinism in an everyday environment: huge redundancy in scattered photons. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[27]  J. Paz,et al.  Redundancy of classical and quantum correlations during decoherence , 2009, 0909.0474.

[28]  J. J. Halliwell,et al.  Partial decoherence of histories and the Diósi test , 2009, Quantum Inf. Process..

[29]  Michael Zwolak,et al.  Quantum darwinism in a mixed environment. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[30]  W. Zurek Quantum Darwinism , 2009, 0903.5082.

[31]  Quantum Darwinism in quantum Brownian motion. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[32]  Thierry Paul,et al.  Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

[33]  W. Zurek Quantum origin of quantum jumps: Breaking of unitary symmetry induced by information transfer in the transition from quantum to classical , 2007, quant-ph/0703160.

[34]  M. Gell-Mann,et al.  Quasiclassical coarse graining and thermodynamic entropy , 2006, quant-ph/0609190.

[35]  W. Zurek,et al.  Quantum Darwinism: Entanglement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information , 2005, quant-ph/0505031.

[36]  W. Zurek,et al.  Predictability sieve, pointer states, and the classicality of quantum trajectories (10 pages) , 2005, quant-ph/0509174.

[37]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Probabilities from entanglement, Born's rule p{sub k}= vertical bar {psi}{sub k} vertical bar{sup 2} from envariance , 2005 .

[38]  Robin Blume-Kohout,et al.  A Simple Example of “Quantum Darwinism”: Redundant Information Storage in Many-Spin Environments , 2004, quant-ph/0408147.

[39]  W. Zurek,et al.  Environment as a Witness: Selective Proliferation of Information and Emergence of Objectivity in a Quantum Universe , 2004, quant-ph/0408125.

[40]  R. Alicki,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 2004 .

[41]  J. Hartle Linear positivity and virtual probability , 2004, quant-ph/0401108.

[42]  Anomalies of weakened decoherence criteria for quantum histories. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[43]  W. Zurek,et al.  Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[44]  P. Dodd,et al.  Decoherence and records for the case of a scattering environment , 2003 .

[45]  T. Brun Probability in decoherent histories , 2003, quant-ph/0302034.

[46]  W. Zurek Environment-assisted invariance, entanglement, and probabilities in quantum physics. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[47]  W. Zurek Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[48]  W. Zurek,et al.  Quantum discord: a measure of the quantumness of correlations. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[49]  R. Griffiths Consistent Quantum Theory , 2001 .

[50]  V. Vedral,et al.  Classical, quantum and total correlations , 2001, quant-ph/0105028.

[51]  W. H. Zurek,et al.  Einselection and decoherence from an information theory perspective , 2000, Annalen der Physik.

[52]  Francesco Petruccione,et al.  Relativistic Quantum Measurement and Decoherence , 2000 .

[53]  J. Halliwell Somewhere in the universe: Where is the information stored when histories decohere? , 1999, quant-ph/9902008.

[54]  J. Paz,et al.  Quantum Limit of Decoherence: Environment Induced Superselection of Energy Eigenstates , 1998, quant-ph/9811026.

[55]  J. Hartle,et al.  Entropy of classical histories. , 1998, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[56]  A. Kent Quantum Histories , 1998, gr-qc/9809026.

[57]  J. Halliwell Decoherent histories and hydrodynamic equations , 1998, quant-ph/9805062.

[58]  J. Hartle,et al.  Comment on "Consistent Sets Yield Contrary Inferences in Quantum Theory" , 1997, gr-qc/9710025.

[59]  R. Griffiths Choice of Consistent Family, and Quantum Incompatibility , 1997, quant-ph/9708028.

[60]  Charis Anastopoulos On the selection of preferred consistent sets , 1997, quant-ph/9709051.

[61]  A. Kent,et al.  Quantum Prediction Algorithms , 1996, gr-qc/9610028.

[62]  A. Kent CONSISTENT SETS YIELD CONTRARY INFERENCES IN QUANTUM THEORY , 1996, gr-qc/9604012.

[63]  Griffiths Consistent histories and quantum reasoning. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[64]  Kent,et al.  Quasiclassical dynamics in a closed quantum system. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[65]  Zurek,et al.  Decoherence of quantum fields: Pointer states and predictability. , 1995, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[66]  McElwaine Approximate and exact consistency of histories. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[67]  A. Kent,et al.  On the consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics , 1994, gr-qc/9412067.

[68]  I. Stamatescu,et al.  BOOK REVIEW: Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 2004 .

[69]  James T. Cushing,et al.  Bohmian mechanics and quantum theory: an appraisal , 1996 .

[70]  C. Isham Quantum logic and decohering histories , 1995, quant-ph/9506028.

[71]  Kent,et al.  Properties of consistent histories. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[72]  Goldstein,et al.  Linearly positive histories: Probabilities for a robust family of sequences of quantum events. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[73]  Daniel M. Greenberger,et al.  Fundamental Problems in Quantum Theory , 1995 .

[74]  W. Ebeling,et al.  Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry , 1995 .

[75]  L. Diósi Critique of weakly decohering and linearly positive histories , 1994, gr-qc/9409017.

[76]  Elby,et al.  Triorthogonal uniqueness theorem and its relevance to the interpretation of quantum mechanics. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[77]  James B. Hartle,et al.  Equivalent sets of histories and multiple quasiclassical domains , 1994 .

[78]  M. Gell-Mann,et al.  Equivalent Sets of Histories and Multiple Quasiclassical Realms , 1994, gr-qc/9404013.

[79]  C. J. Isham,et al.  Quantum logic and the histories approach to quantum theory , 1993 .

[80]  Zurek,et al.  Environment-induced decoherence, classicality, and consistency of quantum histories. , 1993, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[81]  Habib,et al.  Coherent states via decoherence. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[82]  W. Zurek Preferred States, Predictability, Classicality and the Environment-Induced Decoherence , 1993 .

[83]  Finkelstein Definition of decoherence. , 1993, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[84]  M. Gell-Mann,et al.  Classical equations for quantum systems. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[85]  Halliwell,et al.  Quantum mechanics of history: The decoherence functional in quantum mechanics. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[86]  R. Omnes Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics , 1992 .

[87]  Gary J. Nutt,et al.  Open Systems , 2019 .

[88]  W. Zurek The Environment, Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical , 1991 .

[89]  K. Phua,et al.  Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on High Energy Physics. , 1991 .

[90]  R. Omnes Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. IV. Projectors in semiclassical physics , 1989 .

[91]  Halliwell,et al.  Decoherence in quantum cosmology. , 1989, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[92]  R. Omnes Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. III. Classical limit and irreversibility , 1988 .

[93]  Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. II. Interferences and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment , 1988 .

[94]  R. Omnes,et al.  Logical reformulation of quantum mechanics. I. Foundations , 1988 .

[95]  R. Omnes Interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1987 .

[96]  E. Joos,et al.  The emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment , 1985 .

[97]  Robert B. Griffiths,et al.  Consistent histories and the interpretation of quantum mechanics , 1984 .

[98]  W. Zurek Environment-induced superselection rules , 1982 .

[99]  W. Zurek Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? , 1981 .

[100]  H. Zeh,et al.  Dynamics of quantum correlations , 1973 .

[101]  H. Zeh Toward a quantum theory of observation , 1973, quant-ph/0306151.

[102]  James B. Hartle,et al.  Quantum Mechanics of Individual Systems , 1968, 1907.02953.

[103]  H. Everett "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[104]  D. Bohm A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[105]  J. Neumann Mathematische grundlagen der Quantenmechanik , 1935 .