Reefer madness--the federal response to California's medical-marijuana law.

Marijuana is unique among illegal drugs in its political symbolism, its safety, and its wide use. More than 65 million Americans have tried marijuana, the use of which is not associated with increased mortality.1 Since the federal government first tried to tax it out of existence in 1937, at least partly in response to the 1936 film Reefer Madness, marijuana has remained at the center of controversy. Now physicians are becoming more actively involved. Most recently, the federal drug policy against any use of marijuana has been challenged by California's attempt to legalize its use by certain patients on the . . .

[1]  Tim Golden Federal judge supports California doctors on marijuana issue. , 1997, The New York times on the Web.

[2]  G. Friedman,et al.  Marijuana use and mortality. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[3]  J. Kassirer Federal foolishness and marijuana. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Bakalar,et al.  Marihuana: The Forbidden Medicine , 1993 .

[5]  G. Annas Restricting doctor--patient conversations in federally funded clinics. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Kleiman,et al.  Marijuana as antiemetic medicine: a survey of oncologists' experiences and attitudes. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  G. Annas Faith (healing), hope and charity at the FDA: the politics of AIDS drug trials. , 1989, Villanova law review.