The nature of the syllabic neighbourhood effect in French.

We investigated whether and how sublexical units such as phonological syllables mediate access to the lexicon in French visual word recognition. To do so, two lexical decision task (LDT) experiments examined the nature of the syllabic neighbourhood effect. In Experiments 1a and b, the number of higher frequency syllabic neighbours was manipulated while controlling for the first bigram. The results failed to show a pure syllabic neighbourhood effect. In Experiments 2a and b, syllabic neighbourhood and bigram frequency were factorially manipulated. The interaction showed that the syllabic neighbourhood effect was inhibitory when bigram frequency was high, whereas it was facilitatory when bigram frequency was low. Similar patterns of results were found in both the yes/no (Experiments 1a and 2a) and go/no-go LDTs (Experiments 1b and 2b), so varying task requirements of the lexical decision did not influence the effect. These findings are discussed in the context of parallel distributed processing and interactive-activation models, and suggest that orthographic redundancy properties contribute to the influence of phonological syllables.

[1]  Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder,et al.  The syllable's role in speech segmentation , 1981 .

[2]  B L Davis,et al.  Is there a "trochaic bias" in early word learning? Evidence from infant production in English and French. , 1998, Child development.

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[4]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Syllable Frequency and Visual Word Recognition in Spanish , 1993 .

[5]  R. Treiman,et al.  Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words? , 1987 .

[6]  Christophe Pallier,et al.  Attentional Allocation within the Syllabic Structure of Spoken Words , 1993 .

[7]  M. Taft.  The body of the BOSS : subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words , 1992 .

[8]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Models of word recognition , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  R Frost,et al.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  R. Treiman,et al.  How to see a reading unit , 1986 .

[11]  B. Rapp.  The nature of sublexical orthographic organization: The bigram trough hypothesis examined , 1992 .

[12]  Marcus Taft,et al.  The Influence of the Phonological Characteristics of a Language on the Functional Units of Reading: A Study in French , 1995 .

[13]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Syllables and morphemes: contrasting frequency effects in Spanish. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Nadège Doignon,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in French: The nature of sublexical units in visual word recognition , 2005 .

[15]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Orthographic neighbourhood effects in parallel distributed processing models. , 1999 .

[16]  Alain Content,et al.  Sequence detection in pseudowords in French: Where is the syllable effect? , 2001 .

[17]  H. Barber,et al.  Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs , 2004, Neuroreport.

[18]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency , 2004, Brain and Language.

[19]  David C. Plaut,et al.  A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: extension to sequential processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. , 1986 .

[21]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Boris New,et al.  Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[23]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Syllable-frequency effect in visual word recognition:evidence of sequential-type processing , 2000 .

[24]  P. Mousty,et al.  Brulex: une base de donne 'es lexicales informatise 'e pour le franc?ais e 'crit et parle , 1990 .

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[26]  R. Treiman.  The division between onsets and rimes in English syllables , 1986 .

[27]  M. Turvey,et al.  Does visual word identification involve a sub-phonemic level? , 2001, Cognition.

[28]  M. Taft,et al.  The role of syllabic structure in French visual word recognition , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) , 1979 .

[30]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? , 1987 .

[31]  Emmanuel Dupoux.  Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish , 1992 .

[32]  A. Dominguez,et al.  Lexical inhibition from syllabic units in Spanish visual word recognition. , 1997 .

[33]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked Priming of Word and Picture Naming: The Role of Syllabic Units ☆ , 1996 .

[34]  Oswald Ducrot,et al.  Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage , 1972 .

[35]  K. Rayner,et al.  Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements , 2004 .

[36]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  J. Grainger,et al.  Sequential Effects of Phonological Priming in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, Psychological science.

[38]  Bernard Parmegiani,et al.  De natura sonorum , 1975 .

[39]  Athanassios Protopapas,et al.  Attentional Allocation to Syllables in American English , 1996 .

[40]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition , 1998 .

[41]  M. Gernsbacher.  Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[43]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Boundaries versus Onsets in Syllabic Segmentation , 2001 .

[44]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[45]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[46]  Boris New,et al.  Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE , 2001 .

[47]  J. Grainger,et al.  Syllable-sized units in visual word recognition: Evidence from skilled and beginning readers of French , 1999, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[48]  Arnaud Rey,et al.  Where is the syllable priming effect in visual word recognition , 2003 .

[49]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? , 2004 .

[50]  M. Adams.  What good is orthographic redundancy , 1980 .

[51]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The role of syllables in perceptual processing , 1973 .

[53]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[54]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.