Smoothing, enrichment and contact in the element-free Galerkin method

Abstract The element-free Galerkin (EFG) method belongs to the class of mesh-free methods, which are well-suited to problems involving crack propagation due to the absence of any predefined element connectivity. However, the original visibility criterion used to model cracks leads to interior discontinuities in the displacements. Three methods for smoothing meshless approximations near nonconvex boundaries such as cracks are reviewed and compared: (1) the diffraction method, which wraps the nodal domain of influence a short distance around a point of discontinuity, such as a crack tip; (2) the transparency method, which gradually severs the domains of influence near crack tips; and (3) the “see-through” method, or continuous line criterion. Two techniques for enriching the EFG approximations near the tip of a linear elastic crack are also summarized and compared: extrinsic enrichment, in which special functions are added to the trial function; and intrinsic enrichment, in which the EFG basis is expanded by special functions. A contact algorithm based on a penalty method is also introduced for enforcing crack contact in overall compressive fields. Several problems involving arbitrary crack propagation are solved to illustrate the effectiveness of EFG for this class of problems.

[1]  D. Hegen,et al.  An element-free Galerkin method for crack propagation in brittle materials , 1997 .

[2]  I. Babuska,et al.  The partition of unity finite element method: Basic theory and applications , 1996 .

[3]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element-free Galerkin method: Convergence of the continuous and discontinuous shape functions , 1997 .

[4]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments , 1996 .

[5]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A new implementation of the element free Galerkin method , 1994 .

[6]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Contact constraints within coupled thermomechanical analysis—A finite element model , 1994 .

[7]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Element-free Galerkin method for wave propagation and dynamic fracture , 1995 .

[8]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element‐free Galerkin methods , 1994 .

[9]  E. Oñate,et al.  A stabilized finite point method for analysis of fluid mechanics problems , 1996 .

[10]  B. Nayroles,et al.  Generalizing the finite element method: Diffuse approximation and diffuse elements , 1992 .

[11]  Erik Schlangen,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of micromechanisms of fracture of cement-based composites , 1992 .

[12]  Brian Moran,et al.  Treatment of material discontinuity in the Element-Free Galerkin method , 1996 .

[13]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Element-free galerkin methods for static and dynamic fracture , 1995 .

[14]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  ENRICHED ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN METHODS FOR CRACK TIP FIELDS , 1997 .

[15]  D. Sulsky.  Erratum: Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics , 1995 .

[16]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Kernel estimates as a basis for general particle methods in hydrodynamics , 1982 .

[17]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Consistent pseudo-derivatives in meshless methods , 1997 .

[18]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Reproducing kernel particle methods , 1995 .

[19]  Martin W. Heinstein,et al.  Coupling of smooth particle hydrodynamics with the finite element method , 1994 .

[20]  M. Williams,et al.  On the Stress Distribution at the Base of a Stationary Crack , 1956 .

[21]  T. Liszka,et al.  The finite difference method at arbitrary irregular grids and its application in applied mechanics , 1980 .

[22]  Rafael Gallego,et al.  Dynamic Crack Propagation Analysis by Moving Singular Boundary Elements , 1992 .

[23]  S. Attaway,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis , 1995 .

[24]  G. Strang,et al.  An Analysis of the Finite Element Method , 1974 .

[25]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A coupled finite element-element-free Galerkin method , 1995 .

[26]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Fracture and crack growth by element free Galerkin methods , 1994 .

[27]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  Continuous meshless approximations for nonconvex bodies by diffraction and transparency , 1996 .

[28]  L. Lucy.  A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. , 1977 .

[29]  J. Monaghan.  Why Particle Methods Work , 1982 .

[30]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A Petrov-Galerkin Diffuse Element Method (PG DEM) and its comparison to EFG , 1997 .

[31]  P. Lancaster,et al.  Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods , 1981 .

[32]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Enforcement of essential boundary conditions in meshless approximations using finite elements , 1996 .

[33]  Anthony R. Ingraffea,et al.  Modeling mixed-mode dynamic crack propagation nsing finite elements: Theory and applications , 1988 .

[34]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  EFG approximation with discontinuous derivatives , 1998 .

[35]  J. Newman.  An improved method of collocation for the stress analysis of cracked plates with various shaped boundaries , 1971 .

[36]  Mark A Fleming,et al.  Smoothing and accelerated computations in the element free Galerkin method , 1996 .

[37]  Oden,et al.  An h-p adaptive method using clouds , 1996 .

[38]  S. Nemat-Nasser,et al.  Compression‐induced nonplanar crack extension with application to splitting, exfoliation, and rockburst , 1982 .

[39]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Nodal integration of the element-free Galerkin method , 1996 .