Preservice Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Content Knowledge from an Integrated STEM Modelling Activity

Research has shown that preservice elementary teachers are lacking in mathematical content knowledge. However, when activities are properly structured preservice elementary teachers can demonstrate robust content knowledge. This research was undertaken with one class of preservice elementary teachers to demonstrate the conceptual subject matter content knowledge that can be displayed in a well-structured integrated STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics) modelling activity. Integrated STEM education is gaining more attention for its focus on realistic problem solving and quality pedagogy. The integrated STEM modelling activity used in this research was based on five characteristics of effective STEM curricula: (a) realistic contexts, (b) a focus on math and science content, (c) student-centered pedagogies, (d) technology integration, and (e) the use of the engineering design process. The integrated STEM education modelling framework presented here is a useful structure for teaching STEM concepts and giving preservice elementary teachers positive mathematics experiences that may prepare them to better teach math to their future students. In this study the preservice elementary teachers demonstrated developed understanding in symbolic, realistic, language, and concrete representations. However, all groups did not demonstrate understanding of the pictorial representation.

[1]  M. Blanton,et al.  Elementary Grades Students' Capacity for Functional Thinking. , 2004 .

[2]  George E. Glasson,et al.  Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers , 2005 .

[3]  Sean Brophy,et al.  Advancing Engineering Education in P‐12 Classrooms , 2008 .

[4]  Arthur A. Hyde,et al.  Best Practice: New Standards for Teaching and Learning in America's Schools , 1993 .

[5]  Anthony Ralston,et al.  Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics , 1999 .

[6]  Mark N. Hoover,et al.  Principles for Developing Thought-Revealing Activities for Students and Teachers , 2000 .

[7]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Tools, Researchable Issues & Conjectures for Investigating What it Means to Understand Statistics (or Other Topics) Meaningfully , 2010 .

[8]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2006 .

[9]  David D. Kumar,et al.  The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education. , 2007 .

[10]  Helen Meyer,et al.  Mathematics and Science Integration: Models and Characterizations , 2009 .

[11]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Problem Solving, Modeling, and Local Conceptual Development , 2003 .

[12]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education , 2012 .

[13]  Scott P. Lewis,et al.  Preservice Elementary Teachers' Use of Mathematics in a Project‐Based Science Approach , 2002 .

[14]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Impressions of a Middle Grades STEM Integration Program , 2011 .

[15]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The State of Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary and Professional Settings , 2007 .

[16]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Foundations of a Models and Modeling Perspective on Mathematics Teaching, Learning, and Problem Solving , 2003 .

[17]  Michael E. Beeth,et al.  Co-Teaching Science and Mathematics Methods Courses. , 1999 .