'Your Window-on-the-World'

Interactive television (iTV) has enjoyed increasing penetration within the UK's emerging digital television market. As with many new media technologies, its initial marketing positioned iTV as a spectacular new form of television. This has since given way to representations and applications that rely increasingly on a positioning of iTV as `everyday'. Drawing on the work of Tom Gunning, William Boddy and Lyn Spigel, I suggest that the discursive formation of iTV is not simply one of the now familiar stories of a new technology's movement `from the spectacular and astonishing to the convenient and unremarkable' (Gunning, 2004). Rather, this movement is one that is facilitated by the prominence of `window-on-the-world' discourses that not only relate television's digitalization to the initial inception of television into everyday life, but are also illustrative of the particular institutional backdrop of the UK's television landscape and, in turn, suggestive of particular gendered assumptions and positionings.

[1]  Nicholas Negroponte,et al.  Being Digital , 1995 .

[2]  Philip Auslander,et al.  Teleliteracy: Taking Television Seriously, and: Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America , 1994 .

[3]  William Boddy,et al.  New Media and Popular Imagination: Launching Radio, Television, and Digital Media in the United States , 2004 .

[4]  John T. Caldwell,et al.  Televisuality: Style, Crisis, and Authority in American Television , 1995 .

[5]  H. Wheatley.  Re-viewing television history : critical issues in television historiography , 2007 .

[6]  J. Crary,et al.  Suspensions of Perception , 1999 .

[7]  S. Holmes.  (RE)VISITING THE GROVE FAMILY—‘NEIGHBOURS TO THE NATION’ (1954–57) , 2006 .

[8]  L. Manovich,et al.  The language of new media , 2001 .

[9]  Max Dawson,et al.  Little Players, Big Shows , 2007 .

[10]  Jens F. Jensen,et al.  Interactive Television : TV of the Future or the Future of TV? , 1999 .

[11]  J. Bolter,et al.  Remediation: Understanding New Media , 1999 .

[12]  Dylan Tutt.  Mobile Performances of a Teenager: A Study of Situated Mobile Phone Activity in the Living Room , 2005 .

[13]  D. Harvie.  Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity , 1996 .

[14]  D. Morley.  At Home with Television , 2004, Television after TV.

[15]  D. Morley.  Television and gender , 2005 .

[16]  Pyungho Kim,et al.  A machine-like new medium - theoretical examination of interactive TV , 2002 .

[17]  R. Moseley,et al.  Is Archiving a Feminist Issue?: Historical Research and the Past, Present, and Future of Television Studies , 2008 .

[18]  Patrice Flichy,et al.  The Construction of New Digital Media , 1999, New Media Soc..

[19]  Richard H. Rudolph.  When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking about Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. By Carolyn Marvin. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988. ix + 269 pp. $34.50.) , 1989 .

[20]  Jason Jacobs,et al.  The Intimate Screen:Early British Television Drama , 2000 .

[21]  Luisa Doldi,et al.  The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft , 2007 .

[22]  Lisa Parks,et al.  Flexible Microcasting: Gender, Generation, and Television-Internet Convergence , 2004 .

[23]  Charlie Gere,et al.  Digital Culture , 2004 .

[24]  J. Bennett.  THE PUBLIC SERVICE VALUE OF INTERACTIVE TELEVISION , 2006 .

[25]  N. Browne.  The political economy of the television (super) text , 1984 .

[26]  Tom Gunning.  Re-newing old technologies : astonishment, second nature, and the uncanny in technology from the previous turn-of-the-century , 2003 .

[27]  Petros Iosifidis.  Digital Switchover and the Role of the New BBC Services in Digital Television Take-up , 2005 .

[28]  Patricia L. Dooley.  Welcome to the Dreamhouse: Popular Media and Postwar Suburbs , 2002 .