Consistency in physical and on-screen action improves perceptions of telepresence robots

Does augmented movement capability improve people's experiences with telepresent meeting participants? We performed two web-based studies featuring videos of a telepresence robot. In the first study (N=164), participants observed clips of typical conversational gestures performed a) on a stationary screen only, b) with an actuated screen moving in physical space, or c) both on-screen and in-space. In the second study (N=103), participants viewed scenario videos depicting two people interacting with a remote collaborator through a telepresence robot, whose distant actions were a) visible on the screen only, or b) accompanied by local physical motion. These studies suggest that synchronized on-screen and in-space gestures significantly improved viewers' interpretation of the action compared to on-screen or in-space gestures alone, and that in-space gestures positively influenced perceptions of both local and remote participants.

[1]  D. Solomon,et al.  Structuring the concept of relational communication , 1999 .

[2]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Nonverbal leakage in robots: Communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior , 2009, 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  John F. Canny,et al.  Multiview: improving trust in group video conferencing through spatial faithfulness , 2007, CHI.

[4]  Justine Cassell,et al.  BodyChat: autonomous communicative behaviors in avatars , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[5]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  Geminoid: Teleoperated Android of an Existing Person , 2007 .

[6]  Donghui Feng,et al.  Acquiring High Quality Non-Expert Knowledge from On-Demand Workforce , 2009, PWNLP@IJCNLP.

[7]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  MeBot: A robotic platform for socially embodied telepresence , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[8]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk , 2008, CHI.

[9]  John C. Tang,et al.  Embodied social proxy: mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams , 2010, CHI.

[10]  H. Vilhjálmsson Autonomous communicative behaviors in avatars , 1997 .

[11]  P. Shalit The Silent Language , 1964 .

[12]  John Canny,et al.  PRoP : Personal Roving Presence , 2007 .

[13]  Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al.  The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope Vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[14]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Experiments with a robotic computer: Body, affect and cognition interactions , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[15]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[16]  P. Ekman,et al.  Facial action coding system: a technique for the measurement of facial movement , 1978 .

[17]  H. H. Clark Pointing and placing. , 2003 .

[18]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying. , 1978 .

[20]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[21]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[22]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Evaluating the effects of behavioral realism in embodied agents , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Leila Takayama,et al.  "Now, i have a body": uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace , 2011, CHI.

[24]  Cory D. Kidd,et al.  Sociable robots : the role of presence and task in human-robot interaction , 2003 .

[25]  Nigel Simpson,et al.  Porta-person: telepresence for the connected conference room , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  R. W. Root,et al.  Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology , 1990 .

[27]  喜多 壮太郎 Pointing : where language, culture, and cognition meet , 2013 .

[28]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .