Ordinal configural cues combine with metric disparity in depth perception.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] James M. Hillis,et al. Combining Sensory Information: Mandatory Fusion Within, but Not Between, Senses , 2002, Science.
[2] Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al. Object memory effects on figure assignment: conscious object recognition is not necessary or sufficient , 2000, Vision Research.
[3] B. Rogers,et al. The stereoscopic anisotropy: individual differences and underlying mechanisms. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[4] Scott B. Stevenson,et al. Seeing In Depth, Vol. 1: Basic Mechanisms, , 2003 .
[5] F A Wichmann,et al. Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .
[6] Mary A. Peterson,et al. Memory and Learning in Figure-Ground Perception , 2003 .
[7] Stephen Wallace,et al. Figure and Ground , 1982 .
[8] M. Landy,et al. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.
[9] I. Howard,et al. Seeing in depth, Vol. 2: Depth perception. , 2002 .
[10] Michael H. Birnbaum,et al. Scale Convergence as a Principle for the Study of Perception , 1983 .
[11] R. Kimchi,et al. Perceptual organization in vision : behavioral and neural perspectives , 2003 .
[12] David Mumford,et al. Statistics of range images , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).
[13] Felix Wichmann,et al. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[14] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Yacov Hel-Or,et al. A new approach to qualitative stereo , 1994, Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.
[16] G. Woodman,et al. Lower region: a new cue for figure-ground assignment. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[17] Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al. Separating figure from ground with a Boltzmann machine , 1990 .
[18] James M. Hillis,et al. Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. , 2004, Journal of vision.
[19] D. Knill. Ideal observer perturbation analysis reveals human strategies for inferring surface orientation from texture , 1998, Vision Research.
[20] H. Pashler. STEVENS' HANDBOOK OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY , 2002 .
[21] Walter Gerbino,et al. Convexity and Symmetry in Figure-Ground Organization , 1976 .
[22] Mary Henle,et al. Vision and artifact , 1977 .
[23] James A. Crowell,et al. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception , 1999, Vision Research.
[24] B. Gibson,et al. Shape Recognition Inputs To Figure-Ground Organization in Three-Dimensional Displays , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[25] B. Gibson,et al. Object recognition contributions to figure-ground organization: Operations on outlines and subjective contours , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] B. Gibson,et al. Must Figure-Ground Organization Precede Object Recognition? An Assumption in Peril , 1994 .
[27] M. Peterson,et al. Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: which route counts? , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] R. O’Reilly,et al. Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: an interactive account. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.