Review of imaging solutions for integrated quantitative immunohistochemistry in the Pathology daily practice.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays an essential role in Pathology. In order to improve reproducibility and standardization of the results interpretation, IHC quantification methods have been developed. IHC interpretation based in whole slide imaging or virtual microscopy is of special interest. The objective of this work is to review the different computer-based programs for automatic immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) evaluation. Scanning solutions and image analysis software in immunohistochemistry were studied, focusing especially on systems based in virtual slides. Integrated scanning and image analysis systems are available (Bacus TMAScore, Dako ACIS III, Genetix Ariol, Aperio Image Analysis, 3DHistech Mirax HistoQuant, Bioimagene Pathiam). Other image analysis software systems (Definiens TissueMap, SlidePath Tissue Image Analysis) can be applied to several virtual slide formats. Fluorescence is the preferred approach in HistoRx AQUA, since it allows for a better compartmentalization of signals. Multispectral imaging using CRi Nuance allows multiple antibodies immunohistochemistry, and different stain unmixing. Most current popular automated image analysis solutions are aimed to brightfield immunohistochemistry, but fluorescence and FISH solutions may become more important in the near future. Automated quantitative tissue microarrays (TMA) analysis is essential to provide high-throughput analysis. Medical informatics standards in images (DICOM) and workflow (IHE) under development will foster the use of image analysis in Pathology Departments.

[1]  Yukako Yagi.  Critical Comparison of Digital Pathology Systems , 2007 .

[2]  David G. Hicks,et al.  An approach to the validation of novel molecular markers of breast cancer via TMA-based FISH scanning , 2007, Journal of Molecular Histology.

[3]  Robert Pinard,et al.  Development of an Unsupervised Pixel-based Clustering Algorithm for Compartmentalization of Immunohistochemical Expression Using Automated QUantitative Analysis , 2009, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[4]  R M Levenson,et al.  Quantification of immunohistochemistry—issues concerning methods, utility and semiquantitative assessment II , 2006, Histopathology.

[5]  Robert C. Bast,et al.  Translational Crossroads for Biomarkers , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  J. Reis-Filho,et al.  Multiple immunofluorescence labelling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue , 2008, BMC Cell Biology.

[7]  David L Rimm,et al.  Quantitative analysis of breast cancer tissue microarrays shows that both high and normal levels of HER2 expression are associated with poor outcome. , 2003, Cancer research.

[8]  Elaine Kay,et al.  Virtual microscopy as an enabler of automated/quantitative assessment of protein expression in TMAs , 2008, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[9]  Yasodha Natkunam,et al.  TMA-Combiner, a simple software tool to permit analysis of replicate cores on tissue microarrays , 2005, Modern Pathology.

[10]  D. Rimm,et al.  Immunohistochemistry and quantitative analysis of protein expression. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Automated Quantitative Assessment of HER-2/neu Immunohistochemical Expression in Breast Cancer , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Gloria Bueno García,et al.  Critical Comparison of 31 Commercially Available Digital Slide Systems in Pathology , 2006, International journal of surgical pathology.