A numerical study on response modification, overstrength, and displacement amplification factors for steel plate shear wall systems

Design recommendations for steel plate shear wall (SPSW) systems have recently been introduced into seismic provisions for steel buildings. Response modification (R), overstrength (Ωo), and displacement amplification (Cd) factors for SPSW systems presented in design codes were based on professional experience and judgment. A numerical study has been undertaken to evaluate these factors for SPSW systems. Forty-four unstiffened SPSW possessing different geometrical characteristics were designed based on the recommendations given in the AISC Seismic Provisions. Bay width, number of stories, story mass, and steel plate thickness were considered as the prime variables that influence the response. Twenty records were selected to include the variability in ground motion characteristics. In order to provide a detailed analysis of the post-buckling response, three-dimensional finite element analyses were conducted for the 44 structures subjected to the selected suite of earthquake records. For each structure and earthquake record, two analyses were conducted in which the first includes geometrical nonlinearities and the other includes both geometrical and material nonlinearities, resulting in a total of 1760 time history analyses. In this paper, the details of the design and analysis methodology are given. Based on the analysis results, response modification (R), overstrength (Ωo), and displacement amplification (Cd) factors for SPSW systems are evaluated. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Tsutomu Usami,et al.  A TWO-SURFACE MODEL FOR STEELS WITH YIELD PLATEAU , 1992 .

[2]  Chia-Ming Uang,et al.  Establishing R (or Rw) and Cd Factors for Building Seismic Provisions , 1991 .

[3]  Vincent Caccese,et al.  Postbuckling Behavior of Steel-Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Loads , 1993 .

[4]  Mahmoud Rezai,et al.  Seismic behaviour of steel plate shear walls by shake table testing , 1999 .

[5]  Robert G. Driver,et al.  CYCLIC TEST OF FOUR-STORY STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL , 1998 .

[6]  T. M. Roberts Seismic resistance of steel plate shear walls , 1995 .

[7]  J. Berman,et al.  PLASTIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS , 2003 .

[8]  Mohamed Elgaaly,et al.  Thin steel plate shear walls behavior and analysis , 1998 .

[9]  Vincent Caccese,et al.  Experimental Study of Thin Steel‐Plate Shear Walls under Cyclic Load , 1993 .

[10]  In-Rak Choi,et al.  Framed Steel Plate Wall Behavior under Cyclic Lateral Loading , 2007 .

[11]  Carlos E. Ventura,et al.  Unstiffened Steel Plate Shear Wall Performance under Cyclic Loading , 2000 .

[12]  Saeid Sabouri-Ghomi,et al.  Hysteretic characteristics of unstiffened perforated steel plate shear panels , 1992 .

[13]  Saeid Sabouri-Ghomi,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel plate shear walls including shear and bending deformations , 1992 .

[14]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Evaluation of Strength Reduction Factors for Earthquake-Resistant Design , 1994 .

[15]  Helmut Krawinkler,et al.  PROS AND CONS OF A PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1998 .

[16]  T. M. Roberts,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic analysis of thin steel plate shear walls , 1991 .

[17]  Mehdi Hadj Karim Kharrazi,et al.  Rational method for analysis and design of steel plate walls , 2005 .

[18]  Robert G. Driver,et al.  FE AND SIMPLIFIED MODELS OF STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALL , 1998 .

[19]  Carlos E. Ventura,et al.  Shear Analysis and Design of Ductile Steel Plate Walls , 2005 .

[20]  Cem Topkaya,et al.  Natural periods of steel plate shear wall systems , 2009 .