Dosimetric characteristics of dual‐layer multileaf collimation for small‐field and intensity‐modulated radiation therapy applications

The purpose of the present work was to measure the performance characteristics in the penumbra region and on the leaf‐end of an innovative dual‐layer micro multileaf collimator (DmMLC). The DmMLC consists of two orthogonal (upper and lower) layers of leaves; a standard MLC consists of one layer. The DmMLC provides unique performance characteristics in smoothing dose undulation, reducing leaf‐end transmission, and reducing MLC field dependence of the leaf stepping angle. Two standard MLCs (80‐leaf and 120‐leaf versions: Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), a DmMLC (AccuKnife: Initia Medical Technology, Canton, MA), and a Cerrobend (Cerro Metal Products, Bellefonte, PA) block were used in performance studies involving a triangular field, a cross leaf‐end field, and a circular field. Measurements were made with 6‐MV X‐rays and extended dose range film at a depth of 5 cm in Solid Water (Gammex rmi, Middleton, WI) at a source–axis distance of 100 cm. The field penumbra width measured between the 20% and 80% isodose lines through the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, DmMLC, and Cerrobend block were 9.0, 5.0, 3.0, and 2.0 mm respectively. The dose undulation amplitude of the 50% isodose line was measured as 5.5, 2.0, and 0.5 mm for the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, and DmMLC respectively. The planar dose difference between the MLC‐80, MLC‐120, and DmMLC against Cerrobend block was measured as ranging at ±52.5%,±35.0%, and ±20.0% respectively. The leaf‐end transmission was measured at 22.4% in maximum and 15.4% in average when closing a single layer of the DmMLC, and at 2.4% in maximum and 2.1% in average when closing both layers. The MLC dependence of the leaf stepping angle with the DmMLC ranged from 45 degrees to 90 degrees. The standard MLC leaf stepping angle ranged from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. In conclusion, the dose undulation, leaf‐end transmission, and MLC field dependence of the leaf stepping angle with the DmMLC were remarkably reduced as compared with those of the standard MLCs. And as compared with Cerrobend block, the DmMLC provided very comparable performance in field‐edge smoothing and in the shaping of complex fields. PACS numbers: 87.56.Jk, 87.56.Nk, 87.56.Nj, 87.57.Nt

[1]  H. Kubo,et al.  A comparison of arc-based and static mini-multileaf collimator-based radiosurgery treatment plans. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  D. Findley,et al.  Physical characteristics of a miniature multileaf collimator. , 1999, Medical physics.

[3]  A. Shiu,et al.  A pencil-beam photon dose algorithm for stereotactic radiosurgery using a miniature multileaf collimator. , 1998, Medical physics.

[4]  T. Solberg,et al.  Segmental and dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy delivery techniques for micro-multileaf collimator. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  A. Lomax,et al.  A comparison of dose distributions of proton and photon beams in stereotactic conformal radiotherapy of brain lesions. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  M M Urie,et al.  Miniature Multileaf Collimator as an Alternative to Traditional Circular Collimators for Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy , 2002, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[7]  L. Lee,et al.  The roles of multileaf collimators and micro-multileaf collimators in conformal and conventional nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy treatments. , 1999, Medical physics.

[8]  A. Lomax,et al.  Dose conformation of intensity-modulated stereotactic photon beams, proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton beams for intracranial lesions. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  D D Leavitt,et al.  Field edge smoothing for multileaf collimators. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  C. Yu,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of the conformation of the multileaf collimator to irregularly shaped fields. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  J. Forman,et al.  A multirod collimator for neutron therapy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M Saiful Huq,et al.  A dosimetric comparison of various multileaf collimators. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  J. Buatti,et al.  Dosimetric characteristics of a double-focused miniature multileaf collimator. , 1999, Medical physics.

[14]  John A. Antolak,et al.  PTV margin determination in conformal SRT of intracranial lesions , 2002, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  Peter Hoban,et al.  Dosimetric advantage and clinical implication of a micro-multileaf collimator in the treatment of prostate with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2005, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[16]  R. Pötter,et al.  Impact of a micromultileaf collimator on stereotactic radiotherapy of uveal melanoma. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  P. Cadman,et al.  Feasibility of penumbra compensating filters for conformal prostate radiotherapy. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  T. Losasso,et al.  Multileaf collimation versus alloy blocks: analysis of geometric accuracy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Maximilien Vermandel,et al.  Conformal radiotherapy optimization with micromultileaf collimators: comparison with radiosurgery techniques. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  R. Wurm,et al.  Dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy: commissioning and verification of dose distributions. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  L. Souhami,et al.  Killing Two Birds with One Stone: A Dosimetric Study of Dual Target Radiosurgery Using a Single Isocenter , 2006, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[22]  J. Chow,et al.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy with irregular multileaf collimated field: a dosimetric study on the penumbra region with different leaf stepping patterns. , 2006, Medical physics.

[23]  A feasibility study of the Dynamic Phantom scanner for quality assurance of beam profiles at various gantry angles , 2005, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[24]  M K Woo,et al.  Impact of multileaf collimator leaf positioning accuracy on intensity modulation radiation therapy quality assurance ion chamber measurements. , 2005, Medical physics.

[25]  N Reynaert,et al.  Monte Carlo modeling of the ModuLeaf miniature MLC for small field dosimetry and quality assurance of the clinical treatment planning system. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Hui Yan,et al.  A technique of intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) for spinal tumors. , 2002, Medical physics.

[27]  J Wong,et al.  Effects of treatment setup variation on beam's eye view dosimetry for radiation therapy using the multileaf collimator vs. the cerrobend block. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  A R Smith,et al.  Evaluation of multileaf collimator design for a photon beam. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  A L Boyer,et al.  Clinical dosimetry for implementation of a multileaf collimator. , 1992, Medical physics.

[30]  A. Shiu,et al.  An integrated treatment delivery system for CSRS and CSRT and clinical applications , 2003, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[31]  A. Pica,et al.  Indications et résultats du traitement des neurinomes de l'acoustique par radiothérapie stéréotaxique avec LINAC : résultats préliminaires , 2007 .

[32]  Christopher M. Lee,et al.  Dynamic collimator optimization compared with fixed collimator angle in arc-based stereotactic radiotherapy: a dosimetric analysis. , 2005, Neurosurgical focus.

[33]  M Partridge,et al.  A method of improving the spatial resolution of treatments that involve a multileaf collimator. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  A L Boyer,et al.  Geometric analysis of light-field position of a multileaf collimator with curved ends. , 1997, Medical physics.

[35]  C. De Wagter,et al.  The value of the PinPoint ion chamber for characterization of small field segments used in intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  J M Galvin,et al.  A comparison of multileaf-collimator and alloy-block field shaping. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  P. Biggs,et al.  Comparison of the penumbra between focused and nondivergent blocks--implications for multileaf collimators. , 1991, Medical physics.

[38]  S. Jaywant,et al.  Immobilization in stereotactic radiotherapy: the head and neck localizer frame. , 2001, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[39]  James C L Chow,et al.  Dosimetric effect of collimating jaws for small multileaf collimated fields. , 2005, Medical physics.

[40]  Matchline dosimetry in step and shoot IMRT fields: a film study. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.