A model conditional processor to assess predictive uncertainty in flood forecasting

Abstract This paper briefly discusses the nature, the causes and the role of predictive uncertainty in flood forecasting and proposes a novel approach to its estimation. Following the definition of predictive uncertainty, its importance in the decision process is highlighted in relation to the different sources of errors (model, parameter, observations, boundary conditions) that affect flood forecasting. Moreover, the paper briefly analyses the importance of using a full predictive uncertainty, obtained by marginalising the parameter uncertainty, instead of the predictive uncertainty conditional to a single parameter set. Finally, a new Model Conditional Processor (MCP) for the assessment of predictive uncertainty is then proposed as an alternative to the Hydrologic Uncertainty Processor (HUP) introduced by Krzysztofowicz as well as to the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) approach due to Raftery et al. The new MCP approach, which aims at assessing, and possibly reducing, predictive uncertainty, allows combination of the observations with one or several models’ forecasts in a multi‐Normal space, by transforming observations and model forecasts in a multivariate Normal space by means of the Normal Quantile Transform. The results of the new approach are shown for the case of the River Po in Italy, and compared with the results obtainable both with the HUP and the BMA.

[1]  Martin Casdagli,et al.  Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series , 1989 .

[2]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection in Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[3]  S. Yakowitz,et al.  Nearest Neighbor Methods for Time Series, with Application to Rainfall/Runoff Prediction , 1987 .

[4]  M. Trosset,et al.  Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models , 2001 .

[5]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[6]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[7]  K. Beven On undermining the science? , 2006 .

[8]  Peter Young,et al.  Data-based Mechanistic Modelling and Validation of Rainfall-flow Processes , 2001 .

[9]  Ezio Todini,et al.  PAB (Parabolic and Backwater) an unconditionally stable flood routing scheme particularly suited for real time forecasting and control , 1986 .

[10]  Mario L. V. Martina,et al.  Reply to comment by Keith Beven, Paul Smith and Jim Freer on “Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology” , 2007 .

[11]  Peter C Young,et al.  Advances in real–time flood forecasting , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  E. Todini Hydrological catchment modelling: past, present and future , 2007 .

[13]  Nitis Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Correlation Coefficient , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[14]  David Draper,et al.  Assessment and Propagation of Model Uncertainty , 2011 .

[15]  D. Broomhead,et al.  Radial Basis Functions, Multi-Variable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks , 1988 .

[16]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: The question of parameter observability and uniqueness , 1983 .

[18]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[19]  Bruce A. Robinson,et al.  Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: Comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[20]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[21]  P. W. Strike,et al.  Forecasting and control , 1991 .

[22]  Sze Huey Tan,et al.  The Correlation Coefficient , 2009 .

[23]  P. Mantovan,et al.  Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology , 2006 .

[24]  S. Yakowitz NEAREST‐NEIGHBOUR METHODS FOR TIME SERIES ANALYSIS , 1987 .

[25]  M. G. Anderson,et al.  DATA-BASED MECHANISTIC MODELLING AND VALIDATION OF RAINFALL-FLOW PROCESSES , 2001 .

[26]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Bayesian theory of probabilistic forecasting via deterministic hydrologic model , 1999 .

[27]  M. Degroot Optimal Statistical Decisions , 1970 .

[28]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters , 2002 .

[29]  V. Klemeš Conceptualization and scale in hydrology , 1983 .

[30]  Howard Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[31]  E. Lehmann,et al.  Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks , 1976 .

[32]  A. Shamseldin Application of a neural network technique to rainfall-runoff modelling , 1997 .

[33]  David S. Broomhead,et al.  Multivariable Functional Interpolation and Adaptive Networks , 1988, Complex Syst..

[34]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Hydrologic uncertainty processor for probabilistic river stage forecasting , 2000 .

[35]  D. Lindley The Choice of Variables in Multiple Regression , 1968 .

[36]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Theory of Probability , 1990 .

[37]  Mario L. V. Martina,et al.  Flood forecasting using a fully distributed model: application of the TOPKAPI model to the Upper Xixian Catchment , 2005 .

[38]  Ezio Todini,et al.  Comment on: ‘On undermining the science?’ by Keith Beven , 2007 .

[39]  A. Raftery,et al.  Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles , 2005 .

[40]  David Lindley,et al.  Optimal Statistical Decisions , 1971 .

[41]  A. L. Edwards,et al.  An introduction to linear regression and correlation. , 1985 .

[42]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Geometry from a Time Series , 1980 .

[43]  Ezio Todini Using phase-state modelling for inferring forecasting uncertainty in nonlinear stochastic decision schemes , 1999 .