The particle dry deposition component of total deposition from air quality models: right, wrong or uncertain?

Abstract Dry deposition is an important loss process for atmospheric particles and can be a significant part of total deposition estimates calculated for critical loads analyses. However, algorithms used in large-scale air quality and atmospheric chemistry models to predict particle deposition velocity as a function of particle size are highly uncertain. Many of these algorithms, although derived from a common heritage, predict vastly different particle deposition velocities for a given particle diameter even under identical environmental conditions for major land use classes. Even more problematic, for vegetated landscapes (forests, in particular) the algorithms do not agree very well with available measurements. In this work, we perform a sensitivity study to estimate how significant the uncertainties in particle deposition algorithms may be in an air quality model’s predictions of ground-level fine particle concentrations, particle deposition and overall total deposition of nitrogen and sulfur. Our results suggest that fine particle concentration predictions at the surface may vary by 5–15% depending on the choice of particle deposition velocity algorithm, while particle dry deposition is affected to a much greater extent with differences among algorithms >200%. Moreover, if accumulation mode particle dry deposition measurements over forests are correct, then dry particle deposition and total elemental deposition to these landscapes may be much larger than is typically simulated by current air quality and atmospheric chemistry models, calling into question commonly available estimates of total deposition and their use in critical loads analyses. Since accurate predictions of atmospheric particle concentrations and deposition are critically important for future air quality, weather and climate models and management of pollutant deposition to sensitive ecosystems, an investment in new dry deposition measurements in conjunction with integrated modelling efforts seems not only justified but vitally necessary to advance and improve the treatment of particle dry deposition processes in atmospheric models.

[1]  M. Tjernström,et al.  Near-surface profiles of aerosol number concentration and temperature over the Arctic Ocean , 2011 .

[2]  T. Lavery,et al.  Estimates of the atmospheric deposition of sulfur and nitrogen species: Clean Air Status and Trends Network 1990-2000. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Measurements of aerosol particle dry deposition velocity using the relaxed eddy accumulation technique , 2007 .

[4]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Long-term aerosol particle flux observations. Part II: Particle size statistics and deposition velocities , 2011 .

[5]  J. Pleim,et al.  Surface Flux Modeling for Air Quality Applications , 2011 .

[6]  M. Gallagher,et al.  Measurements of aerosol fluxes to Speulder forest using a micrometeorological technique , 1997 .

[7]  Greg Yarwood,et al.  Impact of an Updated Carbon Bond Mechanism on Predictions from the CMAQ Modeling System: Preliminary Assessment , 2008 .

[8]  W. Slinn,et al.  Predictions for particle deposition on natural waters , 1980 .

[9]  J. Deardorff.  Convective Velocity and Temperature Scales for the Unstable Planetary Boundary Layer and for Rayleigh Convection , 1970 .

[10]  Shao-Meng Li,et al.  Aerosol flux measurements above a mixed forest at Borden, Ontario , 2010 .

[11]  S. Larsen,et al.  Size‐resolved fluxes of sub‐100‐nm particles over forests , 2009 .

[12]  B. Hicks,et al.  Dry deposition of particles to canopies—A look back and the road forward , 2016 .

[13]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Assessment of biomass burning smoke influence on environmental conditions for multiyear tornado outbreaks by combining aerosol‐aware microphysics and fire emission constraints , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[14]  Andrew P. Morse,et al.  Measurements of the Size Dependence of Cloud Droplet Deposition at a Hill Site , 1988 .

[15]  B. Hicks.  On the determination of total deposition to remote areas , 1995 .

[16]  A. Nenes,et al.  Continued development and testing of a new thermodynamic aerosol module for urban and regional air quality models , 1999 .

[17]  B. Hicks,et al.  A field investigation of sulfate fluxes to a deciduous forest , 1989 .

[18]  R. Draxler,et al.  Regional real-time smoke prediction systems , 2009 .

[19]  Fabien Anselmet,et al.  Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part II: A new modelling approach and applications , 2008 .

[20]  T. Vesala,et al.  The effects of the canopy medium on dry deposition velocities of aerosol particles in the canopy sub-layer above forested ecosystems , 2011 .

[21]  G. Schmitt,et al.  Experimental Investigations on the Deposition of Trace Elements in Forest Areas , 1988 .

[22]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  A review of current knowledge concerning size-dependent aerosol removal , 2006 .

[23]  J. Pleim.  A Combined Local and Nonlocal Closure Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer. Part I: Model Description and Testing , 2007 .

[24]  G. Lear,et al.  A novel hybrid approach for estimating total deposition in the United States , 2014 .

[25]  R. Harrison,et al.  Dry deposition of fine aerosol to a short grass surface , 1991 .

[26]  Dry deposition of particles to a pine plantation , 1989 .

[27]  M. Gallagher,et al.  Size‐resolved measurements of cloud droplet deposition velocity to a forest canopy using an eddy correlation technique , 1991 .

[28]  W. S. Clough.  The deposition of particles on moss and grass surfaces , 1975 .

[29]  G. P. Wyers,et al.  Micrometeorological measurement of the dry deposition flux of sulphate and nitrate aerosols to coniferous forest , 1997 .

[30]  Xinxiao Yu,et al.  Deposition Velocity of PM2.5 in the Winter and Spring above Deciduous and Coniferous Forests in Beijing, China , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  H. Neumann,et al.  Eddy correlation measurements of atmospheric fluxes of ozone, sulphur, and particulates during the Champaign Intercomparison Study , 1985 .

[32]  Jean-Paul Hettelingh,et al.  The use of critical loads in emission reduction agreements in Europe , 1995 .

[33]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Central American biomass burning smoke can increase tornado severity in the U.S. , 2015 .

[34]  C. Fairall,et al.  Eddy Correlation Measurements of the Dry Deposition of Particles in Wintertime , 1988 .

[35]  G. Gravenhorst,et al.  Dry Deposition of Atmoshperic Particles to an Old Spruce Stand , 1989 .

[36]  H. Sievering.  Profile measurements of particle dry deposition velocity at an air-land interface , 1982 .

[37]  Rudolf B. Husar,et al.  An eddy-correlation measurement of particulate deposition from the atmosphere☆ , 1977 .

[38]  B. Hicks.  Measuring dry deposition: A re-assessment of the state of the art , 1986 .

[39]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Relaxed Eddy Accumulation System for Size-Resolved Aerosol Particle Flux Measurements , 2004 .

[40]  Aerosol particle dry deposition to canopy and forest floor measured by two‐layer eddy covariance system , 2009 .

[41]  R. Barthelmie,et al.  A review of measurement and modelling results of particle atmosphere–surface exchange , 2008 .

[42]  D. Sullivan,et al.  The BlueSky smoke modeling framework , 2008 .

[43]  Jeffrey M. Vukovich,et al.  Updates to the Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions ( SMOKE ) Modeling System and Integration with Models-3 , 1999 .

[44]  S. Larsen,et al.  Particle fluxes over forests: Analyses of flux methods and functional dependencies , 2007 .

[45]  Zitouni Ould-Dada,et al.  Dry deposition profile of small particles within a model spruce canopy. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[46]  C. Davidson,et al.  Airborne Concentrations and Dry Deposition Fluxes of Particulate Species to Surrogate Surfaces Deployed in Southern Lake Michigan , 1998 .

[47]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  A size-segregated particle dry deposition scheme for an atmospheric aerosol module , 2001 .

[48]  H. W. Georgii,et al.  Mechanisms and Effects of Pollutant-Transfer into Forests , 1989, Springer Netherlands.

[49]  L. Barrie,et al.  An experimental and theoretical investigation of the dry deposition of particles to snow, pine trees and artificial collectors , 1983 .

[50]  A. Nenes,et al.  ISORROPIA: A New Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model for Multiphase Multicomponent Inorganic Aerosols , 1998 .

[51]  J. Lynch,et al.  Present and future nitrogen deposition to national parks in the United States: critical load exceedances , 2013 .

[52]  M. Tjernström,et al.  On the potential contribution of open lead particle emissions to the central Arctic aerosol concentration , 2010 .

[53]  E. Cowling,et al.  The Nitrogen Cascade , 2003 .

[54]  Micrometeorological measurements of particle deposition velocities to moorland vegetation , 2002 .

[55]  Quality Assurance Decisions with Air Models: A Case Study of Imputation of Missing Input Data Using EPA’s Multi-layer Model , 2011 .

[56]  D. Covert,et al.  Size-dependent aerosol deposition velocities during BEARPEX'07 , 2010 .

[57]  J. F. Clarke,et al.  A multilayer model for inferring dry deposition using standard meteorological measurements , 1998 .

[58]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  Development and validation of a size-resolved particle dry deposition scheme for application in aerosol transport models , 2010 .

[59]  E. Mårtensson,et al.  Emission and dry deposition of accumulation mode particles in the Amazon Basin , 2010 .

[60]  Jean-Pascal van Ypersele de Strihou.  Climate Change 2014 - Synthesis Report , 2015 .

[61]  W. Slinn,et al.  Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative canopies , 1982 .

[62]  A. Nenes,et al.  MADM-A New Multicomponent Aerosol Dynamics Model , 2000 .

[63]  F. Belosi,et al.  Deposition velocity of ultrafine particles measured with the Eddy‐Correlation Method over the Nansen Ice Sheet (Antarctica) , 2010 .

[64]  R. Draxler,et al.  RECENT CHANGES TO THE HAZARD MAPPING SYSTEM , 2006 .

[65]  A. C. Chamberlain,et al.  Transport of Lycopodium spores and other small particles to rough surfaces , 1967, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[66]  Li Jia,et al.  Evaluating parameterizations of aerodynamic resistance to heat transfer using field measurements , 2007 .

[67]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Turbulent aerosol fluxes over the Arctic Ocean: 1. Dry deposition over sea and pack ice , 2001 .

[68]  Michael D. Moran,et al.  Operational model evaluation for particulate matter in Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII , 2012 .

[69]  D. Covert,et al.  Eddy correlation measurements of aerosol deposition to grass , 2004 .

[70]  B. Hicks,et al.  New directions: Time for a new approach to modeling surface-atmosphere exchanges in air quality models? , 2016 .

[71]  U. Möller,et al.  Mechanisms of transport from the atmosphere to the Earth's surface , 1970 .

[72]  Y. Rudich,et al.  Fluxes of Fine Particles Over a Semi-Arid Pine Forest: Possible Effects of a Complex Terrain , 2013 .

[73]  Georg A. Grell,et al.  Integrated modeling for forecasting weather and air quality: A call for fully coupled approaches , 2011 .

[74]  R. Draxler,et al.  Chapter 22 Regional Real-Time Smoke Prediction Systems , 2008 .

[75]  T. Chai,et al.  Assessment of NOx and O3 forecasting performances in the U.S. National Air Quality Forecasting Capability before and after the 2012 major emissions updates , 2014 .

[76]  Gabriele Curci,et al.  Evaluation of operational on-line-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part I: Ozone , 2015 .

[77]  F. Anselmet,et al.  Aerosol dry deposition on vegetative canopies. Part I: Review of present knowledge , 2008 .

[78]  P. Makar,et al.  Modelling aerosol–cloud–meteorology interaction: A case study with a fully coupled air quality model (GEM-MACH) , 2015 .

[79]  W. Slinn.  Some approximations for the wet and dry removal of particles and gases from the atmosphere , 1977 .

[80]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Measurements of dust deposition velocity in a wind-tunnel experiment , 2014 .

[81]  S. Larsen,et al.  Upward fluxes of particles over forests: when, where, why? , 2008 .

[82]  G. Gravenhorst,et al.  Deposition of Atmospheric Aerosol Particles to Beech- and Spruce Forest , 1982 .

[83]  T. Chai,et al.  Long-term NOx trends over large cities in the United States during the great recession: Comparison of satellite retrievals, ground observations, and emission inventories , 2015 .

[84]  Gabriele Curci,et al.  Evaluation of operational online-coupled regional air quality models over Europe and North America in the context of AQMEII phase 2. Part II: Particulate matter , 2015 .

[85]  Ü. Rannik,et al.  Vertical aerosol fluxes measured by the eddy covariance method and deposition of nucleation mode particles above a Scots pine forest in southern Finland , 2000 .

[86]  Bonyoung Koo,et al.  Integrated approaches to modeling the organic and inorganic atmospheric aerosol components , 2003 .

[87]  C. Davidson,et al.  Determination of size-dependent dry particle deposition velocities with multiple intrinsic elemental tracers , 1998 .

[88]  B. Hicks.  On Estimating Dry Deposition Rates in Complex Terrain , 2008 .

[89]  Sara C. Pryor,et al.  An extended dry deposition model for aerosols onto broadleaf canopies , 2009 .

[90]  Mark Ruminski,et al.  NAQFC Developmental Forecast Guidance for Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) , 2017 .

[91]  Experimental Investigations , 1955 .

[92]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Integrated Modeling , 2011, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management.

[93]  S. F. Wu,et al.  Effect of changes in climate and emissions on future sulfate‐nitrate‐ammonium aerosol levels in the United States , 2009 .

[94]  D. Byun,et al.  Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System , 2006 .

[95]  B. Hicks,et al.  Some direct measurements of atmospheric sulfur fluxes over a pine plantation , 1982 .

[96]  Dry deposition of PM2.5 sulfate above a hilly forest using relaxed eddy accumulation , 2015 .

[97]  Kentaro Hayashi,et al.  Deposition velocity of PM2.5 sulfate in the summer above a deciduous forest in central Japan , 2010 .

[98]  S. Pryor.  Size-resolved particle deposition velocities of sub-100 nm diameter particles over a forest , 2006 .

[99]  H. Sievering.  Profile measurements of particle mass transfer at the air-water interface , 1981 .

[100]  T. Meyers,et al.  Estimation of dry deposition velocity using inferential models and site-specific meteorology: Uncertainty due to siting of meteorological towers , 1997 .

[101]  M. Wesely,et al.  Measurements and parameterization of particulate sulfur dry deposition over grass , 1985 .

[102]  Greg Yarwood,et al.  Evaluation of Multisectional and Two-Section Particulate Matter Photochemical Grid Models in the Western United States , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[103]  J. Lynch,et al.  Effects of nitrogen deposition and empirical nitrogen critical loads for ecoregions of the United States , 2011 .