Noncollaborative Resource Management for Wireless Multimedia Applications Using Mechanism Design

We propose to add a new dimension to existing wireless multimedia communications systems by enabling competing stations to proactively engage in the resource management game by adapting their cross-layer transmission strategies. For this, we model wireless stations (WSTAs) as rational and selfish players competing for available wireless resources in a dynamic game. We focus on polling-based wireless LAN (WLAN) networks, where developing an efficient solution for managing the available transmission opportunities is of paramount importance. The resource allocation game is coordinated by a network moderator, which deploys a novel resource management based on the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism to determine a) the amount of time to be allocated to the various users and b) the transmission cost associated to the allocated resources. The transmission cost is referred to in the VCG mechanism as "transfer" and depends not on the used resources, but rather on the inconvenience (in terms of utility impact) that it causes to other WSTAs. The transfer is introduced in order to discourage WSTAs from lying about their resource requirements. Importantly, this proposed dynamic resource management approach for wireless multimedia applications changes the passive way stations are currently adapting their cross-layer strategies by enabling them to selfishly influence the wireless systems dynamics by proactively adapting their packet scheduling strategies, error protection strategies, etc. Hence, each wireless station can play the resource management game by adapting its multimedia transmission strategy depending on the experienced channel conditions, derived video quality, attitude towards risk, willingness to pay for resources and available information about the wireless network. Our simulations show that using the VCG mechanism the WSTAs do not have any incentives to lie about their resource requirements as otherwise they will be severely penalized by a high transfer. We also show that deploying advanced cross-layer strategies for playing the resource management game significantly benefit the WSTAs' received video quality. The willingness-to-pay for resources is introduced to provide WSTAs a tool to gather additional resources whenever they need to transmit an important (part of a) video sequence by agreeing to pay for resources an increased cost. A novel risk-aware scheduling scheme is also proposed that provides WSTAs the ability to dynamically avoid network congestion and hence, reduce their incurred transfer

[1]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Charging and rate control for elastic traffic , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[2]  David C. Parkes Classic Mechanism Design , .

[3]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Multicast and unicast real-time video streaming over wireless LANs , 2002, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[4]  Andrew T. Campbell,et al.  Pricing, provisioning and peering: dynamic markets for differentiated Internet services and implications for network interconnections , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Dilip Krishnaswamy,et al.  Scalable Adaptive Wireless Networks for Multimedia in the Proactive Enterprise , 2004 .

[6]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Performance Analysis of Video Transmission Over IEEE 802.11a/e WLANs , 2007, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[7]  R. W. Lucky,et al.  Tragedy of the commons [Reflections] , 2006 .

[8]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Cross-layer design of ad hoc networks for real-time video streaming , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[9]  Abhay Parekh,et al.  A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks: the single-node case , 1993, TNET.

[10]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[11]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[12]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Cross-layer resource allocation for delay constrained wireless video transmission , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[13]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  Distributed fair scheduling in a wireless LAN , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[14]  R.A. Berry,et al.  Cross-layer wireless resource allocation , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[15]  Leonardo Badia,et al.  Demand and pricing effects on the radio resource allocation of multimedia communication systems , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[16]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Optimized scalable video streaming over IEEE 802.11 a/e HCCA wireless networks under delay constraints , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[17]  M. van der Schaar,et al.  Cross-layer wireless multimedia transmission: challenges, principles, and new paradigms , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[18]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Pricing in computer networks: motivation, formulation, and example , 1993, TNET.

[19]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[20]  Abhay Parekh,et al.  A generalized processor sharing approach to flow control in integrated services networks-the single node case , 1992, [Proceedings] IEEE INFOCOM '92: The Conference on Computer Communications.

[21]  Simin Nadjm-Tehrani,et al.  Time-aware utility-based resource allocation in wireless networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[22]  B. Hajek,et al.  Strategic Buyers in a Sum Bid Game for Flat Networks , 2004 .

[23]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Cross-Layer Packetization and Retransmission Strategies for Delay-Sensitive Wireless Multimedia Transmission , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[24]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Computational-Mechanism Design: A Call to Arms , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[25]  Mihaela van der Schaar,et al.  Cross-layer wireless multimedia transmission: challenges, principles, and new paradigms , 2005, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[26]  Soung Chang Liew,et al.  Proportional fairness in wireless LANs and ad hoc networks , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005.

[27]  Jens-Rainer Ohm,et al.  Three-dimensional subband coding with motion compensation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[28]  Michael Luby,et al.  PET - priority encoding transmission , 1995, High-Speed Networking for Multimedia Applications.