Computational Cognitive Science

The Journal Computational Cognitive Science is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand.Itis an international and interdisciplinary journal that provides a forum for cross-disciplinary research contributions and debate relating to all aspects of the computational modelling of cognitive theories, and the implementation of intelligent systems that implicitly or explicitly draw on or inform research across multiple cognitive science disciplines. Specific themes of interest include the acquisition of language and ontology, integrated models of sensory-motor perception and interaction, affect and emotion, gesture and expression, cognition and consciousness, and/or implemented or implementable systems based on computational or robotic models and cognitive or evolutionary theory. Contributions will overlap some or all of Artificial Intelligence, Autonomous Robotics, Behavioural Science, Biomedical Science, Brain Science, Cogniti ve Linguistics, Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cognitive Systems, Computational Intelligence, Computational Psycholinguistics, Developmental and Evolutionary Robotics, Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Human Factors Evaluation, Human Computer Interface, Image Processing, Intelligent Systems, Natural Language Learning, Neural Networks, Speech Processing, Theory of Computation, Theory of Mind, Virtual Reality, and the many other research foci, methodologies and application areas of Cognitive Science and Computational Intelligence.

[1]  Brian Roark,et al.  Probabilistic Top-Down Parsing and Language Modeling , 2001, CL.

[2]  R. Koenker,et al.  The Gaussian hare and the Laplacian tortoise: computability of squared-error versus absolute-error estimators , 1997 .

[3]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Using Speakers ’ Referential Intentions to Model Early Cross-Situational Word Learning , 2022 .

[4]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[5]  Zhenguo Li,et al.  Constrained clustering by spectral kernel learning , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[6]  Michel Vidal-Naquet,et al.  Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  R. Levy.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  A. E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems , 2000 .

[10]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[11]  Frank Keller,et al.  Incremental, Predictive Parsing with Psycholinguistically Motivated Tree-Adjoining Grammar , 2013, CL.

[12]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Rules and Similarity in Concept Learning , 1999, NIPS.

[13]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Matrix analysis , 1985, Statistical Inference for Engineers and Data Scientists.

[14]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Rapid Word Learning Under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics , 2007, Psychological science.

[15]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[16]  R. Nosofsky.  Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  R. Rifkin,et al.  Notes on Regularized Least Squares , 2007 .

[18]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A Generalized Representer Theorem , 2001, COLT/EuroCOLT.

[19]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[20]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  A Primer on Probabilistic Inference , 2008 .

[21]  A. Householder,et al.  Discussion of a set of points in terms of their mutual distances , 1938 .

[22]  Pablo A. Parrilo,et al.  Guaranteed Minimum-Rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Nuclear Norm Minimization , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[23]  W. Marslen-Wilson.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[24]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Everything old is new again: a fresh look at historical approaches in machine learning , 2002 .

[25]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses , 2010, Cognition.

[26]  C. Clifton,et al.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Computational Modeling in Cognition: Principles and Practice , 2010 .

[28]  Daniel Jurafsky,et al.  A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Ali Borji,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Human-Model Agreement in Visual Saliency Modeling: A Comparative Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[30]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[31]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. , 1982, Psychological review.

[33]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Comparing categorization models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[35]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  A temporal ratio model of memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[36]  George Lindfield,et al.  Numerical Methods Using MATLAB , 1998 .

[37]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search , 2005, Nature.

[38]  Roger Levy,et al.  A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input , 2008, EMNLP 2008.

[39]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.