An Analysis of Secondary Mathematics Textbooks With Regard to Technology Integration

[1]  M. Mariotti.  Introduction to Proof: The Mediation of a Dynamic Software Environment , 2000 .

[2]  Milan Sherman,et al.  Using Appropriate Tools Strategically for Instruction. , 2015 .

[3]  Michael P Marder,et al.  Classroom Observation and Value‐Added Models Give Complementary Information About Quality of Mathematics Teaching , 2015 .

[4]  Keith R. Leatham,et al.  Research On Graphing Calculators at the Secondary Level: Implications for Mathematics Teacher Education , 2005 .

[5]  Candace Walkington,et al.  A comparison of symbol -precedence view in investigative and conventional textbooks used in algebra courses , 2016 .

[6]  Margaret L. Niess,et al.  Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. , 2005 .

[7]  M. Stein,et al.  Instructional Tasks and the Development of Student Capacity to Think and Reason: An Analysis of the Relationship between Teaching and Learning in a Reform Mathematics Project , 1996 .

[8]  The Presentation of Technology for Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Textbooks: Content Courses for Elementary Teachers , 2017 .

[9]  Diler Oner.  The Role of Dynamic Geometry Software in High School Geometry Curricula: An Analysis of Proof Tasks , 2009 .

[10]  Denisse R. Thompson,et al.  Opportunities to Learn Reasoning and Proof in High School Mathematics Textbooks , 2012 .

[11]  D. Ben-Zvi.  Toward Understanding the Role of Technological Tools in Statistical Learning , 2000 .

[12]  Karen Hollebrands,et al.  Preparing to Teach Mathematics With Technology: An Integrated Approach to Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2008 .

[13]  Milan Sherman,et al.  The Role of Technology in Supporting Students’ Mathematical Thinking: Extending the Metaphors of Amplifier and Reorganizer , 2014 .

[14]  James E. Tarr,et al.  Curriculum and implementation effects on high school students' mathematics learning from curricula representing Subject-specific and integrated content organizations , 2013 .

[15]  Lorraine M. Males,et al.  The Mathematical Nature of Reasoning-and-Proving Opportunities in Geometry Textbooks , 2014 .

[16]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[17]  M. K. Heid,et al.  The Technological Revolution and the Reform of School Mathematics , 1997, American Journal of Education.

[18]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[19]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[20]  Margaret S. Smith,et al.  Mathematical Tasks as a Framework for Reflection: From Research to Practice , 1998 .

[21]  James E. Tarr,et al.  The Effects of Content Organization and Curriculum Implementation on Students' Mathematics Learning in Second-Year High School Courses , 2013 .

[22]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Beyond Amplification: Using the Computer To Reorganize Mental Functioning. Technical Report No. 38. , 1985 .

[23]  J. Fey,et al.  Effects of Standards-Based Mathematics Education: A Study of the Core-plus Mathematics Project Algebra and Functions Strand , 2000 .

[24]  E. Sánchez,et al.  Influential Aspects of Dynamic Geometry Activities in the Construction of Proofs , 2005 .

[25]  S. Chinn.  A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  R. Marrades,et al.  Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment , 2000 .

[27]  Larry Cuban.  Oversold and Underused , 2001 .

[28]  Robert E. Reys,et al.  From the Written to the Enacted Curricula: The Intermediary Role of Middle School Mathematics Teachers in Shaping Students' Opportunity to Learn , 2006 .

[29]  James E. Tarr,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE LEVELS OF COGITIVE DEMAND REQUIRED BY PROBABILITY TASKS IN MIDDLE GRADES MATHEMATICS TEXTBOOKS , 2007, STATISTICS EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL.