Design for Affordability in Complex Systems and Programs Using Tradespace-based Affordability Analysis

Abstract With growing emphasis on affordability, the conceptual design of complex systems and programs is no longer confined to maximizing technical performance, but also to minimizing cost and schedule related attributes. By defining affordability as the property of becoming or remaining feasible relative to resource needs and resource constraints over time, Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration and Epoch-Era Analysis can be used to find affordable solutions. Single-epoch, multi-epoch and single- era analysis were conducted for a Space Tug program case study to demonstrate the application of these tradespace-based methods and a design with the best tradeoffs among performance, cost and schedule factors was obtained.

[1]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[2]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Anticipatory capacity: Leveraging model-based approaches to design systems for dynamic futures , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Model-Based Systems Engineering.

[3]  R. R. Kneece,et al.  The Major Causes of Cost Growth in Defense Acquisition Volume I: Executive Summary , 2009 .

[4]  Adam Michael Ross,et al.  Managing unarticulated value : changeability in multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2006 .

[5]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Multi-attribute tradespace exploration for survivability , 2013 .

[6]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Investigating Relationships and Semantic Sets amongst System Lifecycle Properties (Ilities) , 2012 .

[7]  Nathan P. Diller,et al.  Utilizing Multiple Attribute Tradespace Exploration with Concurrent Design for creating aerospace systems requirements , 2002 .

[8]  W. M. Kroshl,et al.  Affordability Analysis for DARPA Programs , 2000 .

[9]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm , 2005 .

[10]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as Front End for Effective Space System Design , 2004 .

[11]  M. E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Mitigating contextual uncertainties with valuable changeability analysis in the multi-epoch domain , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Systems Conference SysCon 2012.

[12]  Marcus Shihong Wu,et al.  Design for affordability in defense and aerospace systems using tradespace-based methods , 2014 .

[13]  Robert E. Bitten,et al.  Affordability assessments to support strategic planning and decisions at NASA , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[14]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[15]  Jay Clark Beesemyer.  Empirically characterizing evolvability and changeability in engineering systems , 2012 .

[16]  D. Rhodes,et al.  Enabling Design for Affordability: An Epoch-Era Analysis Approach , 2013 .

[17]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[18]  Hugh McManus,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE ORBITAL TRANSFER VEHICLE TRADE SPACE , 2003 .