Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Top-Down Digital Light Processing Additive Manufacturing

Digital light processing (DLP) as a vat photopolymerization technique is one of the most popular three-dimensional (3D) printing methods, where chains are formed between liquid photocurable resin molecules to crosslink them and solidify the liquid resin using ultraviolet light. The DLP technique is inherently complex and the part accuracy depends on the process parameters that have to be chosen based on the fluid (resin) properties. In the present work, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are presented for top-down DLP as photocuring 3D printing. The effects of fluid viscosity, travelling speed of build part, travelling speed ratio (ratio of the up-to-down traveling speeds of build part), printed layer thickness, and travel distance considering 13 various cases are scrutinized by the developed model to obtain a stability time of fluid interface. The stability time describes the time it takes for the fluid interface to show minimum fluctuations. According to the simulations, a higher viscosity leads to prints with higher stability time. However, lower stability times in the printed layers are caused by a higher traveling speed ratio (TSR). The variation in settling times with TSR is extremely small in comparison to that of viscosity and travelling speed variations. As a result, a declining trend can be detected for the stability time by increasing the printed layer thickness, while by enhancing the travel distance values, the stability time demonstrated a descending pattern. In total, it was revealed that it is essential to choose optimal process parameters for achieving practical results. Moreover, the numerical model can assist in the optimizing the process parameters.

[1]  Dagmar R. D’hooge,et al.  Melt exit flow modelling and experimental validation for fused filament fabrication: From Newtonian to non-Newtonian effects , 2022, Journal of Manufacturing Processes.

[2]  Chuanzhen Huang,et al.  Rheological behavior and curing deformation of paste containing 85 wt% Al2O3 ceramic during SLA-3D printing , 2022, Ceramics International.

[3]  O. S. Korkunova,et al.  Photosensitive thiol–ene composition for DLP 3D printing of thermally stable polymer materials , 2022, Mendeleev Communications.

[4]  D. B. Pedersen,et al.  Numerical Predictions of Bottom Layer Stability in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing , 2022, JOM.

[5]  Yonghao Luo,et al.  Research on the effects of surface modification of ceramic powder on cure performance during digital light processing (DLP) , 2021, Ceramics International.

[6]  D. B. Pedersen,et al.  Stability and deformations of deposited layers in material extrusion additive manufacturing , 2021 .

[7]  Zhaolian Jiang,et al.  Theoretical modeling based on stress wave propagation and experimental verification of residual stress in stereolithography printed ZrO2 ceramic suspensions , 2021 .

[8]  Zhe Zhao,et al.  High‐Quality Translucent Alumina Ceramic Through Digital Light Processing Stereolithography Method , 2021, Advanced Engineering Materials.

[9]  Shichang Zhao,et al.  Fabrication of porous β-TCP/58S bioglass scaffolds via top-down DLP printing with high solid loading ceramic-resin slurry , 2021, Materials Chemistry and Physics.

[10]  Zhe Zhao,et al.  Experimental investigation on bending behaviour of ZrO2 honeycomb sandwich structures prepared by DLP stereolithography , 2020 .

[11]  D. B. Pedersen,et al.  Numerical modeling of the polymer flow through the hot-end in filament-based material extrusion additive manufacturing , 2020 .

[12]  Thomas Juul Andersen,et al.  Modelling of 3D concrete printing based on computational fluid dynamics , 2020 .

[13]  M. Gelinsky,et al.  3D printing of hydrogels: Rational design strategies and emerging biomedical applications , 2020 .

[14]  Haoyuan Quan,et al.  Photo-curing 3D printing technique and its challenges , 2020, Bioactive materials.

[15]  N. Ngadiman Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D Printing Of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Biopolymer, Commercially Available Ultra-High And Tough (UHT) Resin And Maghemite (Γ-Fe2O3) Nanoparticles Mixture For Tissue Engineering Scaffold Application , 2019, Advanced Materials Letters.

[16]  Changxue Xu,et al.  Digital light processing (DLP) 3D-printing technology and photoreactive polymers in fabrication of modified-release tablets. , 2019, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[17]  John Fisher,et al.  3D printing in cell culture systems and medical applications. , 2018, Applied physics reviews.

[18]  K. Costa,et al.  3D Printing a Mechanically-Tunable Acrylate Resin on a Commercial DLP-SLA Printer. , 2018, Additive manufacturing.

[19]  Shen Ning,et al.  Addressing Unmet Clinical Needs with 3D Printing Technologies , 2018, Advanced healthcare materials.

[20]  Simon Gaisford,et al.  Reshaping drug development using 3D printing. , 2018, Drug discovery today.

[21]  Simon Gaisford,et al.  3D Printing Pharmaceuticals: Drug Development to Frontline Care. , 2018, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[22]  T. Chartier,et al.  Development of a numerical simulation model for predicting the curing of ceramic systems in the stereolithography process , 2018, Journal of the European Ceramic Society.

[23]  Kyung Hyun Choi,et al.  3D printing for soft robotics – a review , 2018, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[24]  Feng Zhang,et al.  3D printing technologies for electrochemical energy storage , 2017 .

[25]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Emerging 3D‐Printed Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices: A Critical Review , 2017 .

[26]  Dana M Spence,et al.  Recent Advances in Analytical Chemistry by 3D Printing. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[27]  L. Murr Frontiers of 3D Printing/Additive Manufacturing: from Human Organs to Aircraft Fabrication† , 2016 .

[28]  B. Bhandari,et al.  3d printing technologies applied for food design: Status and prospects , 2016 .

[29]  Liz Nickels,et al.  AM and aerospace: an ideal combination , 2015 .

[30]  S Sánchez,et al.  Applications of three-dimensional (3D) printing for microswimmers and bio-hybrid robotics. , 2015, Lab on a chip.

[31]  Jesper Henri Hattel,et al.  Cellwise conservative unsplit advection for the volume of fluid method , 2015, J. Comput. Phys..

[32]  R. Johnson Custom labware: Chemical creativity with 3D printing. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[33]  Yousef Saad,et al.  Iterative methods for sparse linear systems , 2003 .

[34]  Xiang Zhang,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigations on microstereolithography of ceramics , 2002 .

[35]  M. Kroiher,et al.  Morphological chimeras of larvae and adults in a hydrozoan--insights into the control of pattern formation and morphogenesis. , 2000, The International journal of developmental biology.

[36]  T. Manteuffel,et al.  A taxonomy for conjugate gradient methods , 1990 .

[37]  Yong Huang,et al.  Theoretical prediction and experimental validation of the digital light processing (DLP) working curve for photocurable materials , 2021 .

[38]  Thomas Juul Andersen,et al.  Influence of Processing Parameters on the Layer Geometry in 3D Concrete Printing: Experiments and Modelling , 2020 .

[39]  Jie Sun,et al.  A Review on 3D Printing for Customized Food Fabrication , 2015 .

[40]  R. Howe,et al.  3d printing of graphene-polymer composites , 2014 .

[41]  Richard Barrett,et al.  Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods , 1994, Other Titles in Applied Mathematics.

[42]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries , 1981 .