A modeling investigation on optimizing the design of forward osmosis hollow fiber modules

Abstract Forward osmosis (FO) is an emerging osmotically driven membrane process, and its applications are becoming diversified. As one important membrane configuration, hollow fiber modules have been applied to some innovative FO processes, e.g., osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR). Aside from the inherent concentration polarization (CP) phenomena, new challenges are posed by the coupled concentrating and dilution effects in the design of FO hollow fiber modules. In this paper, a mathematical model is therefore developed to account for the evolution of the local performances within the FO hollow fiber module and to evaluate the global performances of interest. Then, this model is employed to theoretically investigate the filtration behaviors of the FO hollow fiber module by using the well-defined dimensionless groups, which indicates the complex interplay among a variety of design parameters. Particularly, the optimization objectives are focused on enhancing the module-averaged FO efficiency and avoiding the severe concentration variations in the module channels. In terms of the simulation results, some criteria are obtained for optimizing the operating conditions (flow configuration, inlet concentration level, inlet flow rate), the hollow fiber characteristics (fiber length), and the FO membrane properties (active layer selectivity, support layer transport resistance). This work provides deep insights into the design of the FO hollow fiber module, and could be readily modified to accommodate more complicated cases.

[1]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis , 1976 .

[2]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[3]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[5]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Forward osmosis extractors , 1976 .

[7]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[8]  Gary L. Amy,et al.  Well-constructed cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis: Minimized internal concentration polarization with an ultra-thin selective layer , 2010 .

[9]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Spacer characterization and pressure drop modelling in spacer-filled channels for ultrafiltration☆ , 1994 .

[10]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Boric acid permeation in forward osmosis membrane processes: modeling, experiments, and implications. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Rong Wang,et al.  Fabrication of novel poly(amide–imide) forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes with a positively charged nanofiltration-like selective layer , 2011 .

[12]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Spiral wound modules and spacers - Review and analysis , 2004 .

[14]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .

[15]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[16]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[17]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of Crossflow Membrane Filter Geometry and Shear Rate on Colloidal Fouling in Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Separations , 2002 .

[19]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[20]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane , 2010 .

[21]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Concentration of brine by forward osmosis: Performance and influence of membrane structure , 2008 .

[22]  S. Vigneswaran,et al.  Modeling and optimizing submerged hollow fiber membrane modules , 2002 .

[23]  Ik-Tae Yeom,et al.  Optimization model of submerged hollow fiber membrane modules , 2004 .

[24]  Peter Harriott,et al.  Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering , 2004 .

[25]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2008 .

[26]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[27]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[28]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Modeling double-skinned FO membranes , 2011 .

[29]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes , 2008 .

[30]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: Membrane performance under elevated salt environment , 2011 .

[31]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Impacts of salinity on the performance of high retention membrane bioreactors for water reclamation: A review. , 2010, Water research.

[32]  E R Cornelissen,et al.  The innovative osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) for reuse of wastewater. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[33]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .

[34]  Qian Yang,et al.  Cellulose acetate nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis processes , 2010 .

[35]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Network modeling for studying the effect of support structure on internal concentration polarization , 2011 .

[36]  J. Stoer,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2002 .

[37]  R. Field,et al.  Mass transfer performance for hollow fibre modules with shell-side axial feed flow: using an engineering approach to develop a framework , 2001 .

[38]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[39]  William N. Gill,et al.  Hollow fiber reverse osmosis systems analysis and design , 1973 .

[40]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis , 2009 .

[41]  Dezhong Xiao,et al.  The role of physical and chemical parameters on forward osmosis membrane fouling during algae separa , 2011 .

[42]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Colloidal interactions and fouling of NF and RO membranes: a review. , 2011, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[43]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[44]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[45]  Rong Wang,et al.  Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: Implications for FO membrane selection a , 2011 .

[46]  H. Matsuyama,et al.  Study of mass transfer characteristics for a hollow fiber reverse osmosis module , 2008 .

[47]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[48]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module , 2010 .