The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk

Empirical examinations of the "social amplification of risk" framework are rare, partly because of the difficulties in predicting when conditions likely to result in amplification effects will occur. This means that it is difficult to examine changes in risk perception that are contemporaneous with increases and/or decreases in social or media discussion of the risks associated with a particular risk event. However, the collection of attitude data before, during, and after the increased reporting of the risks of genetically modified food in the United Kingdom (spring 1999) has demonstrated that people's risk perceptions do increase and decrease in line with what might be expected upon examination of the amplification and attenuation mechanisms integral to the framework. Perceptions of benefit, however, appeared to be permanently depressed by negative reporting about genetically modified food. Trust in regulatory institutions with responsibility for protecting the public was not affected. It was concluded that the social amplification of risk framework is a useful framework for beginning to explain the potential impact on risk perceptions of a risk event, particularly if that risk event is presented to the public as a new hazard occurring in a crisis context.

[1]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[2]  L. Frewer,et al.  RISK PERCEPTION, SOCIAL TRUST, AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING : IMPLICATIONS FOR EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES , 1999 .

[3]  Richard Shepherd,et al.  Public Concerns in the United Kingdom about General and Specific Applications of Genetic Engineering: Risk, Benefit, and Ethics , 1997, Science, technology & human values.

[4]  J. Cade,et al.  How could the BSE crisis affect nutrient intake? Comparison of beef and non-beef eating meat eaters from the UK Women's Cohort Study , 1998, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[5]  R Shepherd,et al.  Public perceptions of the potential hazards associated with food production and food consumption: an empirical study. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  R. Löfstedt,et al.  Social Trust and the Management of Risk , 1999 .

[7]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and competence in citizen participation : evaluating models for environmental discourse , 1995 .

[8]  M. Siegrist Belief in gene technology : The influence of environmental attitudes and gender , 1998 .

[9]  T. Webler,et al.  Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation , 1995 .

[10]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  The Importance of Brand, Product Information and Manufacturing Process in the Development of Novel Environmentally Friendly Vegetable Oils , 1999 .

[11]  Gene Rowe,et al.  Research Note: Extending the application of the psychometric approach for assessing public perceptions of food risk: some methodological considerations , 2000 .

[12]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[13]  B. Salter,et al.  The changing governance of biotechnology: The politics of public trust in the agrifood sector , 2003 .

[14]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[15]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Reactions to information about genetic engineering: impact of source characteristics, perceived personal relevance, and persuasiveness , 1999 .

[16]  P. Slovic,et al.  Presenting uncertainty in health risk assessment: initial studies of its effects on risk perception and trust. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  M O'Brien,et al.  Have lessons been learned from the UK bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) epidemic? , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  ‘Objection’ mapping in determining group and individual concerns regarding genetic engineering , 1997 .

[19]  Susan Miles,et al.  Investigating specific concerns about different food hazards , 2001 .

[20]  R Shepherd,et al.  What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  Douglas Powell,et al.  Public Perceptions of Biotechnology , 2002 .

[22]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public perceptions of everyday food hazards: a psychometric study. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Daniel J. Fiorino Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .