The Evolution of Current Research Impact Metrics: From Bibliometrics to Altmetrics?

The prestige of publication has been based on traditional citation metrics, most commonly journal impact factor. However, the Internet has radically changed the speed, flow, and sharing of medical information. Furthermore, the explosion of social media, along with development of popular professional and scientific websites and blogs, has led to the need for alternative metrics, known as altmetrics, to quantify the wider impact of research. We explore the evolution of current research impact metrics and examine the evolving role of altmetrics in measuring the wider impact of research. We suggest that altmetrics used in research evaluation should be part of an informed peer-review process such as traditional metrics. Moreover, results based on altmetrics must not lead to direct decision making about research, but instead, should be used to assist experts in making decisions. Finally, traditional and alternative metrics should complement, not replace, each other in the peer-review process.

[1]  Scott Chamberlain,et al.  Consuming Article-Level Metrics: Observations and Lessons , 2013 .

[2]  Sibele Fausto,et al.  Blogging : Indexing and Registering the Change in Science 2 . 0 , 2012 .

[3]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications , 2014, Scientometrics.

[4]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[6]  Cameron Neylon,et al.  Rethinking Impact: Applying Altmetrics to Southern African Research , 2014 .

[7]  Jean Liu,et al.  Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective , 2013 .

[8]  Sarah Barbrow,et al.  A Look at Altmetrics and Its Growing Significance to Research Libraries , 2013 .

[9]  Nicolás Robinson-García,et al.  The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[11]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication , 2014, Scientometrics.

[12]  Anne E. Rauh,et al.  Introduction to Altmetrics for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Librarians , 2013 .

[13]  Emily S. Darling,et al.  The role of twitter in the life cycle of a scientific publication , 2013, ArXiv.

[14]  Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras,et al.  Altmetrics: New Indicators for Scientific Communication in Web 2.0 , 2013, ArXiv.

[15]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..