Usability and Feasibility of Data-Based Instruction for Students with Intensive Writing Needs

A small proportion of students do not benefit sufficiently from standard intervention protocols and require more intensive, individualized instruction. Data-based instruction (DBI) has a strong evidence base for addressing students’ intensive academic needs, yet it is not widely implemented. In this study, we explored the usability and feasibility of a professional development system to support teachers’ use of DBI in writing. Data analyzed using a mixed-methods design revealed that teachers perceived supports such as coaching as facilitators of DBI implementation, whereas access to materials and external factors such as time conflicts presented challenges. Teachers made statistically significant growth from pretest to posttest on a measure of DBI knowledge and skills, implemented DBI components with fidelity, and reported that time spent on DBI activities decreased each week, supporting its usability and feasibility. Findings suggest that DBI is usable and feasible when teachers are provided ongoing professional development supports.

[1]  Alison G. Boardman,et al.  What Does it Take to Scale up and Sustain Evidence-Based Practices? , 2013 .

[2]  L. Fuchs,et al.  The “Blurring” of Special Education in a New Continuum of General Education Placements and Services , 2010 .

[3]  C. Snow,et al.  Reading Next: A Vision for Action and Research in Middle and High School Literacy , 2004 .

[4]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures , 2009 .

[5]  Erica S. Lembke,et al.  Early Writing Intervention: A Best Evidence Synthesis , 2017, Journal of learning disabilities.

[6]  Kristen L. McMaster,et al.  Effects of Early Writing Intervention Delivered Within a Data-Based Instruction Framework , 2017 .

[7]  D. Chard.  Maintaining the Relationship Between Science and Special Education , 2004, Journal of learning disabilities.

[8]  S. Deno,et al.  Effects of Curriculum within Curriculum-Based Measurement , 1991, Exceptional children.

[9]  Alison G. Boardman,et al.  Addressing the “Research Gap” in Special Education Through Mixed Methods , 2011 .

[10]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  What We Know About Using Research Findings , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[11]  C. Newman.  The Children and Youth We Serve : A National Picture of the Characteristics of Students with Emotional Disturbances Receiving Special Education , 2022 .

[12]  N. Zigmond.  Special Education at a Crossroads , 2001 .

[13]  Keith E Stanovich,et al.  Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy , 2004, Annals of dyslexia.

[14]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[15]  E. Wijsman,et al.  Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: under-recognized and under-treated. , 2008, Journal of school psychology.

[16]  C. Rosenquist,et al.  Introduction to the TEC Special Issue on Data-Based Individualization , 2014 .

[17]  J. Klingner,et al.  A Collaborative Effort to Enhance Reading and Writing Instruction in Inclusion Classrooms , 1998 .

[18]  S. Graham,et al.  A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. , 2007 .

[19]  Phyllis K. Mirkin,et al.  Data-Based Program Modification: A Manual. , 1977 .

[20]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. , 1998 .

[21]  C. Urdaneta.  For the children. , 2004 .

[22]  Daniel J. Boudah,et al.  The Research to Practice Projects: Lessons Learned About Changing Teacher Practice , 2001 .

[23]  Using Curriculum-Based Measurement to Improve Students Achievement in a Special Education University Course , 2013 .

[24]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  The Effects of Frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and Evaluation on Pedagogy, Student Achievement, and Student Awareness of Learning , 1984 .

[25]  Robert T. Jiménez,et al.  Qualitative Studies in Special Education , 2005 .

[26]  Nilanjana Mukherjee,et al.  What does it take to scale up and sustain rural sanitation beyond projects , 2009 .

[27]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Professional Development for Data-Based Instruction in Early Writing: Tools, Learning, and Collaborative Support , 2018 .

[28]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Using Curriculum‐Based Measurement to Improve Student Achievement: Review of Research , 2005 .

[29]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Bringing Research‐Based Practice in Reading Intervention to Scale , 2003 .

[30]  K. Novak,et al.  Collaborative effort , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[31]  Apryl L. Poch,et al.  Supporting teachers’ use of data-based instruction to improve students’ early writing skills. , 2019 .

[32]  S. Graham,et al.  Teacher Efficacy in Writing: A Construct Validation With Primary Grade Teachers , 2001 .

[33]  S. Otaiba,et al.  Improving Professional Development to Enhance Reading Outcomes for Students in Special Education. , 2016, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[34]  Amy K. Kunkel,et al.  Effects of Data–Based Individualization for Students with Intensive Learning Needs: A Meta–Analysis , 2018, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice.

[35]  C. Greenwood,et al.  The Research to Practice Gap in Special Education , 2001 .

[36]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[37]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[38]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Students Demonstrating Persistent Low Response to Reading Intervention: Three Case Studies. , 2009 .

[39]  Joy Stapleton,et al.  Preventing School Failure : Alternative Education for Children and Youth , 2012 .