Theoretical predictions of harmonic generation from submicron ultrasound contrast agents for nonlinear biomedical ultrasound imaging

Submicron ultrasound contrast agents have aroused attention for their significant promise in ultrasonic contrast/molecular imaging, targeted therapy and echo particle imaging velocimetry. However, nonlinear acoustic properties of submicron encapsulated gas bubbles for ultrasonic applications are still not clearly understood. In this paper, nonlinear acoustic emission characteristics from submicron bubbles were examined using a numerical study. The modified RP equation incorporating viscosity, acoustic radiation, thermal effects and encapsulated shell was used to study single bubble dynamics. Further, a size integration method, shown previously to be useful in prediction of backscatter spectra from groups of bubbles, was applied to analyse response from a bubble population. We show that bubbles with radii (200-500 nm) produce significant subharmonic and ultraharmonic components of the backscatter spectrum, while smaller bubbles (<200 nm) provide substantial second harmonic components. Additionally, nanoscale bubbles (<100 nm) produce very low backscatter amplitudes and thus may not be useful with the use of current ultrasound technology. Analysing optimal ultrasound driving pressures and bubbles size ranges for maximal subharmonic and ultraharmonic signals showed that sub and ultraharmonic mode nonlinear imaging methods may be potentially competitive for larger size bubbles (>200 nm) in providing proper contrast-to-tissue signal ratios.

[1]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages. , 2001, Ultrasonics.

[2]  E. Wisner,et al.  The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Seeing Within: Molecular Imaging of the Cardiovascular System , 2004, Circulation research.

[4]  P M Shankar,et al.  Subharmonic generation from ultrasonic contrast agents. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents , 2004 .

[6]  R K Jain,et al.  Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. , 1995, Cancer research.

[7]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2003, Circulation.

[8]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Samuel A Wickline,et al.  Nanotechnology for molecular imaging and targeted therapy. , 2003, Circulation.

[10]  J. Wu,et al.  Measurements of the nonlinearity parameter B/A of contrast agents. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  P. Shankar,et al.  Subharmonic signal generation from contrast agents in simulated neovessels. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic signatures of submicron contrast agents , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  J. Young,et al.  Thermodynamic and transport properties of gases for use in solid oxide fuel cell modelling , 2002 .

[14]  E. Unger,et al.  Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles. , 2004, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[15]  R. Appel,et al.  Possibility of Microcavitation from Diagnostic Ultrasound , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  R. Jain,et al.  Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  H. Medwin,et al.  Counting bubbles acoustically: a review , 1977 .

[18]  R. Apfel,et al.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  R. Apfel,et al.  An improved theory for the prediction of microcavitation thresholds , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  B. Schmitz,et al.  How snapping shrimp snap: through cavitating bubbles. , 2000, Science.

[21]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[22]  F Forsberg,et al.  Destruction of contrast microbubbles and the association with inertial cavitation. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  D. May,et al.  Nondestructive subharmonic imaging , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Thermal effects and damping mechanisms in the forced radial oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids , 1977 .

[25]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of contrast agent destruction , 2000 .

[26]  F Forsberg,et al.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[27]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  The thermal behaviour of oscillating gas bubbles , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[28]  F. Duck Nonlinear acoustics in diagnostic ultrasound. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  F. T. ten Cate,et al.  Super harmonic imaging: a new imaging technique for improved contrast detection. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Development and characterization of a nano-scale contrast agent. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[31]  Jean Hertzberg,et al.  Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[32]  D. Lohse,et al.  Response of bubbles to diagnostic ultrasound: a unifying theoretical approach , 1998, cond-mat/9805217.

[33]  P. Couvreur,et al.  Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[34]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound contrast imaging: current and new potential methods. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[35]  S Otto,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 2. Experiment. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[36]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Advantages in using multifrequency excitation of contrast microbubbles for enhancing echo particle image velocimetry techniques: initial numerical studies using rectangular and triangular waves. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[37]  S A Wickline,et al.  Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy. , 2003, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[38]  P M Shankar,et al.  Advantages of subharmonic over second harmonic backscatter for contrast-to-tissue echo enhancement. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[39]  R. Shandas,et al.  Gaussian-integration technique to predict backscatter characteristics from ultrasound contrast agents , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[40]  P. Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound contrast agents , 2004, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[41]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[42]  D. Khismatullin Resonance frequency of microbubbles: effect of viscosity. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  A. Needles,et al.  High frequency nonlinear B-scan imaging of microbubble contrast agents , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[44]  F Forsberg,et al.  Subharmonic imaging of contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[45]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Dynamics of therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[46]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Predicting backscatter characteristics from micron- and submicron-scale ultrasound contrast agents using a size-integration technique , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[47]  Jean Hertzberg,et al.  Noninvasive Measurement of Steady and Pulsating Velocity Profiles and Shear Rates in Arteries Using Echo PIV: In Vitro Validation Studies , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  L. Hoff,et al.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  K. Soetanto,et al.  Fundamental studies on contrast images from different-sized microbubbles: analytical and experimental studies. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.