Neuronal replacement strategies for spinal cord injury.

Functional recovery following central nervous system (CNS) trauma or neurodegenerative disease is likely to require the transplantation of exogenous neurons. Given the logistical constraints of the potential widespread use of fetal human CNS tissues for therapeutic treatment, alternative sources of exogenous neurons for grafting will likely be necessary. Described here are studies examining the use of an immortalized, CNS-derived, neuronal precursor cell line, RN33B, as such a source. Results demonstrate that RN33B cells show remarkable plasticity to respond to local microenvironmental cues to differentiate in a direction that is morphologically indistinguishable from endogenous neurons at the site of transplantation. Concomitantly, the adult CNS retains the capacity to direct very specific differentiation of those engrafted precursor cells. However, the type and extent of site-specific appropriate differentiation is influenced by the type and extent of the lesion at the graft site. Attempts at immortalizing human CNS cells wtih similar approaches led to significant chromosomal aberrations, obviating such a strategy for therapeutic treatment. Thus, we utilized mitogen expansion of fetal human spinal cord cells as a means to generate populations of undifferentiated human neural precursor cells. Cells were expanded in the presence of epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor 2, were readily passaged, and retained a pluriopotential to differentiate into neurons and astrocytes through at least 4 passages, after which the proliferating precursors became restricted to the astrocytic lineage. Further delineation of the variable needed to maintain these cells as undifferentiated, pluripotent precursor cells should ultimately enable examination of the ability of these cells to restore function in the damaged CNS.

[1]  F. Gage,et al.  Survival and differentiation of adult neuronal progenitor cells transplanted to the adult brain. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  F. Gage,et al.  Isolation, characterization, and use of stem cells from the CNS. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[3]  C. Cepko,et al.  Multipotent neural cell lines can engraft and participate in development of mouse cerebellum , 1992, Cell.

[4]  P. Stieg,et al.  Transplantation of neural progenitor and stem cells: developmental insights may suggest new therapies for spinal cord and other CNS dysfunction. , 1999, Journal of neurotrauma.

[5]  Miles G. Cunningham,et al.  Region-specific differentiation of the hippocampal stem cell line HiB5 upon implantation into the developing mammalian brain , 1991, Cell.

[6]  S. Whittemore,et al.  Altered differentiation of CNS neural progenitor cells after transplantation into the injured adult rat spinal cord. , 1997, Cell transplantation.

[7]  S. Weiss,et al.  Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. , 1992, Science.

[8]  E. Parati,et al.  Isolation and intracerebral grafting of nontransformed multipotential embryonic human CNS stem cells. , 1999, Journal of neurotrauma.

[9]  M. Webb,et al.  A monoclonal antibody, Py, distinguishes different classes of hippocampal neurons , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Norenberg,et al.  Isolation and characterization of conditionally immortalized astrocyte cell lines derived from adult human spinal cord , 1994, Glia.

[11]  S. Whittemore,et al.  Selective Hippocampal Lesions Differentially Affect the Phenotypic Fate of Transplanted Neuronal Precursor Cells , 1996, Experimental Neurology.