Haptic assistance that restricts use of redundant solutions is detrimental to motor learning

Understanding the use of haptic assistance to facilitate motor learning is a critical issue, especially in the context of tasks requiring control of motor variability. However, the question of how haptic assistance should be designed in tasks with redundancy, where multiple solutions are available, is currently unknown. Here we examined the effect of haptic assistance that either allowed or restricted the use of redundant solutions on the learning of a bimanual steering task. 60 college-aged participants practiced steered a single cursor placed in between their hands along a smooth W-shaped track of a certain width as quickly as possible. Haptic assistance was either applied at the ‘task’ level using a force channel that only constrained the cursor to the track, allowing for the use of different hand trajectories, or (ii) the ‘individual effector’ level using a force channel that constrained each hand to a specific trajectory. In addition, we also examined the effect of ‘fading’ – i.e., decreasing assistance with practice to reduce dependence on haptic assistance. Results showed all groups improved with practice - however, groups with haptic assistance at the individual effector level performed worse than those at the task level. Moreover, fading of assistance did not offer learning benefits over constant assistance. Overall, the results suggest that haptic assistance is not effective for motor learning when it restricts the use of redundant solutions.

[1]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  It's not (only) the mean that matters: variability, noise and exploration in skill learning , 2018, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[2]  R. Colombo,et al.  Taking a Lesson From Patients' Recovery Strategies to Optimize Training During Robot-Aided Rehabilitation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Wanjoo Park,et al.  Combining Full and Partial Haptic Guidance Improves Handwriting Skills Development , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[4]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy , 2003, Auton. Robots.

[5]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy) , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  J Liu,et al.  Learning to perform a new movement with robotic assistance: comparison of haptic guidance and visual demonstration , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  M. HenryF.,et al.  Specificity vs.generality in learning motor skill , 1968 .

[9]  C. Winstein,et al.  Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  Matthias D. Ziegler,et al.  Why Variability Facilitates Spinal Learning , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Heather Carnahan,et al.  Motor Learning Perspectives on Haptic Training for the Upper Extremities , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[14]  J. Patton,et al.  Can Robots Help the Learning of Skilled Actions? , 2009, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[15]  M. Lewek,et al.  Allowing Intralimb Kinematic Variability During Locomotor Training Poststroke Improves Kinematic Consistency: A Subgroup Analysis From a Randomized Clinical Trial , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[16]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  The influence of haptic guidance on the production of spatio-temporal patterns. , 2012, Human movement science.

[17]  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Remapping hand movements in a novel geometrical environment. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Xiaolin Liu,et al.  Contributions of online visual feedback to the learning and generalization of novel finger coordination patterns. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Etienne Burdet,et al.  A robotic teacher of Chinese handwriting , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[20]  Peter Wolf,et al.  The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  C. Shea,et al.  Specificity and variability of practice. , 1990, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[22]  Jonathan B. Dingwell,et al.  Error Correction and the Structure of Inter-Trial Fluctuations in a Redundant Movement Task , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  R. Ivry,et al.  The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Mark L Latash,et al.  Stages in learning motor synergies: a view based on the equilibrium-point hypothesis. , 2010, Human movement science.

[26]  D. Domkin,et al.  Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Progressive haptic and visual guidance for training in a virtual dynamic task , 2010, 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium.

[28]  Frank Tendick,et al.  Haptic guidance: experimental evaluation of a haptic training method for a perceptual motor skill , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[29]  A. Haith,et al.  Model-based and model-free mechanisms of human motor learning. , 2013, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[30]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: Learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[31]  Olivier White,et al.  Use-Dependent and Error-Based Learning of Motor Behaviors , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Riener,et al.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[33]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Visual versus haptic progressive guidance for training in a virtual dynamic task , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[34]  M. Latash,et al.  Practicing Elements Versus Practicing Coordination: Changes in the Structure of Variance , 2012, Journal of Motor Behavior.

[35]  Rakshith Lokesh,et al.  Differential control of task and null space variability in response to changes in task difficulty when learning a bimanual steering task , 2019, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Learning to be Lazy: Exploiting Redundancy in a Novel Task to Minimize Movement-Related Effort , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Jaime E. Duarte,et al.  Effects of robotically modulating kinematic variability on motor skill learning and motivation. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  野間 春生,et al.  Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 参加報告 , 1997 .

[39]  Herbert Heuer,et al.  Motor learning with fading and growing haptic guidance , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.