On The Geometry and Shape of Brain Sub-Manifolds

This paper develops mathematical representations for neuro-anatomically significant substructures of the brain and their variability in a population. The focus of the paper is on the neuro-anatomical variation of the geometry and the "shape" of two-dimensional surfaces in the brain. As examples, we focus on the cortical and hippocampal surfaces in an ensemble of Macaque monkeys and human MRI brains. The "shapes" of the substructures are quantified via the construction of templates; the variations are represented by defining probabilistic deformations of the template. Methods for empirically estimating probability measures on these deformations are developed by representing the deformations as Gaussian random vector fields on the embedded sub-manifolds. The Gaussian random vector fields are constructed as quadratic mean limits using complete orthonormal bases on the sub-manifolds. The complete orthonormal bases are generated using modes of vibrations of the geometries of the brain sub-manifolds. The covari...

[1]  Gary E. Christensen,et al.  Deformable Shape Models for Anatomy , 1994 .

[2]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Volumetric transformation of brain anatomy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Hierarchical brain mapping via a generalized Dirichlet solution for mapping brain manifolds , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[4]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  R. Rabbitt,et al.  3D brain mapping using a deformable neuroanatomy. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Dr. M. G. Worster Methods of Mathematical Physics , 1947, Nature.

[7]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Computerized Mappings of the Cerebral Cortex: A Multiresolution Flattening Method and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[10]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  REPRESENTATIONS OF KNOWLEDGE IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[11]  G. Christensen,et al.  Hippocampal MR imaging morphometry by means of general pattern matching. , 1996, Radiology.

[12]  Christopher J. BISHOPAbstra,et al.  Orthogonal Functions , 2022 .

[13]  W. Boothby An introduction to differentiable manifolds and Riemannian geometry , 1975 .

[14]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Morphometric tools for landmark data , 1993 .

[15]  Harry L. Van Trees,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I , 1968 .

[16]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[17]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Differential geometry of the cortical surface , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[18]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Closed-Form Solutions for Physically Based Shape Modeling and Recognition , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Bernd Hamann,et al.  Curvature Approximation for Triangulated Surfaces , 1993, Geometric Modelling.

[20]  M I Miller,et al.  Mathematical textbook of deformable neuroanatomies. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Roberto Scopigno,et al.  Using Marching Cubes on Small Machines , 1994, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..