The Gender of Water and the Pleasure of Alienation: A Critical Analysis of Visiting Hoover Dam

Hoover Dam, located on the Arizona-Nevada border and damming the Colorado River, is a well-known and often-visited place. The meanings people assign to such a structure articulate key environmental, economic and technological ideologies. An exploration of those meanings is important for understanding the forces that shape public perception and environmental policy. Specifically, this essay examines the official rhetoric of Hoover Dam from an ecofeminist perspective. Through a critical reading of the educational displays, films, plaques and other texts as well as the physical structure of the dam itself, three rhetorical strategies used in the dam's official presentation are identified. First, the Bureau of Reclamation presents the Colorado River as a chaotic, feminine entity in need of masculine control. Second, the river's rhetorical status as an Other encourages audiences to identify with the subject position of nature's master and thereby participate in the pleasures such an identity offers. Third, the Bureau uses the prevalent “common sense” of Native Americans as environmentally sensitive in combination with an “historical” Native American voice to establish the dam as both environmentally sound and a logical step in humanity's progress toward economic development and dominion over nature.

[1]  M. Deegan,et al.  The Ecofeminist Pragmatism of Charlotte Perkins Gilman , 2001 .

[2]  J. Plant Healing the wounds : the promise of ecofeminism , 1989 .

[3]  T. Steinberg “That World’s Fair Feeling”: Control of Water in 20th-Century America , 1993, Technology and Culture.

[4]  Carolyn Merchant,et al.  The death of nature : women, ecology, and the scientific revolution , 1982 .

[5]  F. Jameson Signatures of the Visible , 1990 .

[6]  D. Knight Ways of seeing , 2015, Nature.

[7]  Val Plumwood,et al.  Feminism and the Mastery of Nature , 2019, Ideals and Ideologies.

[8]  I. Birchall,et al.  Marxism and Literature , 1977 .

[9]  G. Lanza,et al.  Silenced Rivers: The Ecology and Politics of Large Dams , 1996 .

[10]  Cynthia Willett Cognition and Eros: A Critique of the Kantian Paradigm , 1991 .

[11]  Luce Irigaray,et al.  This sex which is not one , 1985 .

[12]  Cynthia K. Dohner U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , 1998 .

[13]  K. DeLuca,et al.  Image Politics: The New Rhetoric of Environmental Activism , 1999 .

[14]  Linda Vance Ecofeminism and Wilderness , 1997 .

[15]  G. Nash The Federal Landscape: An Economic History of the Twentieth-Century West , 1999 .

[16]  Philip L. Fradkin,et al.  A River No More: The Colorado River and the West , 1981 .

[17]  Geoffrey Nowell‐Smith,et al.  Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci , 2015 .

[18]  S. Rajan Time Wars , 2000 .

[19]  Louis Althusser,et al.  Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays , 1971 .

[20]  M. Reisner Cadillac Desert: The American West and Its Disappearing Water , 1987 .

[21]  Karin Ellison Hoover Dam: The Photographs of Ben Glaha, and: Glen Canyon Dammed: Inventing Lake Powell and the Canyon Country (review) , 2001 .

[22]  Lynn M. Stearney Feminism, ecofeminism, and the maternal archetype: Motherhood as a feminine universal , 1994 .

[23]  박칠림 The Hoover Dam , 1933, Nature.

[24]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[25]  G. Orenstein,et al.  Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism , 1990 .