How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods

Facing contemporary environmental crisis implies fostering agroecological innovations that take into account local ecological regulations and rely on multiple stakeholders' innovation capacities. This paper draws on two fields of literature that remain unconnected so far: participatory approaches and design sciences. It proposes an analysis grid to support a reflexive analysis of cases of implementation of three participatory design methods: ComMod (Companion Modelling for concerted management of natural resources), Forage Rummy (simulation-based board game for designing farming systems) and KCP (collective design workshops to foster innovation). This analysis highlights key features of the methods in view of agroecological innovation challenges, focusing on knowledge management and organisation for exploration.

[1]  Roger Martin-Clouaire,et al.  Diagnosis and simulation: a suitable combination to support farming systems design , 2011 .

[2]  G. Wilson Community resilience: path dependency, lock-in effects and transitional ruptures , 2014 .

[3]  Vincent Bretagnolle,et al.  The role of grassland areas within arable cropping systems for the conservation of biodiversity at the regional level. , 2011 .

[4]  W. Dare,et al.  Learning About Interdependencies and Dynamics , 2014 .

[5]  Gael Martin,et al.  A conceptual framework to support adaptation of farming systems – Development and application with Forage Rummy , 2015 .

[6]  Massimo Marraffa,et al.  Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice , 1998 .

[7]  Keith Douglass Warner,et al.  Agroecology as Participatory Science , 2008 .

[8]  Guillaume Martin,et al.  Farming system design to feed the changing world. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[9]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[10]  C. Mullon,et al.  An environmental modelling approach : the use of multi-agent simulations , 1988 .

[11]  Joanne Roberts Organizational ignorance: Towards a managerial perspective on the unknown , 2013 .

[12]  T. Lynam,et al.  A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management , 2007 .

[13]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Spatial representations are not neutral: Lessons from a participatory agent-based modelling process in a land-use conflict , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  François Bousquet,et al.  Modelling with stakeholders , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  P. Rosset,et al.  Rural Social Movements and Agroecology: Context, Theory, and Process , 2012 .

[16]  M. Etienne Companion Modelling: A Participatory Approach to Support Sustainable Development , 2010 .

[17]  Terry Marsden,et al.  Towards the real green revolution? : Exploring the conceptual dimensions of a new ecological modernisation of agriculture that could 'feed the world' , 2011 .

[18]  Guillaume Martin,et al.  Forage rummy: A game to support the participatory design of adapted livestock systems , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Eva K. Wollenberg,et al.  A Strategic Approach to Multistakeholder Negotiations , 2001 .

[20]  H. Greve Exploration and exploitation in product innovation , 2007 .

[21]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Reconceptualizing Participation for Sustainable Rural Development: Towards a Negotiation Approach , 2000 .

[22]  N. Röling,et al.  Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty , 1999 .

[23]  Philippe Debaeke,et al.  Agronomy for Sustainable Development , 2008 .

[24]  B. Cooke,et al.  Participation: the New Tyranny? , 2001 .

[25]  T. Doré,et al.  Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review , 2009, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[26]  A. P. Bos,et al.  Designing complex and sustainable agricultural production systems: an integrated and reflexive approach for the case of table egg production in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[27]  P. Fridenson Les processus d'innovation. Conception innovante et croissance des entreprises (review) , 2009 .

[28]  B. Segrestin Innovation et coopération interentreprises : comment gérer les partenariats d'exploration? , 2006 .

[29]  P. Baret,et al.  How Agricultural Research Systems Shape a Technological Regime that Develops Genetic Engineering but Locks Out Agroecological Innovations , 2009 .

[30]  Clare Ginger,et al.  Integrating knowledge, interests and values through modelling in participatory processes: dimensions of legitimacy , 2014 .

[31]  Cécile Barnaud,et al.  Equity, Power Games, and Legitimacy: Dilemmas of Participatory Natural Resource Management , 2013 .

[32]  UMRONGROJWATTHANA ARIEPongchai,et al.  Area Study Prior to Companion Modelling to Integrate Multiple Interests in Upper Watershed Management of Northern Thailand , 2008 .

[33]  V. Bretagnolle,et al.  Analyzing the Design Process of Farming Practices Ensuring Little Bustard Conservation: Lessons for Collective Landscape Management , 2012 .

[34]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Integration and Implementation Sciences: Building a New Specialisation , 2005 .

[35]  Gilles Garel,et al.  Managing exploratory innovation , 2010 .

[36]  P. Murray,et al.  Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty , 2001 .

[37]  E. Berthet Contribution à une théorie de la conception des agro-écosystèmes : Fonds écologique et inconnu commun , 2013 .

[38]  François Bousquet,et al.  Dealing with Power Games in a Companion Modelling Process: Lessons from Community Water Management in Thailand Highlands , 2010 .

[39]  R. L. McCown,et al.  Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects , 2002 .

[40]  Olivier Barreteau,et al.  Our Companion Modelling Approach , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[41]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/casp.774 Processes of Social Learning in Integrated Resources Management , 2022 .

[42]  L. Andersson,et al.  Defining goals in participatory water management: merging local visions and expert judgements , 2011 .

[43]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture , 1995 .

[44]  Benoit Weil,et al.  Design theories as languages of the unknown: insights from the German roots of systematic design (1840–1960) , 2013 .

[45]  Jeffrey Z. Rubin Models of Conflict Management , 1994 .

[46]  Marine Agogué,et al.  An introduction to innovative design - Elements and applications of C-K theory , 2014 .

[47]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Enhancing the Reflexivity of System Innovation Projects With System Analyses , 2010 .

[48]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Les processus d'innovation , 2006 .

[49]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[50]  Jeroen C.J. Groot,et al.  Gaming for smallholder participation in the design of more sustainable agricultural landscapes , 2014 .

[51]  Randall D. Jackson,et al.  Commentary: The productivity of variability: an agroecological hypothesis , 2008 .

[52]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation , 2016 .

[53]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  Design Theory and Collective Creativity: A Theoretical Framework to Evaluate KCP Process , 2009 .

[54]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[55]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[56]  T. Doré,et al.  Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review , 2009, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[57]  A. Pacey,et al.  Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research , 1989 .

[58]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[59]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[60]  A. Iles,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on A Social-Ecological Analysis of Diversified Farming Systems: Benefits, Costs, Obstacles, and Enabling Policy Frameworks Diversified Farming Systems: An Agroecological, Systems-based Alternative to Modern Industrial Agriculture , 2012 .

[61]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .