Systematic review of the stage of innovation of biological mesh for complex or contaminated abdominal wall closure

Achieving stable closure of complex or contaminated abdominal wall incisions remains challenging. This study aimed to characterize the stage of innovation for biological mesh devices used during complex abdominal wall reconstruction and to evaluate the quality of current evidence.

[1]  K. Itani,et al.  Prospective study of single-stage repair of contaminated hernias using a biologic porcine tissue matrix: the RICH Study. , 2012, Surgery.

[2]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online].

[3]  H. Lau,et al.  Ventral hernia repair with lateral component separation and onlay Biodesign graft , 2016, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[4]  I. Sutherland.  On the risk of infection. , 1991, Bulletin of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[5]  Michael A. Fallucco,et al.  Repair of abdominal wall defects with bovine pericardium. , 2009, American journal of surgery.

[6]  P. Rooney,et al.  Abdominal wall reconstruction with components separation and mesh reinforcement in complex hernia repair , 2014, BMC Surgery.

[7]  Kent R Van Sickle,et al.  A retrospective study evaluating the use of Permacol™ surgical implant in incisional and ventral hernia repair. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[8]  M. Rosen,et al.  A 5-Year Clinical Experience With Single-Staged Repairs of Infected and Contaminated Abdominal Wall Defects Utilizing Biologic Mesh , 2013, Annals of surgery.

[9]  N. Espat,et al.  Early results on the use of biomaterials as adjuvant to abdominal wall closure following cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy , 2010, World journal of surgical oncology.

[10]  S. Bachman,et al.  Prosthetic material in ventral hernia repair: how do I choose? , 2008, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[11]  Jun Liu,et al.  Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis , 2017, Surgery.

[12]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1999, American journal of infection control.

[13]  W. Hop,et al.  Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. , 2012, American journal of surgery.

[14]  Jun Liu,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  G. Fried,et al.  Biologic mesh for repair of ventral hernias in contaminated fields: long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  C. A. Rogers,et al.  Standardizing and monitoring the delivery of surgical interventions in randomized clinical trials , 2016, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  F. Luchette,et al.  Can't have one without the other: component separation plus mesh for repairing difficult incisional hernias. , 2014, Surgery.

[18]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  W. Tan,et al.  Synthetic versus Biologic Mesh in Single-Stage Repair of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects in a Contaminated Field. , 2017, Surgical infections.

[20]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  E. M. Ritter,et al.  Rives-Stoppa incisional hernia repair combined with laparoscopic separation of abdominal wall components: a novel approach to complex abdominal wall closure , 2010, Hernia.

[22]  B. Ystgaard,et al.  The use of an acellular porcine dermal collagen implant in the repair of complex abdominal wall defects: a European multicentre retrospective study , 2015, Techniques in Coloproctology.

[23]  D. Russell,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Factors Affecting Midline Incisional Hernia Rates: Analysis of 14 618 Patients , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  C. Peden,et al.  Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK Emergency Laparotomy Network. , 2012, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  J. Jeekel,et al.  Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair , 2013, Hernia.

[26]  E. Pauli,et al.  Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. , 2016, Surgery.

[27]  E. Verdaasdonk,et al.  Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Suture Versus Mesh Repair of Incisional Hernia , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[28]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[29]  Christopher J Salgado,et al.  Evaluation of porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) used in abdominal wall reconstruction. , 2009, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[30]  Retro‐rectus repair of complex incisional hernia leads to low recurrence rate , 2017, ANZ journal of surgery.

[31]  T. Pappas,et al.  Clinical application of porcine small intestinal submucosa in the management of infected or potentially contaminated abdominal defects , 2007, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[32]  E. Irwin,et al.  Repair of High-Risk Incisional Hernias and Traumatic Abdominal Wall Defects with Porcine Mesh , 2011, The American surgeon.

[33]  P. Grace,et al.  Experience with Porcine Acellular Dermal Collagen Implant in One-stage Tension-free Reconstruction of Acute and Chronic Abdominal Wall Defects , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[34]  M. Sarr,et al.  Long-term outcomes (>5-year follow-up) with porcine acellular dermal matrix (Permacol™) in incisional hernias at risk for infection , 2013, Hernia.

[35]  J. Richardson,et al.  Emergency Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Polypropylene Mesh: Short‐term Benefits Versus Long‐term Complications , 1981, Annals of surgery.

[36]  J. Fitzgerald,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy , 2013, Hernia.

[37]  J. Jeekel,et al.  A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  D. Oleynikov,et al.  Not all biologics are equal! , 2011, Hernia.

[39]  J. Bruun,et al.  Use of biological mesh in facilitation of early closure in potentially infected abdominal wall defects. , 2012, Danish medical journal.

[40]  David W. Taggart,et al.  No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations , 2009, The Lancet.

[41]  J. Jeekel,et al.  Biologic meshes are not superior to synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study with long-term follow-up evaluation , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[42]  Y. Novitsky,et al.  Outcomes of Retromuscular Porcine Biologic Mesh Repairs Using Transversus Abdominis Release Reconstruction. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[43]  Y. Panis,et al.  Bioprosthetic mesh reinforcement during temporary stoma closure decreases the rate of incisional hernia: A blinded, case-matched study in 94 patients with rectal cancer. , 2015, Surgery.

[44]  J. Frizzi,et al.  Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction. , 2006, Current surgery.

[45]  M. Abbas,et al.  Outcome of Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair with Biologic Mesh: Permacol™ versus Strattice™ , 2014, The American surgeon.

[46]  R. Reed,et al.  A Review of Available Prosthetics for Ventral Hernia Repair , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[47]  F. Eckhauser,et al.  Long-term outcomes of sandwich ventral hernia repair paired with hybrid vacuum-assisted closure. , 2016, The Journal of surgical research.

[48]  M. Rosen,et al.  Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. , 2010, Surgery.

[49]  G. Kouvelos,et al.  A comparative study of sutured versus bovine pericardium mesh abdominal closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair , 2015, Hernia.

[50]  B. Pomahac,et al.  Use of a non-cross-linked porcine dermal scaffold in abdominal wall reconstruction. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[51]  H. Harris,et al.  A critical review of biologic mesh use in ventral hernia repairs under contaminated conditions , 2013, Hernia.

[52]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. , 2000, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[53]  J. Roth,et al.  Cost of ventral hernia repair using biologic or synthetic mesh. , 2016, The Journal of surgical research.

[54]  H. Navsaria,et al.  Human in vivo cellular response to a cross‐linked acellular collagen implant , 2008, The British journal of surgery.

[55]  K. Itani,et al.  Ventral hernia repair with synthetic, composite, and biologic mesh: characteristics, indications, and infection profile. , 2012, Surgical infections.

[56]  M. Kroh,et al.  Single-center ventral hernia repair with porcine dermis collagen implant , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[57]  B. Pérez-Köhler,et al.  Mesh Infection and Hernia Repair: A Review. , 2016, Surgical infections.

[58]  A. Iacco,et al.  Single institutional experience using biological mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction. , 2014, American journal of surgery.

[59]  E. Finlayson,et al.  Outcomes Analysis of Biologic Mesh Use for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction in Clean-Contaminated and Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair , 2015, Annals of plastic surgery.

[60]  F. Pruvot,et al.  Outcome in porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement of infected abdominal wall defects: a prospective study , 2015, Hernia.

[61]  J. Jeekel,et al.  Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis , 2017, The British journal of surgery.

[62]  B. Jacob,et al.  International Hernia Collaboration Consensus on Nomenclature of Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair , 2017, World Journal of Surgery.

[63]  M. Goldblatt,et al.  Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[64]  J. Galloway,et al.  Management of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects Using Acellular Porcine Dermal Collagen , 2010, The American surgeon.

[65]  G. Jurkovich,et al.  Polypropylene mesh closure of infected abdominal wounds. , 1989, The American surgeon.

[66]  M. Nahabedian,et al.  Indications and Outcomes Following Complex Abdominal Reconstruction With Component Separation Combined With Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix Reinforcement , 2012, Annals of plastic surgery.

[67]  J. Fischer,et al.  A Risk Model and Cost Analysis of Incisional Hernia After Elective, Abdominal Surgery Based Upon 12,373 Cases , 2016, Annals of surgery.