Influence of Environmental Conditions on Methanogenic Compositions in Anaerobic Biogas Reactors

ABSTRACT The influence of environmental parameters on the diversity of methanogenic communities in 15 full-scale biogas plants operating under different conditions with either manure or sludge as feedstock was studied. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to identify dominant methanogenic members of the Archaea in the reactor samples; enriched and pure cultures were used to support the in situ identification. Dominance could be identified by a positive response by more than 90% of the total members of the Archaea to a specific group- or order-level probe. There was a clear dichotomy between the manure digesters and the sludge digesters. The manure digesters contained high levels of ammonia and of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and were dominated by members of the Methanosarcinaceae, while the sludge digesters contained low levels of ammonia and of VFA and were dominated by members of the Methanosaetaceae. The methanogenic diversity was greater in reactors operating under mesophilic temperatures. The impact of the original inoculum used for the reactor start-up was also investigated by assessment of the present population in the reactor. The inoculum population appeared to have no influence on the eventual population.

[1]  R. E. Hungate,et al.  The Roll-Tube Method for Cultivation of Strict Anaerobes , 1972 .

[2]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1) , 2002 .

[3]  K. Schleifer,et al.  The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. , 1999, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[4]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[5]  D. Stahl,et al.  Quantification of methanogenic groups in anaerobic biological reactors by oligonucleotide probe hybridization , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[6]  C. Rubies.  Brock Biology of Microorganisms, 9th ed , 2001 .

[7]  A Ohashi,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity of mesophilic and thermophilic granular sludges determined by 16S rRNA gene analysis. , 1998, Microbiology.

[8]  B. Ahring,et al.  Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors , 1995, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  Birgitte Kiær Ahring,et al.  Acetate conversion in anaerobic biogas reactors: Traditional and molecular tools for studying this important group of anaerobic microorganisms , 2004, Biodegradation.

[10]  James G. Ferry,et al.  Methanogenesis : Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry and Genetics , 1994 .

[11]  M. Bazin,et al.  Microbial population dynamics , 1982 .

[12]  S. K. Bhattacharya,et al.  The effect of ammonia on methane fermentation processes , 1989 .

[13]  B. Ahring,et al.  Kinetics of lactate, acetate and propionate in unadapted and lactate-adapted thermophilic, anaerobic sewage sludge: the influence of sludge adaptation for start-up of thermophilic UASB-reactors , 1991, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[14]  K. McMahon,et al.  Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--II: Microbial population dynamics. , 2001, Water research.

[15]  R. Wolfe,et al.  FORMATION OF METHANE BY BACTERIAL EXTRACTS. , 1963, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  D. Stahl,et al.  Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes to describe natural communities of methanogens , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  Awwa,et al.  Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater , 1999 .

[18]  J. Delgenès,et al.  Contribution of molecular microbiology to the study in water pollution removal of microbial community dynamics , 2002 .

[19]  B. Ahring,et al.  Effects of lipids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion and reduction of lipid inhibition upon addition of bentonite , 1990, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[20]  Sòren Tafdrup.  Centralized biogas plants combine agricultural and environmental benefits with energy production. , 1994 .

[21]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  Lutgarde Raskin,et al.  Quantification of Syntrophic Fatty Acid-β-Oxidizing Bacteria in a Mesophilic Biogas Reactor by Oligonucleotide Probe Hybridization , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  A. Stams,et al.  Detection and quantification of microorganisms in anaerobic bioreactors , 2004, Biodegradation.

[24]  B. Schink.  Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation , 1997, Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR.

[25]  Hideki Harada,et al.  Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Using 16S rRNA-Targeted Oligonucleotides Reveals Localization of Methanogens and Selected Uncultured Bacteria in Mesophilic and Thermophilic Sludge Granules , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[26]  Birgitte Kiær Ahring,et al.  Anaerobic Treatment of Manure Together with Industrial Waste , 1992 .

[27]  P. Hugenholtz,et al.  Design and evaluation of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 2002, Methods in molecular biology.

[28]  R. E. Hungate.  Chapter IV A Roll Tube Method for Cultivation of Strict Anaerobes , 1969 .

[29]  G. Lettinga,et al.  The influence of ammonium-nitrogen on the specific activity of pelletized methanogenic sludge , 1984 .

[30]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics , 1991 .

[31]  David A. Stahl,et al.  Development and application of nucleic acid probes , 1991 .

[32]  Irini Angelidaki,et al.  Anaerobic thermophilic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: Effect of temperature , 1994 .

[33]  B. Patel,et al.  Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of methanogenic Archaea. , 2000, Anaerobe.