Necker cube: stimulus-related (low-level) and percept-related (high-level) EEG signatures early in occipital cortex.

During observation of an ambiguous Necker cube, our percept changes spontaneously although the external stimulus does not. An EEG paradigm allowing time-resolved EEG measurement during endogenous perceptual reversals recently revealed a chain of ERP correlates beginning with an early occipital positivity at around 130 ms (Reversal Positivity, "RP"). In order to better understand the functional role of this RP, we investigated its relation to the P100, which is spatiotemporally close, typically occurring 100 ms after onset of a visual stimulus at occipital electrodes. We compared the relation of the ERP amplitudes to varying sizes of ambiguous Necker cubes. The main results are: (1) The P100 amplitude increases monotonically with stimulus size but is independent of the participants' percept. (2) The RP, in contrast, is percept-related and largely unaffected by stimulus size. (3) A similar pattern to RP was found for reaction times: They depend on the percept but not on stimulus size. We speculate that the P100 reflects processing of elementary visual features, while the RP is related to a processing conflict during 3D interpretation that precedes a reversal. The present results indicate that low-level visual processing (related to stimulus size) and (relative) high-level processing (related to perceptual reversal) occur in close spatial and temporal vicinity.

[1]  S A Hackley,et al.  Early visual processing during binocular rivalry studied with visual evoked potentials. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[2]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual reversals for three different types of multistable images. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Antigona Martínez,et al.  Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation during binocular rivalry , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  C. Clifford.  Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[8]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  MEG alpha activity decrease reflects destabilization of multistable percepts. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  Michael A. Pitts,et al.  When and Where Is Binocular Rivalry Resolved in the Visual Cortex? Design and Procedure Eeg/erp Methods Source Analyses , 2022 .

[11]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Necker cube—an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing , 2005, Vision Research.

[12]  E. Basar,et al.  Gamma-band responses in the brain: a short review of psychophysiological correlates and functional significance. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[14]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Quantum Zeno features of bistable perception , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[15]  Ahmet Ademoglu,et al.  Alpha activity decreases during the perception of Necker cube reversals: an application of wavelet transform , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  J. Orbach,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: I. An Examination of the Concept of “Satiation of Orientation” , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  E. Boring.  A new ambiguous figure. , 1930 .

[18]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  E. Schröger,et al.  Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: a human event-related brain potential study , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[20]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[21]  A. Proverbio,et al.  ERP signs of early selective attention effects to check size. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Michael Bach,et al.  Bistable perception -- along the processing chain from ambiguous visual input to a stable percept. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[24]  L. A. N. Esq.,et al.  LXI. Observations on some remarkable optical phænomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phænomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid , 1832 .

[25]  Osvaldas Rukšėnas,et al.  Reversal negativity and bistable stimuli: Attention, awareness, or something else? , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[26]  R. van Ee,et al.  Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[27]  Robert P O'Shea,et al.  Early correlates of visual awareness in the human brain: Time and place from event-related brain potentials. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[28]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Juergen Kornmeier,et al.  Evidence for early visual processing in perceptual disambiguation of ambiguous figures , 2004 .

[30]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[31]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  N. Squires,et al.  Visual evoked potentials to illusory reversals of the necker cube. , 1988, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort,et al.  The spatiotemporal profile of cortical processing leading up to visual perception. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[34]  Agr McClelland,et al.  LEVELS OF PROCESSING , 1980 .

[35]  E Başar,et al.  Multistable visual perception induces a slow positive EEG wave. , 1993, The International journal of neuroscience.

[36]  Theodor Landis,et al.  Right parietal brain activity precedes perceptual alternation of bistable stimuli. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  D Vickers,et al.  A Cyclic Decision Model of Perceptual Alternation , 1972, Perception.

[38]  Michael Bach,et al.  Ambiguous Figures and Binding: Eeg Frequency Modulations during Multistable Perception , 2022 .

[39]  World Medical Association (WMA),et al.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects , 2009, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[40]  S. Lui,et al.  Temporal cortex participates in spontaneous perceptual reversal , 2009, Neuroreport.

[41]  R. Blake.  © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[42]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Attentional load modifies early activity in human primary visual cortex , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[43]  Michael Bach,et al.  Multistable perception: When bottom-up and top-down coincide , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[44]  Michael Bach,et al.  Discontinuous presentation of ambiguous figures: how interstimulus-interval durations affect reversal dynamics and ERPs. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Guideline 5: Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 2006, American journal of electroneurodiagnostic technology.

[46]  Daniel Strüber,et al.  EEG gamma-band response during the perception of Necker cube reversals , 2001 .

[47]  Harald Atmanspacher,et al.  Cognitive Time Scales in a Necker-Zeno Model for Bistable Perception , 2008 .