Multimodal evacuation after subway breakdown: A modeling framework and mode choice behavior

Abstract Subway is the backbone of the urban transportation system. However, because of its superior and high-capacity performance, it is difficult to evacuate the stranded passengers through other modes when unexpected disruptions happen. Previous studies paid much attention to the evacuation by gapping buses, but little attentions to the potential of the subway network and the transfers with other transport modes. This paper proposed a multimodal emergency evacuation modeling framework in response to subway breakdowns. The multinomial logit model was employed to analyze the evacuees alternative mode choice behavior. A case study of Longyang road subway station was analyzed by the proposed modeling framework, an SP (Stated Preference) survey of alternative evacuation modes was conducted for the calibration of the multinomial logit model. The results showed that a multimodal emergency evacuation based on the subway network could meet the requirements of evacuees, and make full use of all transport modes and improve evacuation efficiency. The research enriches the existing theory of multimodal emergency evacuation of the subway, and the conclusions can be used as a reference for emergency management and decision-making of subway emergencies.

[1]  Yan Li,et al.  Evacuation Network Optimization Model with Lane-Based Reversal and Routing , 2016 .

[2]  Yajuan Deng,et al.  Design of Bus Bridging Routes in Response to Disruption of Urban Rail Transit , 2018, Sustainability.

[3]  Jinliang Xu,et al.  Use of Shared-Mobility Services to Accomplish Emergency Evacuation in Urban Areas via Reduction in Intermediate Trips—Case Study in Xi’an, China , 2018, Sustainability.

[4]  E. Yao,et al.  Travel Choice Analysis under Metro Emergency Context: Utility? Regret? Or Both? , 2018, Sustainability.

[5]  Douglas R. Bish,et al.  Planning for a bus-based evacuation , 2011, OR Spectr..

[6]  Loon Ching Tang,et al.  Enhancing metro network resilience via localized integration with bus services , 2014 .

[7]  Passenger Travel Behavior Analysis under Unplanned Metro Service Disruption: Using Stated Preference Data in Guangzhou, China , 2020 .

[8]  Yu Zhou,et al.  A Feeder-Bus Dispatch Planning Model for Emergency Evacuation in Urban Rail Transit Corridors , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  Makoto Fujiu,et al.  Estimation of Disaster Evacuation Behavior Model using Stated Preference Data , 2016 .

[10]  Brian Wolshon,et al.  Traffic modelling and simulation for regional multimodal evacuation analysis , 2012, Int. J. Adv. Intell. Paradigms.

[11]  X. D. Yan,et al.  A risk-based method for planning of bus-subway corridor evacuation under hybrid uncertainties , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Xu Ruihua,et al.  Bus Dispatching Strategies in Urban Rail Emergent Events , 2010 .

[13]  Daniel T. Cox,et al.  An agent-based model of a multimodal near-field tsunami evacuation: Decision-making and life safety , 2016 .

[14]  D. Hensher Stated preference analysis of travel choices: the state of practice , 1994 .

[15]  Uday Venkatadri,et al.  Development of a Multimodal Microsimulation-Based Evacuation Model , 2019 .

[16]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Managing Large-Scale Multimodal Emergency Evacuations , 2010 .

[17]  Jian Li,et al.  Understanding evacuation and impact of a metro collision on ridership using large-scale mobile phone data , 2017 .

[18]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Planning for the unplanned: an international review of current approaches to service disruption management of railways , 2012 .

[19]  Vedat Bayram,et al.  Optimization models for large scale network evacuation planning and management: A literature review , 2016 .

[20]  Ali Shamshiripour,et al.  Analysis of transit users’ waiting tolerance in response to unplanned service disruptions , 2019 .

[21]  G. Currie,et al.  Transit User Reactions to Major Service Withdrawal - A Behavioral Study , 2018 .

[22]  Jim Ercolano MSci Pedestrian Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Management of Mass Evacuations on Foot: State-of-the-Art and Best Practices , 2008 .

[23]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  An Overview on Multimodal Emergency Evacuation in an Urban Network , 2013 .

[24]  Leo G. Kroon,et al.  Shuttle Planning for Link Closures in Urban Public Transport Networks , 2014, Transp. Sci..

[25]  Zhijie Yang,et al.  Compensation Decisions on Disruption Recovery Service in Urban Rail Transit , 2019 .

[26]  Zhao Zhang,et al.  Agent-based Modeling for Evacuation Traffic Analysis in Megaregion Road Networks , 2015, ANT/SEIT.

[27]  Nirajan Shiwakoti,et al.  Improving bus bridging responses via satellite bus reserve locations , 2014 .

[28]  Haizhong Wang,et al.  Understanding the Multimodal Evacuation Behavior for a Near-Field Tsunami , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[29]  Wei Dong,et al.  Bus Bridging Disruption in Rail Services With Frustrated and Impatient Passengers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[30]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization for Multimodal Evacuation , 2010 .

[31]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms , 2009, Public Transp..

[32]  Amedeo R. Odoni,et al.  Optimizing Bus Bridging Services in Response to Disruptions of Urban Transit Rail Networks , 2016, Transp. Sci..

[33]  Amy Z. Zeng,et al.  Collaboration Decisions on Disruption Recovery Service in Urban Public Tram Systems , 2012 .

[34]  Yan Fang,et al.  Replacement service decisions for disruption recovery in light rail systems , 2019, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.

[35]  Bin Ran,et al.  An Integrated Contraflow Strategy for Multimodal Evacuation , 2014 .