Board 31: Engineering with Engineers: Revolutionizing a Mechanical Engineering Department Through Industry Immersion and a Focus on Identity

The Mechanical Engineering Department at Seattle University was awarded a grant by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments (RED) program in July 2017. This award supports the development of a mechanical engineering program where students and faculty are immersed in a culture of doing engineering with industry engineers that in turn fosters an identity of being an engineer. Cultivating a culture of doing engineering can result in graduates who not only are prepared technically and professionally with a practical, realistic understanding of what it is to be an engineer, but also who identify with and are committed to the engineering profession. This culture of doing engineering is created through changes in four essential areas indicated by research: a shared department vision, faculty, curriculum, and supportive policies. Unifying these changes is a significant connection to industry. This paper reviews the initial process of developing this culture of “Engineering with Engineers” and shares progress in the four essential areas needed to develop a culture of doing engineering. It also provides insights on lessons learned.

[1]  S. Stryker.  Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version , 1980 .

[2]  J. H. Tufts.  Human Nature and the Social Order. , 1903 .

[3]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[4]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[5]  Mary Besterfield-Sacre,et al.  Changing Engineering Education: Views of U.S. Faculty, Chairs, and Deans , 2014 .

[6]  James D. Lee,et al.  More than Ability: Gender and Personal Relationships Influence Science and Technology Involvement , 2002 .

[7]  Aditya Johri,et al.  On the development of a professional identity: engineering persisters vs engineering switchers , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[8]  Susan E. Cross,et al.  The Interdependent Self-Construal and Social Support: The Case of Persistence in Engineering , 2001 .

[9]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[10]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[11]  Amy L. Kristof.  PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[12]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[13]  K. Deaux.  Reconstructing Social Identity , 1993 .

[14]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group Identification , 1997 .

[15]  Robin D. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary Findings On Freshmen Engineering Students’ Professional Identity: Implications For Recruitment And Retention , 2009 .

[16]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Basking in Reflected Glory: Three (Football) Field Studies , 1976 .

[17]  Judith N. Martin,et al.  Intercultural Communication in Contexts , 2006 .

[18]  P. Burke,et al.  The Past, Present, and Future of an Identity Theory* , 2000 .

[19]  Yen-Lin Han,et al.  Board 55: Engineering with Engineers: Revolutionizing Engineering Education through Industry Immersion and a Focus on Identity , 2018 .

[20]  C. Henderson,et al.  Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature , 2011 .

[21]  Olga Pierrakos,et al.  How salient is the identity of engineering students? on the use of the Engineering Student Identity Survey , 2016, 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[22]  西平 直,et al.  アイデンティティとライフサイクル = Identity and the life cycle , 2011 .

[23]  James D. Lee.  Which Kids Can ‘Become’ Scientists? Effects of Gender, Self-Concepts and Perceptions of Scientists , 1998 .

[24]  C. Henderson,et al.  Increasing the Impact and Diffusion of Stem Education Innovations , 2022 .