Comparison of twenty three nebulizer/compressor combinations for domiciliary use.

We have assessed the physical and dynamic characteristics of 23 home jet nebulizer/compressor combinations currently available in the UK and Europe. The combinations were evaluated in terms of pressure-flow characteristics, aerosol mass distribution, volume output, electrical costs, and sound level. In addition, we determined the effect of nebulizer fill volume on aerosol mass distribution and volume output. One nebulizer was used with six different compressors, and four compressors were tested with three different nebulizers. The pressure-flow relationships showed a wide variation between models, as did flow-rate at the nebulizer (range 3.0-8.0 L.min-1). The mean +/- SD volume nebulized after 10 min using an initial fill volume of 2.5 and 5.0 mL was 46 +/- 9 and 34 +/- 12%, respectively. The mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) over a 5 min nebulization ranged 2.6 to 10.2 microns. Nine of the nebulizations produced an MMAD of less than 5 microns at both fill volumes. Changing nebulizer/compressor combinations affected flow rate, MMAD and volume output. Sound levels varied between models. Running costs were low, with all using less than 74 kilowatt hours of energy per year. We conclude that there is a wide variation in performance of nebulizer/compressor combinations for use with nebulized bronchodilators. Correct matching of the nebulizer/compressor is seen to be important to ensure optimum performance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  S. Stenton,et al.  Jet and ultrasonic nebuliser output: use of a new method for direct measurement of aerosol output. , 1990, Thorax.

[2]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Importance of evaporative water losses during standardized nebulized inhalation provocation tests. , 1989, Chest.

[3]  D. Pavia,et al.  Factors influencing the size distribution of aerosols from jet nebulisers. , 1983, Thorax.

[4]  D. Pavia,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF JET NEBULISERS FOR LUNG AEROSOL THERAPY , 1983, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Newhouse,et al.  Aerosol penetration into the lung; influence on airway responses. , 1981, Chest.

[6]  E. Juniper,et al.  Standardization of inhalation provocation tests: influence of nebulizer output, particle size, and method of inhalation. , 1981, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[7]  M Lippmann,et al.  Deposition, retention, and clearance of inhaled particles. , 1980, British journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  P. Morrow.  Experimental studies of inhaled materials. A basis for respiratory models. , 1970, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  Mercer Tt,et al.  Effect of auxiliary air flow on the output characteristics of compressed-air nebulizers. , 1969 .

[10]  A. Black,et al.  Deposition of Aerosol Particles in the Nasopharyngeal Region of the Human Respiratory Tract , 1969, Nature.

[11]  Hatch Tf,et al.  Deposition and retention models for internal dosimetry of the human respiratory tract. Task group on lung dynamics. , 1966 .

[12]  J. A. Wood,et al.  Changes in salbutamol concentration in the reservoir solution of a jet nebulizer. , 1986, British journal of diseases of the chest.

[13]  J. Heyder,et al.  Deposition of particles in the human respiratory tract in the size range 0.005–15 μm , 1986 .

[14]  T. T. Mercer,et al.  Production and characterization of aerosols. , 1973, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  C. Melandri,et al.  Simulation of the regional deposition of aerosols in the respiratory tract. , 1971, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.