The variation of the estimated GPS instrumental bias and its possible connection with ionospheric variability

Based on the analysis of the satellite DCB data estimated by our method and the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) from 1999 to 2011, the features of the temporal variation of differential code biases (DCB) are studied. Summarily, there are three types of variations in DCB on different time scales. The first one is the day-to-day variation that exhibits more obviously in solar maximum years. The second one is the variation with about one year periodic variation that behaves more obviously from 1999 to 2004. The last one is the monotonously descending tendency from 1999 to 2010. Considering the basic ionospheric approximation in DCB estimation method, the features of the variability of the ionospheric morphology from 1999 to 2010 are also displayed based on the ionospheric characteristic parameters. It can be concluded that the day-to-day and annual variation of the estimated global positioning system (GPS). DCB is related to the ionospheric variability. The variation of DCBs on solar cycle time scale includes the real hardware DCBs and pseudo-DCBs induced by ionospheric variation. No doubt, these kinds of “pseudo” variations of DCB will affect the precision of ionospheric total electron content (TEC) derived from the GPS data. In addition, this study is helpful for evaluating the influence of ionospheric weather on TEC derivation and is also useful for developing one estimation method of DCB with more stability and precision through introducing a more practical ionospheric model.

[1]  W. John,et al.  Solar Cycle Variation and Application to the Space Radiation Environment , 1999 .

[2]  Jean Lilensten,et al.  Calibration of the TEC derived from GPS measurements and from ionospheric models using the EISCAT radar , 2003 .

[3]  Aleksandar Jovancevic,et al.  Ionospheric measurement with GPS: Receiver techniques and methods , 2007 .

[4]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The influence of geomagnetic storms on the estimation of GPS instrumental biases , 2009 .

[5]  Dale N. Anderson,et al.  Comparisons of TOPEX and Global Positioning System total electron content measurements at equatorial anomaly latitudes , 1997 .

[6]  Gregory Bishop,et al.  The effect of the protonosphere on the estimation of GPS total electron content: Validation using model simulations , 1999 .

[7]  Sandro M. Radicella,et al.  Calibration errors on experimental slant total electron content (TEC) determined with GPS , 2007 .

[8]  Zuo Xiao,et al.  Accuracy analysis of the GPS instrumental bias estimated from observations in middle and low latitudes , 2010 .

[9]  A. Garcia-Rigo,et al.  The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998 , 2009 .

[10]  E. Sardón,et al.  Estimation of total electron content using GPS data: How stable are the differential satellite and receiver instrumental biases? , 1997 .

[11]  A. Mazzella,et al.  The contribution of the protonosphere to GPS total electron content: Experimental measurements , 1999 .

[12]  Gabor E. Lanyi,et al.  A comparison of mapped and measured total ionospheric electron content using global positioning system and beacon satellite observations , 1988 .

[13]  Henry Rishbeth,et al.  Patterns of F2-layer variability , 2001 .

[14]  E. Kawai,et al.  Evaluation of GPS‐based ionospheric TEC map by comparing with VLBI data , 2003 .

[15]  P. V. S. Rama Rao,et al.  On the validity of the ionospheric pierce point (IPP) altitude of 350 km in the Indian equatorial and low-latitude sector , 2006 .

[16]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  A global mapping technique for GPS‐derived ionospheric total electron content measurements , 1998 .

[17]  Claudio Brunini,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of the bias between TOPEX- and GPS-derived total electron content , 2005 .

[18]  Orhan Arikan,et al.  Estimation of single station interfrequency receiver bias using GPS‐TEC , 2008 .

[19]  Takuya Tsugawa,et al.  A new technique for mapping of total electron content using GPS network in Japan , 2002 .

[20]  Li Qiang,et al.  Methods of Estimation of GPS Instrumental Bias from Single Site's GPS Data and Comparative Study of Results , 2007 .

[21]  Hyun-Yup Lee,et al.  Assessment of GPS global ionosphere maps (GIM) by comparison between CODE GIM and TOPEX/Jason TEC data: Ionospheric perspective , 2010 .

[22]  Yang Gao,et al.  Ionospheric TEC predictions over a local area GPS reference network , 2004 .

[23]  James R. Clynch,et al.  Variability of GPS satellite differential group delay biases , 1991 .

[24]  Takashi Maruyama,et al.  Determination of GPS receiver differential biases by neural network parameter estimation method , 2005 .

[25]  Guanyi Ma,et al.  Derivation of TEC and estimation of instrumental biases from GEONET in Japan , 2002 .