Consumers’ willingness to pay for organic chicken breast: Evidence from choice experiment

Abstract This paper assesses consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for organic chicken using a choice experiment. Specifically, we examined consumers’ WTP for a general organic label and a USDA certified organic label on chicken breast. Our results indicate that consumers are willing to pay a premium of 1.193$/lb (34.8%) for the general organic label and 3.545 $/lb (103.5%) for the USDA organic label. WTP also differs between demographic groups as well as between different types of consumers based on the purchase frequency of organic meat products. The WTP premium for a general/USDA organic label was lowest for the non-buyers (−29.6% and 26.2%), followed by the occasional buyers (35.7% and 97.3%). The habitual buyers were willing to spend a premium of 146.6% for general and 244.3% for USDA certified organic labeled chicken breast. For all buyer types, USDA organic certification was valued more than the general organic label implying that consumers trust the USDA organic products more than a general organic label.

[1]  Nova Scotia.  Organic and Conventional Food: A Literature Review of the Economics of Consumer Perceptions and Preferences , 2006 .

[2]  Peeter W. J. Verlegh,et al.  Range and Number-of-Levels Effects in Derived and Stated Measures of Attribute Importance , 2002 .

[3]  John A. List,et al.  Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards , 2001 .

[4]  L. Åberg,et al.  Attitudes towards organic foods among Swedish consumers. , 2001 .

[5]  Emmanuel K. Yiridoe,et al.  Comparison of consumer perceptions and preference toward organic versus conventionally produced foods: A review and update of the literature , 2005, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[6]  Ximing Wu,et al.  On the Use of Cheap Talk in New Product Valuation , 2007 .

[7]  Attentional Contrast during Sequential Judgments: A Source of the Number-of-Levels Effect , 2008 .

[8]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods , 2008 .

[9]  T. Brown,et al.  Evaluating the Validity of the Dichotomous Choice Question Format in Contingent Valuation , 1997 .

[10]  Athanasios Krystallis,et al.  Consumers' willingness to pay for organic food: Factors that affect it and variation per organic product type , 2005 .

[11]  F Reed Johnson,et al.  Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care. , 2009, Journal of health economics.

[12]  Søren Bøye Olsen,et al.  Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods , 2009 .

[13]  Zhifeng Gao,et al.  Effects of Label Information on Consumer Willingness‐To‐Pay for Food Attributes , 2009 .

[14]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[15]  Jutta Roosen,et al.  Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States , 2003 .

[16]  K. Train.  Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People , 1998 .

[17]  M. Loureiro,et al.  Consumers’ valuation of nutritional information: A choice experiment study , 2009 .

[18]  J. Fannin,et al.  Calibrating Online Survey Sample for Economic Impact Analysis , 2007 .

[19]  Carl Johan Lagerkvist,et al.  Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments , 2005 .

[20]  S. Ricke,et al.  Effect of organic poultry purchase frequency on consumer attitudes toward organic poultry meat. , 2010, Journal of food science.

[21]  John A. List,et al.  What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? , 2001 .

[22]  Larry Lockshin,et al.  Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice , 2006 .

[23]  Helen R. Neill,et al.  Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments , 1994 .

[24]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation , 2003 .

[25]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[26]  G. Tonsor,et al.  Consumer Willingness to Pay for Livestock Credence Attribute Claim Verification , 2010 .

[27]  M. Burton,et al.  Consumer preferences for GM food and other attributes of the food system , 2003 .

[28]  K. Lancaster.  A New Approach to Consumer Theory , 1966, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  J. Barreiro-Hurlé,et al.  Is there a market for functional wines? Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for resveratrol-enriched red wine , 2008 .

[30]  J. Prescott,et al.  A Comparison of the Nutritional Value, Sensory Qualities, and Food Safety of Organically and Conventionally Produced Foods , 2002, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[31]  Russell Blamey,et al.  Choice Modeling and Tests of Benefit Transfer , 2002 .

[32]  Gary Koop,et al.  Modelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland , 2002 .

[33]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[34]  C. Greene,et al.  Organic Poultry and Eggs Capture High Price Premiums and Growing Share of Specialty Markets , 2006 .

[35]  Bhargab Maitra,et al.  Willingness-to-pay and preference heterogeneity for rural bus attributes , 2007 .

[36]  Maurizio Canavari,et al.  Stated Willingness-to-Pay for Organic Fruit and Pesticide Ban , 2005 .

[37]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Irish consumer preference for organic meat , 2002 .

[38]  An Experimental Investigation of Willingness to Pay for Non-GM and Organic Food Products , 2005 .

[39]  J. Nielsen.  Use of the Internet for willingness-to-pay surveys: A comparison of face-to-face and web-based interviews , 2011 .

[40]  Edward P. Lazear,et al.  A Jobs-Based Analysis of Labor Markets , 1995 .

[41]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method , 1999 .

[42]  Richard C. Bishop,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias , 2009, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[43]  A. Krystallis,et al.  Is There a Real Difference Between Conventional and Organic Meat? Investigating Consumers' Attitudes Towards Both Meat Types as an Indicator of Organic Meat's Market Potential , 2006 .

[44]  John B. Loomis,et al.  Improving Validity Experiments of Contingent Valuation Methods: Results of Efforts to Reduce the Disparity of Hypothetical and Actual Willingness to Pay , 1996 .

[45]  P. Zarembka.  Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[46]  T. Schroeder,et al.  European preferences for beef steak attributes , 2005 .

[47]  K. Train.  Halton Sequences for Mixed Logit , 2000 .

[48]  K. Train.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[49]  T. Schroeder,et al.  Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks , 2004 .

[50]  Benjamin L. Campbell,et al.  Revisiting Cheap Talk with New Evidence from a Field Experiment , 2011 .

[51]  Felix Eggers,et al.  Hybrid individualized two-level choice-based conjoint (HIT-CBC): A new method for measuring preference structures with many attribute levels , 2009 .

[52]  R. Bernabéu,et al.  Women, men and organic food: differences in their attitudes and willingness to pay. A Spanish case study , 2007 .

[53]  David Aadland,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling with Detection and Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias , 2003 .

[54]  C. Plott,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics Results , 2008 .

[55]  J. Barreiro-Hurlé,et al.  The Effects of Multiple Health and Nutrition Labels on Consumer Food Choices , 2010 .

[56]  E. Tsakiridou,et al.  Attitudes and behaviour towards organic products: an exploratory study , 2008 .

[57]  Christopher M. Fleming,et al.  Web-based surveys as an alternative to traditional mail methods. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[58]  F. Norwood,et al.  How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior? , 2009 .

[59]  Benjamin L. Campbell,et al.  On the Use of Valuation Mechanisms to Measure Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Novel Products: A Comparison of Hypothetical and Non-Hypothetical Values , 2007 .

[60]  C. Bhat.  Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequences , 2003 .

[61]  J. Lusk,et al.  Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness‐To‐Pay for Golden Rice , 2003 .

[62]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Provision Point Mechanisms and Field Validity Tests of Contingent Valuation , 2002 .

[63]  James J. Murphy,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation , 2003 .

[64]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Labelling Genetically Modified Food: Heterogeneous Consumer Preferences and the Value of Information , 2005 .

[65]  James J. Murphy,et al.  Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Hypothetical Bias in a Provision Point Mechanism? , 2003 .

[66]  W. Moon,et al.  WTP and WTA for Non-GM and GM Food: UK Consumers , 2006 .

[67]  Benjamin M. Onyango,et al.  Understanding Consumer Interest in Organics: Production Values vs. Purchasing Behavior , 2008 .